United States: Split 8th Circuit Rejects Class Certification In 10b-5 Case

In IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund v. Best Buy Co. Inc., Plaintiffs alleged that misleading statements by Best Buy officers made during a phone call with stock analysts artificially supported Best Buy's stock prices until a report issued three months later revealed a decline in sales. Defendants successfully defeated class certification by demonstrating that any increase in price of the Best Buy stock was attributable to nonfraudulent events.

1. Legal Framework for Class Certification in a Rule 10b-5 Class Action

To be certified, a proposed class must show that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members."  Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3). This predominance inquiry can be difficult for plaintiffs in a Rule 10b-5 fraud case, because one of the elements the plaintiffs must prove is reliance upon the misrepresentation or omission. Amgen, Inc. v. Conn. Ret. Plans & Tr. Funds, 133 S. Ct. 1184, 1192 (2013).

Rather than requiring every individual investor to prove how they would have acted if the misrepresentation was not made, the U.S. Supreme Court has set forth a rebuttable presumption of reliance in Rule 10b-5 cases where the plaintiffs trade on an impersonal market. The theory is that "the market price of shares traded on well-developed markets reflects all publicly available information," and "an investor who buys or sells stock at the price set by the market does so in reliance on the integrity of that price."  Basic, Inc. v. Levinson 485 U.S. 224, 246-47 (1988).

For this presumption to apply, Plaintiffs must demonstrate:

"(1) that the alleged misrepresentations were publicly known,

(2) that they were material,

(3) that the stock traded in an efficient market, and

(4) that the plaintiff traded the stock between the time the misrepresentations were made and when the truth was revealed." 

Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. (Halliburton II), 134 S. Ct. 2398, 2408 (2014).

However, plaintiffs in a Rule 10b-5 case are not required to prove materiality at the class certification stage. Amgen, Inc., 133 S. Ct. at 1197.

A Rule 10b-5 defendant can rebut the Basic presumption by showing an absence of price impact, that is, evidence that "severs the link between the alleged misrepresentation and either the price received (or paid) by the plaintiff, or his decision to trade at a fair market price."  Erica P John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co. (Halliburton I), 131 S.Ct. 2179, 2408 (2011).

Recently, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the presumption in Basic, holding that "Defendants must be afforded an opportunity before class certification to defeat the [Basic] presumption through evidence that an alleged misrepresentation did not actually affect the market price of the stock."  Halliburton II, 134 S. Ct. at 2417. The Court held that this evidence could be either direct or indirect evidence of price impact. Id. If a defendant rebuts the presumption, "a Rule 10b-5 suit cannot proceed as a class action," because individual questions of reliance will predominate over common questions of law and fact. Id. at 2416.

2. Alleged Misstatements by Best Buy Officers in IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund v. Best Buy Co., Inc. Litigation

At 8 a.m. on September 14, 2010, Best Buy issued a press release summarizing its financial performance for the second quarter of its fiscal year. Best Buy announced that it was increasing its full-year earnings per share (EPS) guidance by 10 cents to $3.55-3.70. Best Buy's common stock (BBY), which had closed on September 13 at $34.65, opened at 9:30 a.m. on September 14 at $37.25.

At 10 a.m. on the same day, CEO Brian J. Dunn and CFO Jim Muehlbauer of Best Buy held a conference call with stock analysts. On the conference call, Muehlbauer asserted that "we are pleased that our earnings are essentially in line with our original expectations for the year," and "we are on track to deliver and exceed our annual EPS guidance."  BBY closed on September 14 at $36.73.

After three months of BBY's price increases, Best Buy released a statement on December 14 at 8 a.m. reporting a decline in third quarter sales and announcing that it had reduced the FY 2011 EPS guidance to $3.20-$3.40. In a conference call after the market opened that day, Dunn and Muehlbauer discussed the "lower than expected" third-quarter sales. BBY's price, which had closed at $41.70 on December 13, closed at $35.52 on December 14.

3. The IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund v. Best Buy Co, Inc. Lawsuit and Class Certification Motion

Plaintiffs sued Best Buy and three of its executives ("Defendants"), alleging they violated SEC Rule 10b-5 by making fraudulent or recklessly misleading public statements in both the September 14 press release and the ensuing conference call. In ruling on Defendants' motion to dismiss, the district court distinguished between the press conference and the conference call on the basis that only the latter was "not forward-looking and . . . a statement of present condition."  Accordingly, the district court dismissed the claim based on the press release, but upheld the claim based on the conference call statements.

Relying on the Basic presumption to establish reliance, Plaintiffs moved for certification of a class consisting of all purchasers of Best Buy stock between September 14 and December 14, 2010. The district court certified the class, concluding that common questions predominate because Defendants failed to rebut the Basic presumption by establishing that the challenged statements did not impact the price of BBY. The district court held that "[e]ven though the stock price may have been inflated prior to the [conference call], the alleged misrepresentations could have further inflated the price, prolonged the inflation of the price, or slowed the rate of fall."  The district court also held that "price impact can be shown by a decrease in price following a revelation of the fraud" and that Defendants failed to "show that Best Buy's stock price did not decrease when the truth was revealed."

4. The 8th Circuit Reverses Class Certification

Defendants appealed this decision to the 8th Circuit. On appeal, Defendants did not contest that the alleged conference call misrepresentations were publicly made that Best Buy's stock traded in an efficient public market or the class definition. Instead, they argued that the district court had failed to correctly assess the evidence of price impact under the framework established by Basic and Halliburton II.

The 8th Circuit ruled 2-1 in favor of Defendants, reversing the district court's class certification order. Writing for the majority, Judge Loken held that the district court misapplied the price impact analysis mandated by Halliburton II. Judge Loken held that defendants had presented strong evidence that the conference call could not be linked to an increase in price on the front end, because Plaintiffs' expert had not adequately parsed the effect of these statements from the earlier press release. Furthermore, the majority was not convinced by Plaintiffs' theory that the price decrease on December 14 provided evidence of a price impact, because the allegedly "inflated price" was established by the nonfraudulent press release. To the majority, the statements on the conference call added nothing substantively different to the statements in the press release that were disclosed two hours before the call. The majority ruled that, since the district court had failed to conduct a "rigorous analysis" that closely examined the expert testimony, it had abused its discretion.

In dissent, Judge Murphy argued that Defendants had not rebutted the presumption of reliance, because they had not produced evidence showing that the alleged misrepresentations had not counteracted a price decline that would otherwise have occurred. She criticized the majority opinion for ignoring the theory that the conference call prevented the stock price from declining, thus departing from other circuits that recognize price maintenance theories as cognizable under the Securities Exchange Act.

5. Significance

Best Buy is a friendly application of the Halliburton II price impact analysis. To defeat class certification, Defendants can look to other events that took place very close to the time of the alleged misrepresentation to explain any increase in price of the stock. Under this standard, Plaintiffs will have difficulty certifying a class if the increase in price of a stock can be attributed to nonfraudulent events.

Especially when it comes to expert testimony, Plaintiffs must present unequivocal evidence of price impact at the class certification stage or risk having the Basic presumption rebutted. Plaintiffs will have to be careful to differentiate between different "events" when analyzing the effects of the alleged misrepresentations.

Furthermore, it is not clear that a "price maintenance theory" will be recognized in the 8th Circuit. Even where such a theory is recognized, Plaintiffs should do more than simply point to a drop in stock price after a misrepresentation is corrected. Plaintiffs should present evidence that the price would have declined had it not been for the misrepresentation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions