United States: For Now, Residential Funding And "Inherent Authority" Doctrine For Spoliation Sanctions Live On

As noted in the Advisory Committee's commentary to the recently amended Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e), two goals of the amendments were: (1) to create uniformity among the Federal courts in imposing sanctions for the spoliation of electronically stored information, and (2) to prevent the imposition of harsh sanctions – such as an adverse inference instruction — for the merely negligent, or even grossly negligent, spoliation of ESI.

More specifically, the Committee's comment to amended Rule 37(e) points out that Federal circuit courts had established "significantly different standards for imposing sanctions or curative measures on parties who fail to preserve electronically stored information." Thus, the new rule "forecloses reliance on inherent authority or state law to determine when certain measures should be used" to address spoliation, although the commentary further points out that "the new rule applies only to electronically stored information."

The comments to Rule 37(e)(2) further clarify that the new rule "is designed to provide a uniform standard in federal court for use of these serious measures when addressing failure to preserve electronically stored information. It rejects cases such as Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2002), that authorize the giving of adverse inference instructions on a finding of negligence or gross negligence."

Since the amended Rules took effect on December 1, there have been a number of instances where Federal courts have continued to exert their "inherent authority" to sanction parties for the spoliation of evidence and/or apply the Residential Funding negligence or gross negligence standard. Perhaps not surprisingly, most of the cases clinging to the old standards are from the Second Circuit, where Residential Funding originated.

It appears that there are three primary reasons why courts have applied pre-amendment standards in favor of Rule 37(e).

1. Timing for the application of the new rules is "unjust" or "impractical"

First, some courts have declined to apply the new standards where it would be unjust to do so given the effective date of the new Rules. Noting that the amendments govern in all new proceedings filed after December 1, 2015, as well as all proceedings then pending "insofar as just and practical," a handful of courts have somewhat liberally determined that it would not be "just and practical" to apply the new Rule 37. For example, in McIntosh v. USA, 2016 WL 1274585 (S.D.N.Y. March 31, 2016), the court held that "it would fall short of justice and practicability" to apply the new Rule 37(e) to the Plaintiff's motion for sanctions, since "it makes sense to apply the old rules to motions briefed before the new rules came into effect." Similarly, in Thomas v. Butkiewicus, 2016 WL 1718368 (D.Conn. April 29, 2016), the court found that it was unjust to apply new Rule 37(e), which took effect 2½ years before the plaintiff's claim was filed, and long before the facts arose regarding the spoliation of the missing video at issue.

Presumably, these types of situations might eventually disappear, as the new Rule 37(e) becomes more uniformly applied to sanctions motions in all pending and newly filed cases.

2. Spoliation of evidence other than Electronically Stored Information.

As mentioned above, the Advisory Committee's comments to Rule 37(e) provide that "the new rule applies only to electronically stored information." Some courts have therefore continued to apply Residential Funding and its progeny in cases dealing with the spoliation of non-ESI evidence.

For example, in Coale v. Metro-North Railroad Co., 2016 WEL 1441790 (D.Conn. April 11, 2016), the defendant allegedly spoliated evidence by cleaning up and failing to preserve or identify the oily substance upon which the plaintiff slipped and fell. In finding that the defendant had a duty to preserve the substance, the court declined to apply Rule 37(e), which is "expressly cabined only to ESI and therefore does not disturb the present application of the Residential Funding rule." Similarly, in In re: Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc., 2016 WL 2755877 (S.D.N.Y. May 12, 2016), the court awarded an adverse inference under Residential Funding, where the spoliation related to loss of physical evidence in the form of a notebook or log book. In Best Payphones, Inc. v. City of New York, 2016 WL 792396 (E.D.N.Y. 2.26.16), the court actually applied both the Rule 37(e) framework for addressing the spoliation of emails, and the Residential Funding "gross negligence" standard for addressing the spoliation of tangible evidence in the form of bank statements and daily activity reports.

3. Loss of information not governed by Rule 37(e).

A third kind of exception to the Rule 37(e) framework was also suggested in CAT3, LLC v. Black Lineage, Inc., 2016 WL 154116 (S.D.N.Y. January 12, 2016). There, the court was faced with a motion for sanctions where the plaintiff migrated its emails to a new system, which caused the domain name on all of its emails to change. The plaintiff argued that notwithstanding the altered domain suffix on all of its emails, it had nevertheless produced its emails in the case, meaning that there was never really any "loss of information" or spoliation under Rule 37(e). Magistrate Judge James C. Francis disagreed and held that the ESI had not been restored or replaced because the different versions of the emails casted doubt on the authenticity of the evidence.

However, Judge Francis went on to note that even if Rule 37(e) was construed not to apply to the facts of that case, the court could nevertheless remedy the spoliation by exercising its "inherent authority" to remedy an abuse of the judicial process. Ultimately, the court found the plaintiff's conduct to have been intentional and it awarded sanctions under Rule 37(e) in the form of an order precluding evidence or argument on a key point in the trademark case. Although it was therefore unnecessary for the court to award sanctions under its "inherent authority," Judge Francis noted that relief under that standard would have also been warranted.

This type of "exception" to the application of Rule 37(e) seems the most questionable and susceptible to improper extension, given the Advisory Committee's comment that the new Rule "forecloses reliance on inherent authority or state law to determine when certain measures should be used" to address spoliation, and the Committee's express rejection of Residential Funding. Based on the Committee's commentary, one can fairly conclude that Rule 37(e) was meant to be the sole source of authority for seeking relief for the spoliation or loss of ESI, and was not meant to merely provide an alternative to seeking relief under the court's "inherent authority" to sanction discovery misconduct.

As sanctions decisions under Rule 37(e) continue to roll in, t will certainly be interesting to continue looking out for references to the CAT3 opinion and the "inherent authority" doctrine.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions