United States: IP Newsflash - March 18, 2016

FEDERAL CIRCUIT CASES

"Bust!" — Federal Circuit Deals Tough News to Inventors of Card Game

The Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) determination of unpatentability for claims covering new rules for a card game. The panel found the claims patentineligible under the Mayo twostep analysis for 35 U.S.C. § 101. First, they were directed to an abstract idea; second, they lacked an inventive concept sufficient to bridge the gap between abstract idea and invention.

In applying Mayo, the panel decided to stick with the Board's reasoning that the rules of a wagering game are like the ineligible methods from Alice (reducing risk in escrow settlement) and Bilski (reducing risk in price fluctuations) — wagering is "effectively, a method of exchanging and resolving financial obligations based on probabilities created during the distribution of the [playing] cards." Turning to the next step, the panel reasoned that the additional elements in the claims (shuffling and dealing) were like the additional elements in Alice of using a computer to implement an abstract idea. The panel found that these additional elements were not the ace in the hole that the applicants needed to trump the second step of Mayo.

While the panel kept these particular claims in the discard pile, it threw some dicta into the pot, stating that claims to "a game using a new or original deck of cards" might not be foreclosed from patenting under § 101.

In re Smith, No. 20151664 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2016).
[Stoll (opinion), Moore, Hughes]

Author: Jonathan Underwood

Dismissal on Forum non Conveniens Grounds Is Inappropriate Absent Evidence Showing that the Foreign Forum Can Provide an Adequate Remedy for U.S. Infringement

On March 14, 2016, the Federal Circuit reversed a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Illinois and held that dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds is improper when there is no evidence indicating that the foreign forum will provide an avenue for redress for the subject matter in dispute.

In this case, Appellant Halo, a Hong Kong private company that designs and sells highend furniture, sued appellee Comptoir, a Canadian corporation, in the Northern District of Illinois. Halo alleged that Comptoir infringed its U.S. design patents, copyrights and trademark. Halo also alleged that Comptoir violated the Illinois consumer fraud and deceptive business practices statutes. Comptoir moved to dismiss Halo's complaint on forum non conveniens grounds, arguing that the Federal Court of Canada provided a superior forum in which to resolve the dispute.

In reversing the district court's decision to grant Comptoir's motion to dismiss, the Federal Circuit stated that a forum non conveniens inquiry must consider whether an alternative forum is both adequate and available. In order to meet the adequacy requirement, the foreign forum must provide some potential avenue for redress of the subject matter in dispute. Here, the Federal Circuit held that the Federal Court of Canada was not an adequate alternative forum, because there was no indication that the Canadian court would adjudicate an intellectual property dispute where the alleged infringement occurred elsewhere, and there was no evidence to support the proposition the Canadian court would apply U.S. law. The Federal Circuit further noted that the requirement that a movant demonstrate adequacy of an alternative forum is particularly important in intellectual property cases due to the territoriality concerns raised by these disputes.

Halo Creative & Design Ltd. v. Comptoir Des Indes Inc., No. 151375 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 14, 2016).
[Dyk (opinion), Mayer, Hughes]

Author: Rachel J. Elsby

DISTRICT COURT CASES

Court Finds Computer-Based Map Navigator Patent Invalid Under Section 101

A district court in Virginia has found a patent related to a navigation system that assists users in locating stores to be directed to an unpatentable abstract idea. U.S. Patent No. 6,397,143 (the "'143 patent"), titled "Layout based method for map navigation" was issued to Inventor George Peschke in 2002. The patent is directed to a computer-based map navigation system that provides a "visual presentation of a shopping center" to the user and assists the user in locating stores and businesses in and around the shopping mall. Each store shown on the visual presentation can be clicked to view a description page about that store. Last year, Peschke sued Rouse Properties Inc. for infringement of the '143 patent, alleging that Rouse's website for a shopping mall uses a computerized mapping system. Rouse moved to dismiss the suit under Section 101. The court granted Rouse's motion, finding that the asserted claims were directed toward an abstract idea.

The court found the use of multiple layers of maps that enables users to zoom into and out of a geographic area to be an unpatentable abstract idea. The court stated that "maps of cities have long existed that depict structures and include identifying marks that direct a user to information about those structures." The court found no innovative concept in the use a "nontext based system" used to provide a user with information about a particular store; nor did the court agree that the patent addresses a challenge particular to computers or the Internet. According to the court, the patent merely "addresses a problem 'known from the preInternet world': navigating through maps and locating information about structures appearing on those maps." Further, the court noted that, because the subject matter of the claims is readily ascertainable from the face of the '143 patent, claim construction is not necessary for the court to consider the patenteligibility of the claims, and a Section 101 analysis is properly conducted at the 12(b)(6) stage. The court therefore dismissed Peschke's suit.

Peschke Map Techs. LLC v. Rouse Properties, Inc., No. 115cv01365 (E.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2016) (O'Grady).

Author: Manoj Gandhi

E.D. Tex. Judge Denies Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Based in Part on Expert Testimony

Judge Gilstrap of the Eastern District of Texas denied defendant Genband US LLC's motion for summary judgment that plaintiff Metaswitch Networks Ltd.'s patent, relating to the control of communication sessions in a telecommunications network, was invalid. Metaswitch argued that the prior art patent application is fundamentally different from the asserted patent and does not disclose even a single limitation of the asserted claim 8. In general, Metaswitch's arguments related to the asserted patent and prior art reference having different network topologies.

In denying the motion for summary judgment, the court found that "Metaswitch raise[d] material factual issues about whether [the patent application] actually fact [sic] discloses the limitations of claim 8 . . ." and "cite[d] the testimony of its expert . . . to support its position." Specifically, the court stated that "Metaswitch's arguments, supported by evidence and expert testimony, create material fact questions that defeat summary judgment on the issue of anticipation under § 102. These same fact questions, combined with additional disputes on the issue of whether the [reference used in combination] was publicly available, whether one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine [patent application] and [combination reference], and whether secondary considerations undermine a finding of obviousness, compel denial of summary judgment on § 103 grounds as well."

Metaswitch Networks Ltd. et al. v. Genband US LLC et al., 214cv00744 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 10, 2006). (J. Gilstrap).

Author: Jay K. Tatachar

PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

PTAB Finds That Petitioner Failed to Prove Anticipation of Claims from Patents Covering Self-Testing Memory Modules

In two related inter partes reviews (IPRs) decided on March 9, 2016, a PTAB panel issued final written decisions holding that Smart Modular Technologies Inc. (Petitioner) failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that any challenged claim is invalid as anticipated. The patents at issue had previously been the subject of IPRs, brought by a different party. In those previous IPRs the PTAB held that the petitioner had proven some, but not all, claims obvious or anticipated based on very similar prior art as that raised by Smart Modular here.

In its institution decision, the PTAB construed the term "generate" to mean "produce or cause." In its response, the patent owner argued that the term should be construed as only "produce" and that a construction including "cause" is inconsistent with the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence. In its reply, Petitioner disagreed and argued that the PTAB was correct in its institution decision. In its final written decision, the PTAB determined that, consistent with its construction of these same terms in the previous IPRs, the broadest reasonable construction of "generate" was "produce." Petitioner's evidence here did not convince the panel otherwise. Accordingly, the PTAB changed the construction it had used in the institution decision and construed "generate" to mean "produce." Under this construction, the PTAB found that Petitioner failed to show that the cited reference included every claim element, and, accordingly, Petitioner had failed to prove the claims anticipated. This may be a case where the difference between the 'broadest reasonable interpretation' standard, currently applied by the PTAB, and the Phillips standard for claim construction applied by the district courts could have a material impact on the ultimate outcome.

Smart Modular Techs. Inc. v. Netlist, Inc., IPR201401372; IPR201401374 (PTAB Mar. 9, 2016).
[Gaudette (opinion), Moore, Chen]

Author: Jason Weil

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions