United States: Analogizing An Internet Accessible Computer To Broken Window Blind, Court Finds No Expectation Of Privacy In Computers

Last Updated: July 13 2016
Article by Saad Gul and Michael E. Slipsky

​A federal court in the Eastern District of Virginia has held that a user utilizing a computer connected to the Internet has no expectation of privacy because hackers have repeatedly demonstrated their ability to circumvent security measures with impunity. As discussed below, the ruling could be a simple instance where hard facts lead to bad law. But perhaps more likely, it demonstrates the difficulties courts continue to grapple with when technology is changing faster than the law's ability to absorb the change.

The underlying facts are disturbing. In 2015, the FBI launched a global sting operation targeting child pornography. The Bureau focused on child sites utilizing Tor and similar anonymous networks. During the operation, it took control of a child pornography server. Using hacking methods known as a networking investigative technique (NIT), the Bureau collected 1500 IP addresses. It then traced the IP addresses to individual defendants through their ISPs and arrested them.

The arrested individuals challenged the underlying warrants under a variety of theories with varying degrees of success. A case from the Western District of Washington marked the defendant-friendly end of the spectrum. That defendant sought the details behind the NIT. Pointing to cases where innocent computer users had becoming unwitting hosts of large amounts of child pornography after pedophiles infect their computers with malware, the defendant argued that he was entitled to this information.

The FBI declined to divulge the details of NIT, explaining that disclosure would enable future targets to evade detection. The defense argued that it was entitled to full disclosure, given the complexity of the NIT technology and the FBI's purported history of misleading courts about that technology. The Washington district court ultimately sided with the defendant. While it denied a motion to dismiss, its decision to suppress NIT-related evidence meant the prosecution would struggle to prevail.

The Virginia case arose out of the same FBI sting, and marks the government-friendly end of the spectrum. In that case, the defendant mounted a series of challenges, seeking, inter alia, to suppress the underlying warrant and additional discovery entitling him to the workings of NIT. The court found that the defendant had no expectation of privacy in a computer connected to the Internet. Moreover, even if he had such an expectation, it would be unreasonable.

The court began its analysis by noting that the government would not have been able to identify the defendant's address without deploying NIT to his computer. It acknowledged substantial authority from multiple jurisdictions holding that a user has an expectation of privacy in a password protected computer. Nevertheless, the court held that users' perception of the Internet, and their corresponding expectation of privacy in physical computers and the data they contain, has shifted dramatically in recent years.

Noting that hacking is more prevalent now than a decade ago, the court reasoned that the increased risk of hacking has changed the user's reasonable expectation of privacy to the point where "it seems unreasonable to think that a computer connected to the Web is immune from invasion." To the contrary, the court found that "it appears to be a virtual certainty that computers accessing the Internet can – and eventually will – be hacked." Pointing to a series of high-profile hacks including Sony, Ashley Madison, Home Depot, the so-called "Panama leaks", and even the Office of Personnel Management, the court held that since such breaches were now unexceptional, their inevitability had sunk into the public consciousness. Therefore, a user of a computer connected to the Internet had no reasonable expectation of privacy.

The court's finding on this point hinged on its determination that "Defendant here should have been aware that by going [on-line to access the illegal pornography site], he diminished his expectation of privacy." The court relied on Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83 (1998), where the Supreme Court had held that that a police officer looking through broken window blinds  had not violated the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights. The court found that Carter's broken window blinds were analogous to a networked computer:  "Just as the area into which the officer in Carter peered—an apartment—usually is afforded Fourth Amendment protection, a computer afforded Fourth Amendment protection in other circumstances is not protected from Government actors who take advantage of an easily broken system to peer into a user's computer. People who traverse the Internet ordinarily understand the risk associated with doing so." 

The court had already ruled that the FBI had acted pursuant to a valid warrant. Therefore, its  holding that there is no expectation of privacy in a networked machine is arguably dicta.  As such, its significance could be limited. Nevertheless, as a harbinger of potential future developments, the implications would be stunning: for instance, a government regulator could conceivably base civil or even criminal enforcement action on the basis of information contained on office computers  without a warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion. 

Likewise, the notion that Internet users have no reasonable expectation of privacy contradicts the very premise of online data privacy regulation—namely, that individuals not only have reasonable expectations of online privacy but rights to privacy that are capable of being protected in the ordinary course of business. A creative defendant might seek to apply the court's reasoning to challenge the level of compliance required under data privacy regulations—after all, what constitutes an appropriate safeguard in a world where no-one should reasonably expect to enjoy online privacy? Admittedly, these would seem to be unlikely developments, given that they would be stemming from a single district court decision in a single matter with highly unsympathetic facts.

A larger point remains salient: as Justice Alito noted recently, technology is rapidly outpacing the law. As courts across the country grapple with unprecedented scenarios generated by technological advances, the temptation to graft onto superficially clear and simple (but potentially pernicious) solutions may prove hard to resist.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Saad Gul
Michael E. Slipsky
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions