United States: Why FTC's Action Against Lord & Taylor Was More Than Slap On Wrist

In an evolving digital world, advertisers are constantly looking for new ways to engage consumer interest, and to maintain that interest. Over the past few years, we have seen an explosion of "online celebrities"–stars on Vine, Instagram and YouTube–who have harnessed huge consumer followings in the fields of fashion, makeup, music and technology. They are subsequently hired by brands looking to monetize that consumer base.

Enter the regulators: namely, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which for years has been paying close attention to influencer, blogger and representative activities (including paid review practices). Last year the commission issued guidance updating the principles in its Endorsement Guides.

But the online landscape is moving fast. To maximize online exposure, brands are adopting comprehensive and multifaceted strategies to run campaigns across all types of media, pushing out content not only via influencer networks on social channels but also through online publishers. These publishers have integrated so-called native advertisements into the general look, feel and aesthetic of their publications to pique the interest of consumers.

Unluckily for some, the interest of regulators has also been piqued. The very benefit of native advertising--that it blends into surrounding editorial content to attract consumers--also poses the potential to mislead consumers if the source of the advertising message is not made clear at the point of contact. Concerns regarding deceptive influencer content and native advertising came to a head in March with the FTC's action against Lord & Taylor. The FTC claimed that the retailer paid for native advertisements and online influencer posts without disclosing that these were paid promotions for the company's 2015 Design Lab clothing collection. While Lord & Taylor ultimately settled the action, the retailer did not escape unscathed.

The Background

According to the FTC's complaint, Lord & Taylor paid Nylon, an online fashion magazine, to place an article in its publication and simultaneously post on Instagram about Lord & Taylor's new clothing collection. Both the article and the paid post included a photograph of one of the retailer's new Design Lab paisley dresses. The retailer also incentivized various online fashion personalities to post photos of themselves wearing the dress on social media over a "product bomb" weekend. The incentive was that the women wearing the dress received it for free and were also paid between $1000 and $4000. The social media campaign was extremely successful, reaching 11.4 million individual users and resulting in 328,000 brand engagements with Lord & Taylor's Instagram handle (such as likes, comments and reposts).

The catch? While Lord & Taylor reviewed, edited and approved all the paid content, it did not require Nylon (or any influencers) to include a disclosure that the content was paid for by Lord & Taylor. Nor did Lord & Taylor add any such disclosures as part of the editing and review process. Ultimately, neither the article nor any of the posts included any disclosure of the material connection to Lord & Taylor.

Notably, this action comes only a few months after the FTC issued an enforcement policy and business guidelines on native advertising (Native Guides), which expressly affirmed its position that traditional consumer protection principles under the FTC Act – and the need for transparency and disclosure – apply to native advertising. While many of the FTC's more recent examples in its guidance addressed some of the grey areas in native advertising, this was not one of them. This was paid content that not only promoted advertiser products but also appeared similar to the surrounding editorial content, and a disclosure was necessary to distinguish the editorial content from the paid advertising content.

The FTC also claimed that the retailer's failure to instruct influencers to disclose that they were compensated by Lord & Taylor violated the FTC's Endorsement Guides, an area of extensive FTC scrutiny over the last two years.

Did the Settlement Order Have Teeth?

While the FTC's settlement order imposed significant injunctive obligations on Lord & Taylor, the retailer was not required to pay any monetary penalties. On its face, the proposed consent order may not seem like a true punishment. Advertisers and their partners might be excused for seeing this outcome as a "slap on the wrist," a mere warning along with stern advice.

However, such a characterization does not take into consideration the FTC's statutory authority, and it downplays the significance of injunctive provisions required by the settlement. Remember that, while the FTC can require advertisers to pay redress or disgorge profits in the event of real harm to consumers (especially if the challenged act or practice was dishonest or fraudulent to consumers), under Section 5 of the FTC Act, the commission generally does not have the power to seek other monetary damages as part of a consent order. That said, these injunctive provisions not only have long lives, they may be actively monitored by the FTC. As such, the commission can impose significant civil penalties for violations of its orders. The magnitude of potential penalties stemming from failure to comply with an FTC order – which have been upwards of $10,000 per day in other FTC matters -- should not be underestimated.

Further, the injunctive orders impose stringent obligations, which are more far-reaching than they appear at first glance. Most notably, Lord & Taylor's consent order continues for a period of 20 years (which may be even longer if Lord & Taylor does not monitor compliance and violates the order going forward). It also imposes comprehensive disclosure, monitoring and reporting obligations. Specifically, Lord & Taylor must provide each of its endorsers with a clear statement of his or her disclosure responsibilities and obtain from each endorser a signed statement acknowledging receipt. Lord & Taylor must establish and maintain a system to monitor and review its endorsers' disclosures to ensure compliance with the FTC Endorsement Guides, and terminate any endorsers who fail to disclose their relationship with the retailer. The consent order also requires that Lord & Taylor maintain reports sufficient to show the results of its monitoring, which is a burdensome task when dealing with hundreds of influencers and possibly thousands of social media posts.

In addition, for five years following the dissemination of any endorsement covered by the order, Lord & Taylor must maintain and, upon reasonable notice, make available to the FTC all advertisements and promotional materials containing the endorsements and all contracts and written communications with any influencers, as well as any complaints regarding the retailer's failure to comply with these requirements. Once again, this is a time-consuming task, given that Lord & Taylor must compile this information from hundreds of influencers over multiple social media platforms. It may be some time before Lord & Taylor undertakes another comprehensive Influencer campaign.

While the majority of the consent order focused on the influencer campaign, the order received significant media attention because it was the FTC's first action involving native advertising. Before dismissing this action as a slap on the wrist, consider the number of articles that have scrutinized and criticized the Lord & Taylor campaign and the unfavorable publicity the retailer received as a result of this action. Further, Lord & Taylor's failure to abide by the FTC Endorsement Guides certainly does not help its reputation going forward.

Why Was Lord & Taylor Singled Out?

Why did the FTC choose to single out Lord & Taylor, especially when other parties, such as the influencers, the influencers' agency and the publisher also appeared to be at fault? The FTC certainly has the authority to hold other parties liable for their roles in engaging in deceptive trade practices. Yet the FTC chose not to add Nylon magazine, any of the influencers or the agency that hired the influencers to its complaint.

As for why the FTC did not bring an action against the influencers, the FTC has stated previously that it would prefer to bring actions against the advertiser or its advertising agencies, which the FTC holds more responsible. From a practical standpoint, the FTC could face significant PR fallout if were to bring multiple actions against the consumer influencers instead of holding the advertiser who orchestrated the campaign responsible.

As for why the FTC did not bring an action against the agency, according to the FTC, advertisers are ultimately responsible for the actions of their agencies. To the extent Lord & Taylor hired an agency (or multiple agencies) to administer its influencer program, Lord & Taylor should have ensured (and potentially contractually obligated) that the agency train the influencers to make appropriate disclosures, and monitor the influencers to make sure that they were doing so.

It is difficult to know why the FTC did not bring an action against Nylon, the publisher of the native article. It certainly impacts the analysis that Lord & Taylor was the single entity responsible for orchestrating the entire campaign – reviewing, editing and approving all the content, and managing the contractual relationships with multiple individuals as well as Nylon (and likely other publishers) to disseminate this content in a specific manner, but notably without a disclosure. Further, the widespread media buzz about Lord & Taylor's campaign at the time of dissemination – which included several articles about whether its influencers had in fact been incentivized – likely came to the attention of the FTC, which unearthed the deceptive native advertisements during the course of its wider investigation into the endorsement violations and took the opportunity to reinforce its recent guidance.

While all of the above parties appear to be somewhat at fault, Lord & Taylor was involved in each step of the campaign (including reviewing and approving the paid content), and had the most to gain from the campaign's success.

What Can We Learn?

This action should also serve as a warning sign that regulatory enforcement in this area will only intensify, and advertisers, agencies, influencers and publishers need to be aware of their ongoing obligations. They would do well to keep in mind the following takeaways:

  1. Pay careful attention to how native advertisements and influencers' activities are developed and placed. Evaluate whether disclosures are required when content has been paid for, approved or otherwise incentivized by a brand, and ensure, when necessary, clear and proximate disclosures are made in accordance with the FTC's Native Guides and Endorsement Guides.
  2. When engaging influencers, include language in their contracts that requires them to disclose their relationships and comply with FTC Endorsement Guides. Also provide the influencers with guidelines and examples of appropriate disclosures. Remember that regulatory risk cannot be contracted away. Closely monitor compliance, and terminate influencers who do not comply.
  3. Consider developing your own internal native advertising and influencer policies, as well as policies regarding the review and monitoring of publisher and influencer posts. This may be the best way to ensure that your internal teams as well as your partners and influencers are adhering to the key principles set forth in the Native Guides and Endorsement Guides.

Originally published by Corporate Counsel, April 4 2016.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.