The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has teed up another D.C. Circuit battle regarding the scope of its authority. On Monday, June 13, the CFPB filed a notice of appeal of the district court's decision to dismiss the CFPB's petition to enforce a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) issued to the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS).  A CID is akin to an administrative subpoena, which the CFPB is authorized to issue as part of its investigative authority.  The CFPB had issued a CID to ACICS as part of an investigation whose purpose was to determine whether any person (presumably including ACICS) had engaged in unlawful practices "in connection with accrediting for-profit colleges" in violation of the Dodd-Frank Act's prohibition on unfair, deceptive and abusive acts and practices (UDAAP).  The UDAAP prohibition, however, is generally only applicable to those persons who provide consumer financial products or services, or those who knowingly or recklessly provide substantial assistance to a UDAAP violation.  ACICS moved to dismiss the petition, arguing that the CFPB's investigation was outside the agency's jurisdiction, since ACICS did not provide consumer financial products or services.  The CFPB argued that ACICS' accreditation of for-profit schools may have substantially assisted those schools in committing unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in connection with their lending programs.  The district court agreed with ACICS, finding that the CFPB's investigation of the accreditation process was outside the scope of the agency's authority, and dismissed the petition.  Now that the CFPB has appealed the district court's decision, the D.C. Circuit will have an opportunity to opine both on the scope of the agency's investigative authority and its jurisdiction.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2016. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.