United States: An Activist EEOC Seeks To Leave Its Mark

Seeking to capitalize on President Obama's final year in office, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "EEOC") is proposing a new burden on employers and codifying its positions on discrimination and retaliation.

Show Me the Money: Adding Pay Data to the EEO-1

On January 29, 2016, the seventh anniversary of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, President Obama announced that employers with more than 100 employees will be required to add pay information to their employer information reports, known as the EEO-1. This proposed report will permit the EEOC to review racial, ethnic, and gender distinctions in pay ranges and hours worked within broad job categories. Not only will this change create an additional administrative headache for employers, but this noncontextual data necessarily presents potential liability concerns.

The EEOC is proposing that employers disclose their employees' W-2 pay by grouping it into twelve wage bands. Currently, employers are required to complete the EEO-1 by September 30 each year using data from a twelvemonth period beginning in a pay period between July and September of the prior year, as selected by the employer. Even though the EEOC wants to use W-2 pay data, it does not plan to change the time frame of the collected data. Consequently, employers cannot rely on year-end W-2 amounts to create these reports, and instead will need to calculate annual W-2 data as of a date in the middle of the year.

The EEOC reasons that this additional reporting will require only a one-time programming update to an employer's human resources information system ("HRIS"). The EEOC may well be underestimating the ease with which such a change may be implemented. Moreover, for those employers who do not have a robust HRIS, this burden may be significant. As the assembly of this information will be exceedingly arduous, covered employers should strongly consider implementing an HRIS.

As for the use of W-2 gross pay, the EEOC reasoned that it provides a view of an employee's entire compensation, whereas salary or hourly pay rates would omit important supplemental compensation such as overtime hours and bonuses. However, such broad data, without context, offers little help in identifying discriminatory pay practices. Reporting of W-2 data alone does not explain one-off payments such as sign-on bonuses, relocation stipends, or compensation paid to substitute for equity being forfeited when a new employee leaves a former employer. It also does not capture stock options when they are granted and instead may report them when they are exercised years later.

Most important, the mere reporting of W-2 gross pay in EEO job categories does not provide context concerning differing job responsibilities, location, performance, experience, seniority, or education. It can be difficult to compare the compensation data of two employees in the same job, let alone all employees in a single EEO job category. For example, employees with managerial responsibilities are split into two categories: (1) First/Mid Level Officials and Managers and (2)Executive/Senior Level Officials and Managers. Because the Executive/Senior Level Official category of managers is limited to those employees who direct strategy for the business and are within two reporting lines of the CEO, large employers who have several reporting levels are forced to lump most of their managers into the First/Mid Level Officials category, although responsibilities and compensation of these individuals may vary greatly. Moreover, a first-level manager in a catering department might be compared to a manager of a trading desk responsible for generating revenues. Their compensation in all likelihood will be dramatically different, and the way such information is summarized and averaged on the EEO-1 may lead to an erroneous perception of discrimination.

Additionally, despite its intentions, the EEOC will not be able to determine discrepancies in the executive levels of the workforce in companies with high compensation levels. Because the top proposed wage band covers all employees who earn $208,000 or more, it may be impossible to conduct any meaningful analysis of data covering large swaths of highly compensated employees.

While the agency is required to keep all EEO-1 data confidential, the agency announced that it will develop a software tool to look at W-2 pay distribution within the individual employer and compare it to the employer's industry or location. The EEOC will continue to publish aggregated EEO-1 data as overviews of industry and national trends, but such publication will not reveal individual employer data. More important, litigants may submit Freedom of Information Actrequests for an employer's EEO-1 report as long as the request is accompanied by a copy of a complaint against the employer alleging violations of Title VII or the Americans with Disabilities Act that is stamped "filed."

The changes to the EEO-1 will be effective for reports due on September 30, 2017. Employers should wait for the final form to be issued, but begin planning to implement the HRIS and other changes that will be necessary to compile the required information.

The EEOC Reminds Employers of Workplace Rights for Muslim and Middle Eastern Employees

In the wake of the latest terrorist attacks and pronouncements of presidential candidates concerning Muslims in general, Americans are regularly discussing policy proposals related to Muslims and individuals of Middle Eastern descent. Consequently, the EEOC released a question and answer guide addressing issues related to employees and applicants who are, or are perceived to be, Muslim or Middle Eastern. The Q&A provides employees with specific steps for addressing potential harassment and discriminatory employment practices – many of which require employers to be mindful of their policies and practices.

Notably, the guide indicates the EEOC's interest in hiring practices. The EEOC writes that if an applicant believes he or she was not given a job because of his or her religion or national origin, the applicant should file a charge with the EEOC in order to "get[] enough facts to determine whether the action was discriminatory." Because it appears that the EEOC intends to be more focused on hiring practices, employers must be careful that their employment decisions are free from discrimination.

The remainder of the Q&A largely focuses on harassment of employees and directs employees to refer to their employer's anti-harassment policies and procedures and notify their managers of the alleged harassment. Indeed, the EEOC even recommends that employees document incidents of harassment. It also suggests that when management becomes aware that there is tension among employees concerning these topics the employer should send out a company-wide communication reminding all employees of anti-harassment policies or conduct anti-harassment training.

Finally, via this guidance, employers are reminded that employees must be offered reasonable accommodations to observe their religious practices when such deviations from workplace policies do not pose an undue burden.

In light of the EEOC's interest in this area, employers should review their anti-harassment policies, complaint procedures, and processes for considering reasonable accommodations to ensure they are updated. Additionally, employers should be mindful of workplace conversations that in the current climate could devolve into perceived harassment.

New Enforcement Guidance Regarding Retaliation

For the first time in eighteen years, the EEOC is seeking to update its enforcement guidance concerning retaliation, and it is pulling no punches. Since its 1998 guidance, the EEOC has seen a steady increase in retaliation charges. Accordingto the EEOC, retaliation has been alleged in almost half of all charges it received in 2014, and since 2008 it is the most frequently asserted charge. The 76-page proposed guidance was published for public comment in January 2016 and will likely replace the 1998 guidance in the coming months.

While not binding on courts, this new guidance will be used by EEOC investigators in assessing alleged violations of anti-discrimination laws. Largely, the EEOC's guidance summarizes Supreme Court rulings and cherry-picks its favorite circuit and district court decisions. The proposed guidance demonstrates the EEOC's broad interpretation of the three elements of retaliation: (a) an individual engages in protected activity, (b)adverse action is taken by the employer, and (c) a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse action exists. We highlight below some of the expansive interpretations.

The EEOC's guidance asserts that "protected activity" consists of (a) participating in an EEO process or (b) opposing a practice. The guidance provides the following clarifications, some of which are unexpectedly expansive:

  • An individual can succeed on a retaliation claim as long as he or she has a reasonable belief that he or she is engaging in protected activity, even if the individual is wrong about the existence of underlying discrimination.
  • The "opposition" clause of Title VII is expansive and includes accompanying a co-worker in filing an EEO complaint.
  • The agency rejects the "manager rule" created by some circuit courts, thereby protecting managers and human resources personnel from retaliation, explaining that efforts to protect against retaliation cannot be effective if "those employees best situated to call attention to and oppose an employer's discriminatory practices are outside its protective ambit."
  • A supervisor who does not carry out management's unlawful instructions can passively engage in protected activity.
  • It might be reasonable for an individual to inform union officials, co-workers, an attorney, or even persons outside the company of their complaint and thereby engage in protected activity.
  • Inquiries or discussions concerning compensation may suffice as oppositional activity if such activity could reasonably be interpreted as a complaint in opposition to discrimination.

For an adverse action to be actionable, the employer's conduct must be materially adverse and meant to deter a reasonable person from engaging in protected activity. Similarly, the EEOC's explanation of adverse action may catch some employers off guard, especially in light of the fact that several circuit and district courts disagree in some respects:

  • The standard can be met even if the individual was not in fact deterred.
  • Asingle incident may not be considered materially adverse, but if the employer's conduct as a whole would deter protected activityit will be considered materially adverse.
  • Actions outside the workplace may constitute adverse actions, such as disparaging comments to third parties.
  • Abusive verbal or physical behavior may be an adverse action, even if it would not meet the severe and pervasive standard necessary to create a hostile work environment, but "petty slights and trivial annoyances" are not sufficient.
  • Threats concerning an individual's immigration status may be considered an adverse action.
  • A manager's request that co-workers monitor an employee's activities constitutes an adverse action.

The guidance also warns employers not to engage in retaliation against third parties. For example, an employer is prohibited from retaliating against a complaining employee's co-worker relative or altering a vendor contract with the employee's family member in retaliation for the complaining employee's protected activity. Further, the EEOC takes the position that the complaining employee's relative (employee of the company or not) who was directly harmed by the retaliation has standing to pursue a retaliation claim against the employer.

Finally, the guidelines suggest the following best practices:

  • Maintain a written, easy-to-read anti-retaliation policy that includes examples of retaliation that may not be obvious, proactive steps for avoiding retaliation, a reporting mechanism for employee's concerns related to retaliation, and a clear explanation that retaliators can be subject to discipline, including termination.
  • Train all employees regarding the anti-retaliation policy, send a message from management that retaliation will not be tolerated, and hold periodic refresher courses.
  • Issue communications from senior management that the company will not tolerate retaliation.
  • Tailor training to issues that have occurred in the workplace.
  • Consider efforts to encourage workplace civility.
  • Proactively followup during the pendency of an EEO matter.
  • Review employment actions to ensure they are nonretaliatory.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.