United States: New Jersey's Often Confounding Affidavit Of Merit Act

In Cobb v. New Plan Cinnaminson Urban Renewal, LLC, et al., (Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Div., Civil Part, Burlington County, Docket No. L-2148-14) (Transcript of Motion, May 29, 2015), a personal injury plaintiff was injured by a motor vehicle, while she was a pedestrian crossing through a shopping center parking lot. Plaintiff initially asserted claims against an engineer alleged to have designed the parking lot. However, upon a challenge to the qualifications of plaintiff's expert, the plaintiff withdrew her Affidavit of Merit and discontinued all of her claims against that engineer. Unfortunately, with cross-claims already asserted against the named engineer by numerous co-defendants, a unique problem presented itself under the current state of law concerning New Jersey's Affidavit of Merit Act.

The Affidavit of Merit Act:

Under the Affidavit of Merit Act, a plaintiff seeking damages, for personal injuries, wrongful death or property damage, resulting from an alleged act of architectural or engineering malpractice, cannot state a claim against the architect or engineer without providing an appropriate and timely Affidavit of Merit. The Affidavit of Merit must be executed by a similarly licensed professional, and state that "there exists a reasonable probability that the care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited in the ... practice or work that is the subject of the complaint, fell outside acceptable professional ... standards."

The Procedural History of the Cobb case:

In Cobb, when plaintiff discontinued her engineering malpractice claims and withdrew her Affidavit of Merit, the shopping center and parking lot premises owners, among other co-defendants, refused to discontinue their cross-claims against the engineer. Significantly, those parties had never filed a third-party complaint against the engineer, but nevertheless maintained cross-claims for contribution, common law indemnity and contractual indemnity against all co-defendants, including the engineer.

Notably, a cross-claim for contribution is a claim whereby one defendant seeks to have another defendant share in a percentage of liability, based on the two parties' respective percentages of fault. A cross-claim for common law indemnity is similar, except requires that the one defendant allege and prove that the other is 100% at fault. This latter type of claim is most appropriate where one defendant claims that it is only passively liable, and that the other defendant (possibly the first defendant's agent or employee) was the primary and active wrongdoer. Ultimately, both types of cross-claims allow for allocation, at trial, of multiple defendants' respective responsibilities toward the plaintiff.

With such cross-claims still pending in Cobb, the engineer could only extricate itself from the case by moving to dismiss all cross-claims against it. While the absence of any indemnity agreement allowed for quick dismissal of the contractual indemnity cross-claims, the Court refused to dismiss cross-claims for contribution and common law indemnity.

The Engineer's Arguments for Dismissal of Cross-Claims under the Affidavit of Merit Act:

The engineer argued that, where an Affidavit of Merit is not filed against it, or, more specifically, withdrawn as it was here, a formal dismissal of plaintiff's claims is required. And, where plaintiff voluntarily discontinued those claims, the end result should be deemed the same – a formal dismissal of plaintiff's claims with prejudice, as would otherwise be obtained through motion practice. And, without any direct malpractice claims asserted by plaintiff against the engineer, the engineer should not have to defend against cross-claims, which do not allege any facts independent of plaintiff's discontinued claims.

As such, the engineer argued, the Affidavit of Merit Act required dismissal of all contribution and common law indemnity cross-claims against it. But, to preserve the other co-defendants' right to allocate damages among all named defendant, an allowance could be made whereby, at trial, the engineer's name remain on the jury verdict sheet. Thus, in the unlikely event that facts arose at trial to support an engineering malpractice claim, even though neither plaintiff nor the other defendants were pursuing such a claim, an allocation, or percentage of liability, could be assigned to the engineer.

In that scenario, with no direct claims asserted by plaintiff against the engineer, plaintiff would still not be entitled to any recovery against the engineer. But, the co-defendants would be entitled to a credit, offsetting and reducing any money judgment awarded against them. No pay out by the engineer would ever be required, only a theoretical allocation of liability, at worst.

Indeed, the engineer's argument for dismissal of the cross-claims against it, pursuant to the Affidavit of Merit Act, as stated above, is greatly supported by appellate division case law set forth in Burt v. West Jersey Health Systems, 339 N.J. Super. 296 (App. Div. 2001). Burt explicitly states that the Act is meant to protect a defendant professional such as the engineer in Cobb, not only from a plaintiff's direct claims, but, also, from the expense and burden of continued litigation on cross-claims for contribution and indemnification. The procedure, as described above and endorsed by Burt, where a dismissed defendant's name still appears on the jury verdict sheet allows for a delicate balancing of the co-defendants' rights to allocate damages, with the professional's right to protection under the Affidavit of Merit Act. In the absence of such a balance, the professional may lose all real benefit to protections afforded by the Act.

The Trial Court's Decision in Cobb:

Unfortunately, the trial judge in Cobb considered plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of her claims against the engineer to be distinguishable from a Court's dismissal of such claims, on motion, where a plaintiff had failed to provide an Affidavit of Merit pursuant to the statutory requirements. In this regard, the Court seems to have even ignored the fact that the Cobb plaintiff's stipulation of dismissal of her claims against the engineer had also, expressly withdrawn her Affidavit of Merit on those claims.

Thus, and based on the above reasoning, the Court distinguished the facts before it from those in Burt v. West Jersey Health Systems. In Burt, the plaintiff suffered a dismissal of its claims, pursuant to motion practice, for failing to comply with the Affidavit of Merit statute. As such, based mainly on the fact that the Cobb plaintiff voluntarily dismissed her malpractice claims and voluntarily withdrew her Affidavit of Merit, the trial judge in Cobb held that the engineer would not be entitled to the same protections from cross-claims that would have otherwise been afforded under Burt. 

Secondarily, the court relied on the further formal distinction, that the Affidavit of Merit Act mandates what "plaintiffs" must do, and as the cross-claimants never filed a third-party complaint, they could not be considered "plaintiffs" or third-party "plaintiffs." Thus, the Court reasoned that the Act did not otherwise apply to the cross-claiming co-defendants to require them to obtain their own Affidavits of Merit. To be clear, if the Court had, for instance, converted the cross-claims to third-party claims, the Act would have unquestionably governed, and required those co-defendants to submit their own Affidavits of Merit if they wished to proceed against the engineer.

Conclusion:

While the engineer considered a future appeal of the trial court's decision and its application of Burt, or, alternatively, a renewal of its application to dismiss the cross-claims after more discovery was conducted, the owners and other co-defendants ultimately offered to dismiss their cross-claims against the engineer without prejudice, deciding not to pursue a malpractice theory of liability and to avoid that theory of the case entirely. The case soon after settled without the engineer's further involvement.

While the engineer's insistence on its protections, afforded by the Affidavit of Merit Act, did not immediately pay off in this case, in connection with the cross-claims for contribution and common law indemnity, those statutorily enacted protections should not be discounted where unique obstacles appear. And, hopefully, more case law in this developing area, in the vein of Burt, or modifications of the Act itself, will better clarify the importance and strength of those protections.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.