United States: Could Kentucky Require Identification Of Those Who Choose To Be Uninsured?

Article by Carl N. Frazier of Stoll Keenon Ogden and Dustin E. Meek of Tachau Meek


Kentuckians are familiar with the concept of requiring individuals to procure certain minimum liability insurance before engaging in potentially risky behavior. Perhaps the most ubiquitous risky behavior – operating an automobile – has long required motorists to obtain liability insurance.1 Kentucky law also requires individuals who practice certain occupations such as electricians and plumbers, for example, to maintain a minimum level of liability insurance.2 The rationale for mandatory liability insurance is clear; it protects the public in the event of inevitable mistakes.

The practice of law is fraught with the opportunity for mistakes. Attorneys are fiduciaries for their clients in a landscape that is full of deadlines and close calls and where the rules are constantly changing. Attorney errors are inevitable and can sometimes cause extraordinary consequences for clients. Despite this, Kentucky does not mandate all practicing attorneys procure liability insurance. In 2000, the Kentucky Supreme Court enacted a rule that requires attorneys who practice in limited liability business entities to maintain either "adequate professional liability insurance" or "adequate financial coverage."3 The required amount of insurance varies between $250,000 per claim and $500,000 per year and $5,000,000 per claim and $10,000,000 per year, depending upon the number of attorneys in the entity. Attorneys in these entities may avoid the required liability insurance by having deposits, a letter of credit, or a surety bond of between $250,000 and $5,000,000, again depending upon the number of attorneys in the entity. No rule requires disclosure of an attorney's security status to clients or the public. For those attorneys who practice outside a limited liability entity, there is no requirement for liability insurance at all.

In 2015, William E. Johnson, then-President of the Kentucky Bar Association ("KBA"), commissioned a Taskforce on Professional Liability Insurance (the "Taskforce") to study various issues involving professional liability insurance, including mandatory coverage and/or mandatory disclosure of coverage. The Taskforce consisted of practitioners from around the Commonwealth (including the authors) and was co-chaired by Charles E. "Buzz" English, Jr. and Beverly R. Storm. The Taskforce studied the approaches to this issue taken by jurisdictions throughout the country. On August 5, 2015, the Taskforce delivered its report to Douglass Farnsley, current KBA President. The Taskforce unanimously recommended the adoption of the American Bar Association ("ABA") Model Rule on disclosure of liability insurance (discussed below). The KBA Board of Governors is considering the Taskforce's recommendation.

II. The Varying Landscape

"Mandatory Insurance" is a common phrase used to describe a varying set of rules and provisions relating to the regulation of lawyers and professional liability insurance. By its clear terms, the phrase would seem to indicate that "mandatory insurance" means that lawyers are required to maintain professional liability insurance or else face risk of ethical violation or sanction. But that is not the case. Only the state of Oregon requires all lawyers to maintain a minimum level of professional liability coverage, but it has created a mandatory provider (the Professional Liability Fund) with the support of state government to help lawyers meet that requirement. Since 1978, the Oregon Professional Liability Fund has provided coverage of $300,000.00 per claim/$300,000.00 aggregate to all attorneys engaged in the private practice of law, and lawyers are assessed a base fee (e.g., $3,000.00) for this coverage. Many other states have some form of mandatory disclosure of an attorney's professional liability insurance.

As one may expect, rules regarding mandatory disclosure of lawyer professional liability insurance vary by jurisdiction. Twenty-six states have adopted some form of required disclosure.4 Mandatory disclosure regimes can be divided into two general types: 1) those that require disclosure directly to the client; and 2) those that require disclosure only to the state regulatory organization. Those jurisdictions requiring disclosure to the regulator outnumber by two-to-one those that require disclosure directly to the client.5

To better understand the wide variety in the mandatory disclosure landscape, consider Michigan and South Dakota. These states are among those at both ends of the disclosure spectrum. In Michigan, a lawyer must confidentially report to the state bar association whether he or she has liability insurance.6 South Dakota is at the other end of the spectrum with "the most stringent reporting requirement of any state."7 Like Michigan, South Dakota lawyers must disclose to the state bar association whether they carry professional liability insurance.8 Yet in addition, South Dakota requires lawyers carrying less than $100,000.00 in liability insurance to state that they are not insured both on their letterhead and in "every written communication with a client."9 Not coincidentally, 97% of South Dakota lawyers report carrying liability insurance with limits of at least $100,000.00.10

Of the seven states bordering Kentucky, four have some type of mandatory disclosure rule (Illinois, Ohio, Virginia, and West Virginia).11 Ohio is one of the few states that require direct disclosure to the client. There, any lawyer with professional liability insurance limits of less than $100,000.00 per occurrence and $300,000.00 aggregate must disclose that fact to the client in a writing signed by both the lawyer and the client.12 Virginia's rule is patterned on the ABA Model Rule discussed below. Virginia lawyers must simply disclose whether they carry professional liability insurance in response to the annual dues statement.13 The list of attorneys without insurance is available to the public on a searchable website.14

Those on both sides of the mandatory disclosure debate cite a number of arguments for their positions. Those in favor of required disclosure often argue that it helps clients make an informed decision in retaining an attorney and, because it encourages lawyers to obtain insurance, helps protect clients and others who may be harmed by a lawyer's negligence.15 Individuals against mandatory disclosure often argue that it is not necessary because of the perceived low numbers of uninsured lawyers.16 Opponents also assert that required disclosure may lead to negative consequences such as increasing the cost of legal services, stigmatizing those who cannot afford insurance, and increasing the number of malpractice lawsuits.17

While only approximately one-half of the states have a mandatory disclosure requirement, the number has been increasing. Indeed, the number of states with mandatory disclosure has more than doubled since the adoption of the ABA Model Rule in 2004.18 Of the states to expressly consider the issue, only five have rejected a disclosure rule.19 A sixth state – North Carolina – initially adopted but then later repealed its mandatory disclosure rule.20

II. American Bar Association Model Rule and Taskforce Recommendation

After four years of discussion and debate, the ABA House of Delegates narrowly approved a Model Court Rule on Insurance Disclosure (the "Model Rule") in 2004.21 The Model Rule requires any lawyer in private practice to annually certify to the state's highest court whether he or she is currently covered by professional liability insurance. The Model Rule also requires attorneys to notify the court if that coverage lapses or terminates. Any lawyer not complying with the rule is unauthorized to practice until he or she complies. Those providing false information are subject to disciplinary action. The ABA recommends that attorneys' insurance status be available to the public.

The Taskforce unanimously proposed the adoption of a new Supreme Court Rule patterned on the ABA Model Rule. Under the Taskforce's proposal, every attorney engaged in the private practice of law (government and in-house attorneys would be exempt) would have to certify to the KBA annually whether he or she is covered by professional liability insurance with minimum limits of at least $100,000 per claim and $300,000 per aggregate. Attorneys would be required to notify the KBA within thirty days of any lapse in coverage. Whether an attorney has liability insurance would be information available to the public. Nothing in the Taskforce's proposed rule would require attorneys to purchase insurance. Rather, attorneys would simply have to report whether they have certain minimum insurance. The Taskforce felt this approach balanced the interests of attorneys in being able to choose whether to purchase insurance and the public in having access to attorneys' insurance status.

The Taskforce's recommendation is just that – a recommendation. The KBA Board of Governors has a process for vetting and approving proposed Supreme Court Rules before submitting proposals to the Kentucky Supreme Court for consideration. Whether to enact a rule relating to insurance disclosure is ultimately a determination for the Supreme Court. Hopefully, the research compiled by the Taskforce will be useful as KBA leaders and the Court weigh the interests involved in this complex area.


1 KRS 304.39-090.

2 KRS 227A.060(1)(c); KRS 318.030(2)(a).

3 SCR 3.024

4 See HALT, A National Look at Legal Malpractice Insurance Disclosure Requirements (2012) ("HALT Report").

5 See ABA Standing Committee on Client Protection, State Implementation of ABA Model Court Rule on Insurance Disclosure (2014) ("ABA Standing Committee Chart").

6 See Administrative Order No. 2003-5 (Mich. Sup. Ct.); see also HALT Report.

7 See Jeffrey D. Watters, What They Don't Know Can Hurt Them: Why Clients Should Know if Their Attorney Does Not Carry Malpractice Insurance, 62 Baylor L. Rev. 245, 256-57 (2010).

8 See ABA Standing Committee Chart.

9 See South Dakota R. Prof. Resp. 1.4; see also Watters, 62 Baylor L. Rev. at 257.

10 See ABA Standing Committee Chart

11 Id.

12 See Ohio R. Prof. Resp. 1.4.

13 See Watters, 62 Baylor L. Rev. at 256.

14 Id.

15 Id. at 247-50.

16 Id. at 251.

17 Id. at 251-53.

18 Id. at 254-55.

19 Id. at 255; see also ABA Standing Committee Chart.

20 See id.

21 http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/cpr/clientpro/Model_Rule_InsuranceDisclosure.authcheckdam.pdf

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions