United States: The First Circuit's "Scungy" Backpage: Copyright And Right Of Publicity Claims Ineffective Against Sex Trafficking

Last Updated: April 10 2016
Article by David A. Kluft

In Doe v. Backpage.com, the First Circuit affirmed the District of Massachusetts in holding that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) shields from civil liability a website used by third parties to facilitate the sex trafficking of underage girls.  If you haven't had a chance to follow the case, there are three basic takeaways: (1) the immunity provided by Section 230 of the CDA is very broad; (2) the judges are no happier about it than the plaintiffs; and (3) however you define the problem, intellectual property is not the solution.

Backpage Background

Backpage is an online classified advertising forum, the most profitable portion of which is what Judge Richard Stearns called a "scungy" adult entertainment section. This includes an "escorts" category in which users can find a local person who will trade sex for money, see pictures or videos of them, and then make contact.  According to the plaintiffs, Jane Does One through Three, this site has become a notorious haven for the promoters of the illicit trafficking of children for sex.  And they should know.  Jane Doe One claims that she was lured into the sex trade by a pimp when she ran away at 15 years old, and was raped over 1000 times in Massachusetts and Rhode Island as a result of being sold for sex through Backpage.com. Jane Does Two and Three have similarly grim tales.

In 2014, the plaintiffs brought a claim against Backpage in the District of Massachusetts pursuant to the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, which is supposed to provide victims of sex trafficking the right to bring a private civil action for restitution against "whoever knowingly benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value from participation in a venture which that person knew or should have known was engaged in an act in violation of this chapter." The plaintiffs alleged that Backpage knowingly profited from this industry by creating an environment friendly to child sex traffickers. Among other things, Backpage did not require verification of age or user identity, accepted anonymous payments, stripped out the metadata from photographs (which sets back law enforcement efforts), permitted key words such as "young" and "underage," and allowed intentional misspellings of otherwise barred terms such as "brly legal" and "high schl."

The Breadth Of CDA 230

Backgpage defended itself against these allegations, not by denying that its profits are in part derived from the sexual exploitation of children, but by claiming immunity under the CDA, which exempts interactive computer service providers from liability for content created by third parties. In other words, we didn't create these ads, so you can't sue us for them. The plaintiffs and amici asserted that Backpage forfeited its CDA immunity by creating a friendly environment for criminal activity.  However, the District Court held, and the First Circuit affirmed, that the website's "passivity and imperfect filtering system may be appropriate targets for criticism, but they do not transform Backpage into an information content provider" under any traditional interpretation of the CDA.

The plaintiffs then argued that the rationale for the traditional interpretation of the CDA — promoting the growth of the fledgling internet — is inapplicable here because: (1) the internet is no longer fledgling; and (2) who the hell wants this part of the internet to grow? The plaintiffs found sympathy for this position, but not relief.  Judge Stearns wrote that, if you don't like the outcome, complain to Congress, not to him, because he had "no choice" but to implement the legislature's policy decision to protect the economic well-being of the internet at the expense of less rigorous remedies against "abhorrent evil." The First Circuit doubled down on this non mea culpa, noting that while there was a "persuasive case" that Backpage "has tailored its website to make sex trafficking easier," nevertheless "the law requires that we, like the court below, deny relief to the plaintiffs whose circumstances evoke outrage."

IP Claims To the Rescue . . . Again . . . Not

The plaintiffs also brought claims for copyright infringement and violation of the Massachusetts and Rhode Island right of publicity statutes, based on the use of their photographs in the Backpage advertisements. In doing so, the plaintiffs attempted to take advantage of an exception to CDA immunity, Section 230(e)(2), which provides that the CDA cannot be "construed to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property." As we've frequently discussed on this blog, this exception has been the catalyst for many attempts to use IP law to remedy non-IP problems. And it almost never works. For example, copyright law is usually a poor substitute for defamation law, of dubious value against international fatwas, and even worse at stopping the destruction of the Indonesian rain forest.

Well, it turns out that IP law can be equally inept when called upon to battle child sex trafficking. As to the right of publicity claims, the plaintiffs alleged that Backpage profited from the use of their images for commercial purposes.  The District Court doubted that the right of publicity counts as "intellectual property" at all, but the First Circuit skipped this issue and held that the plaintiffs' right of publicity claims could not prevail because Backpage's uses of the photos were "incidental." Put another way, Backpage profited from the sale of space for advertisements that contained the photographs, but it was the pimps — not Backpage — who  benefitted from the misappropriation contained in those photographs.

As to the copyright claims, which the First Circuit identified as the "last leg of the journey," at least some of the photographs in the advertisements were selfies that the plaintiffs were forced to take at the time they were being trafficked. Plaintiffs tried to use these photographs as a vehicle both for enjoining parts of the website and for collecting damages. The First Circuit was skeptical that injunctive relief was appropriate because there was no substantial likelihood the photographs would be reused, now that the plaintiffs are no longer the subject of active advertisements. And in order to recover compensatory damages, the plaintiffs would have to show actual harm caused by the infringement to the value of the photographs, for example in the form of lost licensing fees. Here, however, the District Court noted that the plaintiffs alleged "no plausible link" between such harm and the alleged infringement and, in any event, the plaintiffs also failed to allege that the photographs had economic value.

Back up and tell me if that last point sounds right to you: the copyright claims were dismissed because pictures of undressed teenage girls don't have any economic value on the internet. Have we finally all gone through the looking glass? In fairness to Judge Stearns, he was talking about the allegations – not his findings.  But this disconnect demonstrates precisely why copyright law is often toothless in this type of situation. The plaintiffs brought this complaint because they were victims of a criminal rape industry, not because they didn't get enough money for licensing their art. You and I care mostly about the former harm. But copyright law was designed only to recognize the latter.

A Statutory Damages Coda

And finally – yes, I know about the statutory damages argument. Those still convinced that copyright law is a panacea for everything from revenge porn to bad restaurant reviews will point out that the Court left open the possibility of a statutory damages claim (and attorneys' fees) for registered works. Had the plaintiffs registered the copyright in their selfies in advance of the infringement, they could have sought damages and attorneys' fees without making the above-mentioned showing of actual harm. Very clever. But how exactly do you get a homeless teenage prostitute to spend her day off – which she doesn't have – registering selfies from her pimp's cell phone with the Copyright Office in the hopes of one day escaping her pimp and surviving a Rule 12(b)(6) motion on a slightly more viable copyright claim? See why that's not much help?

You can find the District Court opinion here and the First Circuit Opinion here, which issued March 14, 2016.  On March 30, 2016, the plaintiffs moved for en banc review on the grounds that the First Circuit panel failed to follow relevant precedent, and because of the importance of the underlying claims. We will keep you posted.

To view Foley Hoag's Trademark and Copyright Law Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
12 Oct 2018, Other, Boston, United States

The New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable has been meeting bimonthly since 1995 to discuss current topics related to important changes in the electric power industry in Massachusetts and throughout New England.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions