United States: Confidentiality Agreements: Two Lurking Problems

Originally published by Anderson Kill's Commercial Litigation Advisor & Alert, May 2016

Business litigation these days frequently involves the production of voluminous documents in discovery. At the same time, clients may want their documents to be held confidential and to limit the persons who can examine them. The solution is usually for the parties to make the document production and related discovery subject to a confidential­ity agreement.

Given the time pressures inherent in meet­ing discovery deadlines, and the prodigious number of documents to be reviewed and produced, counsel may adopt a confidential­ity agreement that's been used before and a "Let's worry about that later" approach when it comes to identifying specific documents that will be subject to the agreement.

However, kicking the can down the road in this fashion can lead to trouble later on. Two items that are problematic are "attorneys' eyes only" provisions and attempts to require that documents filed in court be sealed.

What About the Client?

Attorneys' eyes only provisions generally prohibit documents so designated from be­ing disclosed to anyone other than the at­torneys litigating the matter, including pro­hibiting disclosure to the client. Yet many attorneys are not aware that such provisions may run afoul of two important and related principles:

  1. A client is entitled to participate mean­ingfully in litigation in which it is involved.
  2. Outside counsel has an ethical obligation to inform the client of information ob­tained in the litigation so that the client can make informed decisions.

For these reasons, both case law and the New York Rules of Professional Conduct effec­tively counsel that attorneys' eyes only provi­sions must be strictly limited to trade secrets or information that is akin to a trade secret in that it would provide competitors with an ad­vantage.

In the Gryphon case, the New York Appel­late Division held that documents should not be designated "attorneys' eyes only" when such a designation "prevents counsel from fully discussing with their clients all of the relevant information in the case so as to prop­erly formulate a defense to the action against them."1 In so holding, the First Department also pointed out that the defendants in the Gryphon case were not business competitors of the plaintiffs; instead the parties were sim­ply adversaries in litigation. Claims of "preju­dice" in litigation, not involving trade secrets, do not justify marking documents "attorneys' eyes only."2

Similarly, the New York Rules of Profes­sional Conduct compel lawyers to keep their clients informed to an extent that would vi­olate most attorneys' eyes only provisions. Specifically, Rule 1.4 (b) requires counsel to "explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make in­formed decisions regarding the represen­tation." The rules also require a lawyer to "reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client's objectives are to be accomplished," to "keep the cli­ent reasonably informed about the status of the matter," and "promptly comply with a client's reasonable requests for informa­tion." Rule 1.4(a) (2-4). If an attorneys' eyes only provision prohibits counsel from con­sulting with in-house counsel or business principals concerning certain documents or information obtained in discovery, com­plying with that provision can result in a violation of the New York Rules of Profes­sional Conduct.

What About the Public?

Provisions that require the sealing of "confidential" documents that are submitted in court are also problematic. The Appellate Division has held that there is a strong pub­lic interest, grounded in both constitutional and common law, in providing the public with access to documents and information that a court may use to render a decision.3 In light of the "broad constitutional pre­sumption" arising from the First and Sixth Amendments, "any order denying access must be narrowly tailored to serve compel­ling objectives, such as a need for secrecy that outweighs the public's right to access."4 The right of the public to access is also rec­ognized in common law principles, which have "long recognized that civil actions and proceedings should be open to the public in order to ensure that they are conducted ef­ficiently, honestly, and fairly."5

Accordingly, rules in New York prohibit sealing of court records "except upon a writ­ten finding of good cause" that must specify the grounds for the sealing and must "con­sider the interests of the public as well as the parties."6 Even where the litigants agree to sealing, the strong public interest in the transparency of judicial proceedings may override their agreement.

The classic situation in which there might be "good cause" for sealing would be a true trade secret, perhaps a patented man­ufacturing formula. In contrast, a claim of "prejudice" in the litigation is not sufficient, especially where the opposing party is not a business competitor but is only a garden variety adverse party.7

The New York City Bar Association web­site provides a model confidentiality agree­ment (http://www.nycbar.org/pdf/report/ModelConfidentiality.pdf) that is endorsed by New York's Commercial Division. The model agreement does not contain an attor­neys' eyes only provision; however, it does contain "sealing" provisions that can cre­ate both logistical and legal complications down the road.

The "Moral" of the Story?

The takeaway here is that while it may seem convenient in the midst of document production to sign off on a confidentiality agreement and worry about the ramifications later, some provisions may warrant more im­mediate scrutiny and analysis so as to avoid significant problems later. And designating a document that will be filed in court as "confi­dential" should be limited to those situations, such as trade secrets, in which sealed filings are actually warranted.

John M. O'Connor is a shareholder in the New York office of Anderson Kill. Mr. O'Connor, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, is an experienced trial and appellate litigator and was a litigation strategist in the cited TransCanada case concerning business-interruption insurance. | joconnor@andersonkill.com

Carrie Maylor DiCanio is an attorney in the New York office of Anderson Kill. Ms. DiCanio concentrates her practice on corporate and commercial litigation and insurance recovery, exclusively on behalf of policyholders. Ms. DiCanio also co-chairs Anderson Kill's Women's Network. | cdicanio@andersonkill.com


1 Gryphon Domestic VI, LLC v. APP Int'l Fin. Co., B.V., 28 A.D.3d 322, 325 (1st Dep't 2006) ("Gryphon"); see TC Ravenswood, LLC v. National Union Ins. Co., No. 400759- 2011, 2015 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4940, at *10 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. New York County, June 10, 2015) (parties were not com­petitors; alleged harm in other litigation insufficient).

2 Gryphon at 326.

3 Danco Labs., Ltd. v. Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter, Ltd. 274 A.D.2d 1, 6 (1st Dep't 2000).

4 Gryphon, 28 A.D.3d at 324.

5 In re Conservatorship of Brownstone, 191 A.D.2d 167, 168 (1st Dep't 1993).

6 22 NYCRR section 216.1.

7 Gryphon, 28 A.D.3d at 326; Ravenswood at 8; Mosallem v. Berenson, 76 A.D.3d 345 (1st Dep't 2010); Mancheski v. Gabelli Group Capital Partners, 39 A.D.3d 499 (2d Dep't 2007).

About Anderson Kill

Anderson Kill practices law in the areas of Insurance Recovery, Commercial Litigation, Environmental Law, Estate, Trusts and Tax Services, Corporate and Securities, Antitrust, Banking and Lending, Bankruptcy and Restructuring, Real Estate and Construction, Foreign Investment Recovery, Public Law, Government Affairs, Employment and Labor Law, Captive Insurance, Intellectual Property, Corporate Tax, Hospitality, and Health Reform. Recognized nationwide by Chambers USA for Client Service and Commercial Awareness, and best-known for its work in insurance recovery, the firm represents policyholders only in insurance coverage disputes - with no ties to insurance companies and has no conflicts of interest. Clients include Fortune 1000 companies, small and medium-sized businesses, governmental entities, and nonprofits as well as personal estates. Based in New York City, the firm also has offices in Ventura, CA, Philadelphia, PA, Stamford, CT, Washington, DC and Newark, NJ.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions