United States:
"A View From The Sidelines 2: Oral Arguments And The New Supreme Court"
27 May 2016
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Jay Evans provides insights based on observation of oral
arguments in Kuren v. Luzerne County, a challenge concerning public
defenders in Luzerne County, and Rost v. Ford Motor, a toxic tort
matter concerning the scope of expert testimony, in "A View From the Sidelines 2: Oral Arguments and
the New Supreme Court," published in The Legal
Intelligencer on May 24, 2016.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from United States
Defenses To Contract Damages In New York
KI Legal
Defendants who face breach of contract damages claims can assert several defenses to mitigate, or altogether eliminate, a potential award of damages against them.
Is Premises Liability The Same As Negligence?
Ward and Smith, P.A.
In today's world, we travel all the time. We shop at grocery stores and department stores, we take walks on the sidewalks in our neighborhoods, and we go to large events, such as concerts or weddings, at various venues.
Defamation vs. Free Speech
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs
The concepts of defamation and free speech often collide, raising questions about where the line should be drawn between the right to express oneself and the responsibility...