United States: New Republican Tax Proposal: The Key To Unlocking US Tax Reform In 2017?

Last Updated: July 6 2016
Article by Warren Payne

On June 24, 2016, House Republicans, led by Speaker Paul Ryan and Ways & Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, released an outline of an aggressive tax reform proposal. This proposal has many similarities to a proposal put forward by the Bush Administration in 2005, but one aspect of the new proposal—its treatment of pass-through business—may hold the key to unlocking tax reform in 2017.

Overview

The corporate and international tax components of the proposal are very similar to the Growth and Investment Tax Plan included in the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform report released in November 2005 (sometimes referred to as the "Breaux – Mack Report"). From an economic perspective, both proposals broadly attempt to achieve the same economic outcomes and incentives that are associated with a consumption tax while maintaining the structure of an income tax. A number of the recommendations in the proposal are presented at a high level, and therefore the full impact of some of the recommendations are unclear pending the development of those details. In addition, the proposal notes that transition rules, which are not specified in the proposal, will need to be developed.

Business Tax: The proposal lowers the corporate tax rate to one flat rate of 20 percent and repeals the corporate AMT. It provides for full expensing for both tangible and intangible property in the year in which the investment takes place.

To offset the revenue lost from lowering the tax rate, the proposal eliminates the deduction for interest expense. Interest expense would be deductible only against interest income. This applies to interest payments made both domestically and internationally to related and unrelated parties.

International Tax: With regard to international tax reform, the proposal shifts the United States to a territorial system by providing a deduction equal to 100 percent of qualifying foreign source income. In addition, the proposal borrows a policy typically incorporated in value-added taxes (VATs) by applying border adjustments to both imports and exports. The proposal repeals most of the existing Subpart F regime, leaving in place only the foreign personal holding company rules. The proposal applies a one-time transition tax, or mandatory repatriation, on earnings currently held off shore. The tax on these earnings would be applied at a rate of 8.75 percent on cash and liquid assets and a rate of 3.5 percent on reinvested earnings. This transition tax would be payable ratably over eight years.

Pass-Through Tax: The proposal's new approach to the taxation of pass-through entities may be its most significant contribution to the tax reform debate. The proposal creates a new business entity tax under which active business income earned by pass throughs is taxed at a maximum rate of 25 percent. Non-qualifying income is taxed at the individual rates, and qualifying income is eligible for the lower individual rates if it does not exceed the income bracket associated with the lower rates. Thus, the proposal breaks the current link between the top individual tax rates and pass-through income.

Individual Tax: The proposal collapses the existing rate structure into three brackets of 12, 25 and 33 percent. Individual AMT is repealed. Income from capital gains, dividends and interest receives a 50 percent exclusion (effectively taxing that income at one half the individual rates). It repeals the estate tax. It greatly expands the size of the standard deduction and child tax credit. Retirement, mortgage interest deduction and charitable deduction are maintained although potentially in different forms.

Analysis

The reduction in the corporate rate to 20 percent represents a significant reduction in marginal tax rates and for many sectors a reduction in effective rates as well. The non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation has previously estimated that a one percentage point reduction in the US corporate rate results in between $100 billion and $140 billion in lost revenue per year.

The repeal of the corporate AMT provides some marginal simplicity for taxpayers but, more importantly, taxpayers would receive a credit on AMT paid that can be carried forward as part of the repeal of AMT.

The proposal reduces the ability of taxpayers to use net operation losses (NOLs) to reduce tax liability in two ways. First, it caps the extent to which NOLs can eliminate tax liability to a maximum of 90 percent of the total liability. Second, it eliminates NOL carrybacks.

The shift to full expensing creates strong incentives for companies to increase capital investments. The elimination of interest deductions creates an incentive for taxpayers to rely on equity financing for their investments. This could pose a significant barrier to investing for taxpayers who do not have access to equity markets or otherwise do not have access to significant amounts of liquid capital. It could also have a significant negative impact on the real estate sector. The Tax Foundation, a tax policy think tank, has previously estimated that elimination of the interest deduction could raise approximately $150 billion per year in higher revenue. The proposal specifically notes that certain sectors, namely financial services, banking, insurance and leasing, will need additional rules or special consideration with regard to the elimination of interest deductions.

With respect to base-broadening provisions, in addition to repealing the interest deduction, the proposal implies that all other tax expenditures are repealed unless explicitly stated that they are retained. For example, section 199 is repealed. The proposal states that the R&D tax credit will remain in some form. The proposal also notes that last-in-first-out (LIFO) accounting would be maintained. This may be an indication that LIFO would be maintained as a transition rule as full expensing presumably also applies to inventories. While the proposal seeks to move towards a consumption tax structure, unlike in traditional consumption taxes, wages and labor costs would remain deductible expenses.

Perhaps the most important contribution to the overall tax debate this proposal makes is its new structure for the taxation of pass-through entities. This new structure has potential to resolve one of the most significant partisan constraints to achieving tax reform. The proposal would subject active business income earned by pass-through entities to a maximum tax rate of 25 percent. While the proposal maintains a disparity between the corporate rate of 20 percent pass through, businesses would also benefit from lower individual tax rates at lower levels of income. Under the proposal individual taxpayers currently subject to either the 10 or 15 percent rate would be taxed at 12 percent. Thus, pass-through income that would qualify for the 12 percent rate would still be taxed at 12 percent, and only income in excess of that threshold (currently a maximum of $75,300) would be subject to tax at the 25 percent rate. The proposal does not provide details on what income would qualify for the business rate versus the individual rate.

There are significant partisan differences among members of Congress over whether the top individual tax rates should be lowered as part of tax reform. Democrats in Congress have broadly opposed lowering the top individual tax rates because it would benefit high-income individuals. Republicans in Congress have broadly supported maintaining the link between pass-through business income and the top individual rates due to the belief that this link provides an anchor that limits how high the top individual rate can climb. Pass-through entities pay tax as individuals and therefore can be subject to the top individual tax rates. Groups representing pass-through entities have advocated for parity between the corporate tax rate and the rates paid by pass-through entities.

The current proposal provides a mechanism around the partisan differences on whether to lower the top individual tax rates by segregating active business income from individual income and subjecting the former to a lower tax rate than the rate applied to individual income.

Notwithstanding the lack of important technical details, the overall structure could provide a potential path around the partisan gridlock on individual rates and become a key to unlocking business tax reform in 2017.

With regard to international reform, the proposal comes close to a pure territorial regime by providing a 100 percent exemption for foreign source income. It repeals all of the Subpart F income rules except for those related to personal holding company income.

The only other anti-base erosion rule in the proposal is one that would make the corporate income tax border adjustable. Income earned from export sales would be exempt from tax, and imports would be subject to tax. The proposal would apply the border adjustment to all goods, services and intangibles. While the proposal does not provide details on how the border adjustment would operate, given the similarities between the current proposal and the 2005 proposal, it may be useful to review how the 2005 proposal would implement border adjustments. The 2005 proposal recommended a "destination-based" approach. With regard to exports, a company would not be subject to tax on export income and would receive a rebate or credit in an amount equal to the cost of producing the export, including labor costs. With regard to imports, taxpayers would be denied the ability to take the costs of the import as an expense deduction when calculating taxable income. For example, assume a US corporation imports a part that is incorporated into a finished manufactured product. Under the 2005 proposal, the cost of the imported part could not be included in the taxpayer's cost of goods sold (COGS) and subtracted from net income. As a result, the cost of the imported product would be added to the corporation's taxable income.

With respect to the border adjustability of intangibles we can hypothesize on how this could work in practice. For example, assume that a corporation enters in a license agreement for the right to use patented technology where the patent holder is located in a foreign country. As part of the license agreement, the US corporation pays a royalty to the patent owner but manufactures the product in the United States. Presumably, based on the limited description available, the royalty paid to the foreign patent would not be a deductible expense, and the royalty costs would be added to the corporation's taxable income.

The current proposal notes that applying this border adjustment would level the playing field for US companies versus their foreign competitors that benefit from the border adjustability of VAT taxes in those countries. However, the proposal would actually provide a significant competitive advantage for US exporters versus foreign competitors. While foreign corporations can benefit from a rebate of VAT taxes on exports, export income is still subject to income tax in those countries. Under this proposal, export income earned by US corporations would be completely exempt from federal tax.

The current proposal states that because the new corporate income tax structure mimics that of a consumption tax from an economic perspective, it is equivalent to an indirect tax under World Trade Organization (WTO) rules.WTO rules permit the border adjustment of indirect taxes. Because the proposal lacks many of the details required to truly analyze the operation and effects of the border adjustment, it is not possible to make a conclusive determination as to whether the proposal is in fact consistent with US WTO obligations.

The implementation of border adjustments would undoubtedly be a significant change for companies that have a global supply chain. The tax implications of the loss of expense deductions for imported products would be significant. In addition, border adjustability would presumably require substantial documentation requirements on the part of the taxpayer. These documentation requirements likely would also need to be contemporaneous as they directly impact the tax liability of the company in that tax year.

Originally published July 5, 2016

Learn more about our International Trade, Government Relations, Tax Transactions & Consulting and Real Estate practices.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2016. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions