United States: For Now, Residential Funding And "Inherent Authority" Doctrine For Spoliation Sanctions Live On

As noted in the Advisory Committee's commentary to the recently amended Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e), two goals of the amendments were: (1) to create uniformity among the Federal courts in imposing sanctions for the spoliation of electronically stored information, and (2) to prevent the imposition of harsh sanctions – such as an adverse inference instruction — for the merely negligent, or even grossly negligent, spoliation of ESI.

More specifically, the Committee's comment to amended Rule 37(e) points out that Federal circuit courts had established "significantly different standards for imposing sanctions or curative measures on parties who fail to preserve electronically stored information." Thus, the new rule "forecloses reliance on inherent authority or state law to determine when certain measures should be used" to address spoliation, although the commentary further points out that "the new rule applies only to electronically stored information."

The comments to Rule 37(e)(2) further clarify that the new rule "is designed to provide a uniform standard in federal court for use of these serious measures when addressing failure to preserve electronically stored information. It rejects cases such as Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2002), that authorize the giving of adverse inference instructions on a finding of negligence or gross negligence."

Since the amended Rules took effect on December 1, there have been a number of instances where Federal courts have continued to exert their "inherent authority" to sanction parties for the spoliation of evidence and/or apply the Residential Funding negligence or gross negligence standard. Perhaps not surprisingly, most of the cases clinging to the old standards are from the Second Circuit, where Residential Funding originated.

It appears that there are three primary reasons why courts have applied pre-amendment standards in favor of Rule 37(e).

1. Timing for the application of the new rules is "unjust" or "impractical"

First, some courts have declined to apply the new standards where it would be unjust to do so given the effective date of the new Rules. Noting that the amendments govern in all new proceedings filed after December 1, 2015, as well as all proceedings then pending "insofar as just and practical," a handful of courts have somewhat liberally determined that it would not be "just and practical" to apply the new Rule 37. For example, in McIntosh v. USA, 2016 WL 1274585 (S.D.N.Y. March 31, 2016), the court held that "it would fall short of justice and practicability" to apply the new Rule 37(e) to the Plaintiff's motion for sanctions, since "it makes sense to apply the old rules to motions briefed before the new rules came into effect." Similarly, in Thomas v. Butkiewicus, 2016 WL 1718368 (D.Conn. April 29, 2016), the court found that it was unjust to apply new Rule 37(e), which took effect 2˝ years before the plaintiff's claim was filed, and long before the facts arose regarding the spoliation of the missing video at issue.

Presumably, these types of situations might eventually disappear, as the new Rule 37(e) becomes more uniformly applied to sanctions motions in all pending and newly filed cases.

2. Spoliation of evidence other than Electronically Stored Information.

As mentioned above, the Advisory Committee's comments to Rule 37(e) provide that "the new rule applies only to electronically stored information." Some courts have therefore continued to apply Residential Funding and its progeny in cases dealing with the spoliation of non-ESI evidence.

For example, in Coale v. Metro-North Railroad Co., 2016 WEL 1441790 (D.Conn. April 11, 2016), the defendant allegedly spoliated evidence by cleaning up and failing to preserve or identify the oily substance upon which the plaintiff slipped and fell. In finding that the defendant had a duty to preserve the substance, the court declined to apply Rule 37(e), which is "expressly cabined only to ESI and therefore does not disturb the present application of the Residential Funding rule." Similarly, in In re: Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc., 2016 WL 2755877 (S.D.N.Y. May 12, 2016), the court awarded an adverse inference under Residential Funding, where the spoliation related to loss of physical evidence in the form of a notebook or log book. In Best Payphones, Inc. v. City of New York, 2016 WL 792396 (E.D.N.Y. 2.26.16), the court actually applied both the Rule 37(e) framework for addressing the spoliation of emails, and the Residential Funding "gross negligence" standard for addressing the spoliation of tangible evidence in the form of bank statements and daily activity reports.

3. Loss of information not governed by Rule 37(e).

A third kind of exception to the Rule 37(e) framework was also suggested in CAT3, LLC v. Black Lineage, Inc., 2016 WL 154116 (S.D.N.Y. January 12, 2016). There, the court was faced with a motion for sanctions where the plaintiff migrated its emails to a new system, which caused the domain name on all of its emails to change. The plaintiff argued that notwithstanding the altered domain suffix on all of its emails, it had nevertheless produced its emails in the case, meaning that there was never really any "loss of information" or spoliation under Rule 37(e). Magistrate Judge James C. Francis disagreed and held that the ESI had not been restored or replaced because the different versions of the emails casted doubt on the authenticity of the evidence.

However, Judge Francis went on to note that even if Rule 37(e) was construed not to apply to the facts of that case, the court could nevertheless remedy the spoliation by exercising its "inherent authority" to remedy an abuse of the judicial process. Ultimately, the court found the plaintiff's conduct to have been intentional and it awarded sanctions under Rule 37(e) in the form of an order precluding evidence or argument on a key point in the trademark case. Although it was therefore unnecessary for the court to award sanctions under its "inherent authority," Judge Francis noted that relief under that standard would have also been warranted.

This type of "exception" to the application of Rule 37(e) seems the most questionable and susceptible to improper extension, given the Advisory Committee's comment that the new Rule "forecloses reliance on inherent authority or state law to determine when certain measures should be used" to address spoliation, and the Committee's express rejection of Residential Funding. Based on the Committee's commentary, one can fairly conclude that Rule 37(e) was meant to be the sole source of authority for seeking relief for the spoliation or loss of ESI, and was not meant to merely provide an alternative to seeking relief under the court's "inherent authority" to sanction discovery misconduct.

As sanctions decisions under Rule 37(e) continue to roll in, t will certainly be interesting to continue looking out for references to the CAT3 opinion and the "inherent authority" doctrine.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.