United States: Employer's Anti-Discrimination Complaint Process May Toll The Statute Of Limitations Under The Minnesota Human Rights Act

Recently, the Minnesota Court of Appeals, in Peterson v. City of Minneapolis, ruled that a complaint process in an employer's anti-discrimination policy may toll the statute of limitations under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA). At issue was a section of the MHRA stating that the Act's one-year statute of limitations is "suspended during the time period a potential charging party and respondent are voluntarily engaged in a dispute resolution process involving a claim of unlawful discrimination under this chapter." Minn. Stat. § 363A.28, subd. 3. The court of appeals held that the phrase "voluntarily engaged in a dispute resolution process" may include the process of investigating an employee's internal complaint of discrimination under an employer's anti-discrimination policy. This ruling, if not overturned on appeal, significantly expands the scope of what most employers would view as a proper tolling of the statute of limitations.

Discrimination Complaint and Lawsuit

Peterson was a Minneapolis police officer who filed a complaint of discrimination with the City of Minneapolis' Human Rights Department in November 2011. The City, however, did not complete an investigation of Peterson's complaint until January 2013, some 14 months later. Peterson then filed a charge of discrimination and, thereafter, a lawsuit alleging discrimination based on the allegations contained in the internal complaint.

At the district court level, the City moved for summary judgment asserting that Peterson's claim was time-barred because he had not filed it within one year of the alleged discriminatory act. In response, Peterson argued that his claim was timely because the statute of limitations was tolled during the time the City was investigating his complaint under its anti-discrimination policy. The district court rejected this argument and granted the City summary judgment on Peterson's claim.

Peterson's Appeal

On appeal, the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed the district court, holding that an employer's complaint process under an anti-discrimination policy may be considered a "dispute resolution process" in which the employer and the employee were "voluntarily engaged." In reaching this conclusion, the court relied on several cannons of statutory construction involving the language of the statute, and rejected all of the employer's arguments that a complaint process required by the MHRA cannot be a voluntary dispute resolution process.

The court of appeals' analysis in Peterson is strained. Relying on the concept that the MHRA is to be construed broadly, the court adopted what can only be viewed as a vastly overbroad view of "dispute resolution process." Indeed, a prior federal court decision with respect to this statute had ruled that it implied the presence of a third-party mediator.

The court of appeals failed to recognize that employers, like the City, are required to have anti-discrimination policies in place for the purpose of seeking to timely and appropriately investigate discrimination complaints and take action, if required. It is the employer's obligation to determine if its policy was violated and properly discipline any employee at fault—not "resolve" a "dispute" between the employer and its employee. Thus, the employer is not involved in a "dispute resolution process" between it and the employee; it is involved in an investigative process to determine whether the complaint is valid (e.g., "my co-worker discriminated against me") and impose appropriate discipline. This involves the employer as decision-maker, not as a participant in a "dispute resolution process." Indeed, in many instances, employees bring lawsuits asserting that the employer did not properly investigate the complaint or impose appropriate discipline. Claims such as these by employees demonstrate that employers who investigate discrimination complaints are not involved in attempting to resolve a dispute with an employee, but instead are being asked to determine if the complaint is valid and, if so, what discipline is appropriate.

Further, the court failed to consider a competing legal interest—wanting employers to investigate discrimination claims and handle employee complaints in a timely fashion. This interest may be adversely impacted by the court of appeals' decision in Peterson.

Finally, the court failed to consider what obligations a charging party, such as Peterson, has to timely bring a complaint of discrimination or be barred from doing so. Indeed, what likely affected the court's analysis is the fact that the City's investigation of the internal complaint took 14 months—longer than the statute of limitations itself. Nonetheless, there was nothing stopping Peterson from filing a complaint with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights despite the pendency of his internal complaint. The court, however, ignored any obligations Peterson had in this instance.

Practical Impact for Employers in Minnesota

Despite the apparent concerns with the analysis adopted by the court of appeals, Minnesota employers are currently required to take the Peterson holding into account. Practically speaking, employers should keep the following considerations in mind:

  1. Assure Timely Processing of Employee Complaints. Based on Peterson, Minnesota employers will now need to ensure that employee complaints are processed as expeditiously as possible, keeping in mind the overarching consideration of assuring proper investigation and analysis of the complaint. This may mean that employers will be required to pay closer attention to the timeframe within which a complaint is being processed.
  2. Modify an Anti-Discrimination Policy to Make Clear That it is Not a Dispute Resolution Process. One option for employers, in addition to timely processing of complaints, is to modify the employer's anti-discrimination policy to make clear that it does not involve a dispute resolution process, but rather a process by which the employee is investigating complaints and enforcing its policy. While this modification has not been approved or indicated by the court of appeals, it may demonstrate in other cases that the policy at issue is not a dispute resolution process governed by the statute.
  3. Be Mindful of Statute of Limitations Issues. Employers may now need to reconsider when the one-year MHRA statute of limitations will expire based on the length of the complaint process. Employers, at least for now, may need to exclude the period of the complaint process when calculating the statute of limitations. Employers would be wise to also formally "end" the complaint process by a written document sent to the complaining employee.

The Minnesota Supreme Court might consider the ruling in Peterson in the future. If and until that occurs, however, employers should take the ruling in Peterson into account going forward.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.