United States: MoFo New York Tax Insights - Volume 7 issue 4, April 2016

ALJ Holds That Insurance Payments to Captive Insurance Company Are Not Deductible

By Michael J. Hilkin

In Matter of Stewart's Shops Corp., DTA No. 825745 (N.Y.S. Div. of Tax App., Mar. 10, 2016), a New York State Administrative Law Judge concluded that a corporation operating a convenience store chain could not deduct on its New York corporate franchise tax returns the insurance payments that it made to its wholly owned captive insurance company because such payments would not qualify as valid insurance premiums under federal income tax law.

Facts. Stewart's Shops Corp. ("Stewart's Shops") owns and operates over 300 convenience stores in New York and Vermont. In the face of increasing insurance costs for its operations, Stewart's Shops started self-insuring certain of its risks in 1992. Subsequently, in late 2003 to early 2004, Stewart's Shops decided to create a captive insurance company, Black Ridge Insurance Corp. ("BRIC"), to insure some of its self-insured risks. BRIC received authorization to operate as a captive insurance company licensed by the New York State Insurance Department ("Insurance Department") and provided Stewart's Shops coverage for: (1) losses incurred within the threshold deductible amounts and in excess of the maximum losses covered by its outstanding policies with third-party insurance companies; (2) its self-insured risks and claims from periods before the formation of BRIC ("loss portfolio transfer"); and (3) other risks, including pollution, identity theft, and crime, for which it did not have any insurance at the time of the formation of BRIC.

In the months prior to the formation of BRIC, William Dake, Stewart's Shops' President, engaged in discussions with the Insurance Department's captive insurance group. Mr. Dake testified that, as a result of these discussions, he understood that insurance payments paid to a New York captive insurance company would be deductible for New York corporate franchise tax purposes and believed that Stewart's Shops could not create a stable captive insurance company "without deducting the payments made to BRIC." However, an Insurance Department representative involved in the discussions with Mr. Dake testified that he could not recall representing that the payments were deductible.

BRIC filed annual statements with the Insurance Department and was never contacted by the Insurance Department with any concerns about the annual statements. BRIC also paid New York insurance company franchise tax on the insurance payments from Stewart's Shops. In response to a 2004 tax refund claim from BRIC related to payments received for the loss portfolio transfer coverage, in 2005 the Department issued a letter stating that such payments were properly classified as taxable "premiums" for New York insurance company franchise tax purposes.

In 2010 and 2011, the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance audited BRIC and Stewart's Shops. The Department concluded that BRIC was subject to the insurance company franchise tax and could not be included in Stewart's Shops' combined corporate franchise tax returns because BRIC was an insurance corporation. Nonetheless, the Department also disallowed Stewart's Shops' deductions for insurance payments to BRIC, concluding that such payments would not be allowable deductions for federal income tax purposes. During the audit, Stewart's Shops had conceded that, for federal income tax purposes, the insurance contracts between it and BRIC did not qualify as insurance contracts, and that payments made on such contracts did not constitute insurance premiums.

The Law. New York's corporate franchise tax is calculated based on a corporation's entire net income ("ENI"), and ENI is defined by New York tax law as being "presumably the same as" a corporation's federal taxable income. Tax Law § 208(9). While New York calculates taxable ENI by making numerous adjustments and modifications to the federal taxable income amount, no such adjustments were relevant to Stewart's Shops' insurance payments to BRIC.

The Decision. Based on the language of Tax Law § 208(9), the Department argued that Stewart's Shops' insurance payments were not deductible for New York corporate franchise tax because such payments were not deductible for federal income tax purposes. Stewart's Shops, on the other hand, argued that the term "presumably" in Tax Law § 208(9) allows a departure from federal taxable income when accounting for Stewart's Shops' insurance payments to BRIC, and that such a departure is justified, in part because of the legislative history of New York's captive insurance law, which was designed to increase the number of captive insurance companies operating in the State.

The ALJ decided the first issue in the Department's favor, citing case law stating that "[f]ederal law controls for the purpose of defining 'entire net income'" unless there is a specific state departure. Matter of Dreyfus Special Income Fund, Inc. v. N.Y.S. Tax Comm'n, 126 A.D.2d 368, 372 (3d Dep't 1987), aff'd 72 N.Y.2d 874 (1988). The ALJ rejected Stewart's Shops' claim that New York Tax Law amendments requiring certain captive insurance companies to be included in a New York corporate franchise tax combined return affected such analysis and further concluded that Tax Law § 208(9) did not contain any ambiguity necessitating an examination of the legislative history of New York's captive insurance law.

Although Stewart's Shops had conceded during audit that its insurance payments to BRIC did not constitute insurance premiums for federal income tax purposes, the ALJ nonetheless conducted an independent analysis of federal law and reached the same conclusion. Specifically, the ALJ identified four criteria in determining the existence of insurance for federal income tax purposes: (1) the arrangement must involve insurable risk; (2) the arrangement must meet commonly accepted notions of insurance; (3) the arrangement must shift the risk of loss to the insurer; and (4) the insurer must distribute the risks among its policyholders. While the ALJ concluded that Stewart's Shops satisfied the first two criteria, she also determined that the insurance arrangements with BRIC did not shift the risk of loss or distribute risks among policyholders. The ALJ stated that numerous federal tax cases on the issue had a "common thread," in that "payments from a parent to a wholly-owned captive do not qualify as deductible insurance premiums because the arrangement lacks risk shifting and risk distribution."

The ALJ also rejected Stewart's Shops' claim that the Department was estopped from denying the deductibility of the insurance payments. The ALJ explained that the record did not support a conclusion that the Insurance Department made any representation related to the deductibility of insurance payments by Stewart's Shops to BRIC, and that the Department's letter to BRIC classifying insurance payments as premiums for New York insurance company franchise tax purposes had no bearing on the classification of such payments for federal income tax or New York corporate franchise tax purposes. However, the ALJ waived penalties in part because she found Stewart's Shops' reliance on such letter from the Department on the payments classification under the Insurance Law to be reasonable.

Additional Insights

The Stewart's Shops decision is notable because there is no prior New York precedent examining the deductibility of insurance payments to a captive insurance company. The decision suggests that the deductibility of insurance payments to captive insurance companies for New York corporate franchise tax purposes will generally depend on whether such insurance payments are properly classified as insurance premiums under federal income tax law. However, as decisions from New York ALJs are not precedential, additional guidance from the New York State Tax Tribunal may be necessary to bring further clarity to taxpayers.

Tribunal Holds That Furnishing of Retail Store Pricing Information is Subject to Sales Tax

By Irwin M. Slomka

In two related decisions, the Tax Appeals Tribunal has upheld the imposition of sales tax on the furnishing of retail grocery store pricing information, rejecting arguments made by the vendor and one of the vendor's clients that the information services qualified for the sales tax exclusion for information that is "personal and individual in nature." Matter of RetailData, LLC, DTA No. 825334 (N.Y.S. Tax App. Trib., Mar. 3, 2016); Matter of Wegmans Food Markets, Inc., DTA No. 825347 (N.Y.S. Tax App. Trib., Mar. 10, 2016). The Tribunal decisions make clear that where the source of the information being furnished is readily accessible to the general public – even if the information is not obtained from a common data base nor substantially incorporated into reports furnished to others – the "personal and individual" exclusion does not apply. The decisions relate to the same underlying services, the taxability of which was challenged by RetailData, LLC (the service provider) and by Wegmans Food Markets, Inc. ("Wegmans"), a supermarket chain and RetailData's largest New York client. RetailData provides price checking services for grocery and retail establishments throughout the United States, including New York State. RetailData principally conducts what are known as "competitive price audits" for its clients. This involves collecting pricing information on specified retail products – usually, comparable private label products – sold in a competitor's stores at specified locations. The pricing data is then validated and transmitted to clients electronically or in printed form. The information is obtained from publicly available sources, i.e., the prices of goods on display on sales floors and shelves in competitors' stores. This data is used by RetailData's clients, such as Wegmans, for their own pricing and marketing strategies. The pricing reports furnished by RetailData to one client were never sold to another client.

The Department assessed sales tax against RetailData for failing to collect and remit sales tax for the period June 1, 2005 through May 31, 2011, on the grounds that the company was providing a taxable information service. In a separate case involving the same services, Wegmans was assessed sales tax on the amounts it paid to RetailData for those services for the overlapping period June 1, 2007 through February 28, 2010. RetailData and Wegmans brought separate challenges to the assessments. ALJ Decision. An information service is not taxable if it (i) is personal and individual in nature to each client and (ii) is not or may not be substantially incorporated into reports furnished to other clients. Tax Law § 1105(c)(1). In two separate decisions issued by two different Administrative Law Judges (discussed in the March 2015 issue of New York Tax Insights), the ALJs held that the information services purchased by Wegmans from RetailData were not "personal and individual" in nature and therefore were subject to sales tax pursuant to Tax Law § 1105(c)(1). Neither taxpayer disputed that what was being furnished was an "information" service, so the only issue was whether the purchased information was "personal and individual in nature." The ALJs concluded that it is the source of the information that determines whether the information qualifies for the "personal and individual" exclusion, and it did not matter that the information did not come from a common database, government database, or a published database. These appeals followed.

Tribunal Decision. RetailData and Wegmans made essentially the same arguments before the Tribunal as they did before the ALJs, the thrust of which was that each report being furnished was tailored to a client's specific needs and was therefore never substantially incorporated into reports furnished to others, and that the information being provided in those reports was not derived from a common database, a governmental database, or a published database and was therefore "personal and individual" to each client.

The Tribunal affirmed both decisions, holding that the information being provided was not "personal and individual in nature" under Tax Law § 1105(c)(1). While noting that tax exclusions are to be strictly interpreted in the taxpayer's favor, the Tribunal also pointed out that the burden of proof still rested with the taxpayer to establish entitlement to the exclusion, concluding that the taxpayers' burden of proof was not met. The Tribunal held that in order to qualify for the "personal and individual" exclusion, the information must be "uniquely personal," citing Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. State Tax Comm'n, 115 A.D.2d 831, 834 (3d Dep't 1985), aff'd, 67 N.Y.2d 999 (1986). Since the information being furnished – the price of products on the shelves of supermarkets open to the public – was not "uniquely personal," it did not qualify for the exclusion. The fact that no two reports are likely to be the same because they were customized for each client did not change this conclusion.

The Tribunal also rejected the argument that whether information qualifies for the "personal and individual" exclusion depends on whether it is obtained from a common database, a government database, or a published database, factors which had been cited in other decisions involving information services. According to the Tribunal, the information did come from a "common source" that was not confidential and was widely accessible – non-confidential pricing information obtained from the shelves of competitor supermarkets that were open to the public, citing Matter of ADP Automotive Claims v. Tax App. Trib., 188 A.D.2d 245 (3d Dep't 1993) (upholding the imposition of sales tax on the furnishing of cost estimates for automobile repairs using information obtained from widely circulated publications). The Tribunal rejected the taxpayers' claim that only information taken from publicly accessible electronic databases or published bulletins ran afoul of the "personal or individual" exclusion.

Additional Insights

Unless reversed on appeal, these two Tribunal decisions establish a narrow interpretation of the "personal and individual" exclusion from taxable information services. Under the holdings in these two decisions, so long as the source of the information being furnished is publicly available, it does not matter that it was not obtained from a common database, or that it was not substantially incorporated into reports furnished to other clients. Although there is considerable case law holding that the provision of information obtained from a publicly accessible common database does not qualify as personal and individual, these two decisions extend the disqualifying publicly accessible database criteria to include any source of publicly available information. In that regard, Matter of RetailData and Matter of Wegmans are potentially important cases that may have a significant impact on the taxation of information services in New York State.

Although not discussed in the decisions, the Department should only be entitled to collect the sales tax once with respect to the information services furnished by RetailData to Wegmans.

To continue reading this newsletter, please click here

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.