United States: March 2016 Employee Benefits Update

Compliance Deadlines and Reminders

Upcoming Health Plan Compliance Deadlines and Reminders

  1. Forms 1095‑B and 1095‑C. Forms 1095-B and 1095-C must be distributed to participants and filed with the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). Plan sponsors of self-funded health plans and Applicable Large Employers ("ALE") must provide Forms 1095‑B and 1095‑C to employees by March 31, 2016. Plan sponsors and ALEs should also file these forms with the IRS by May 31, 2016 (or June 30, 2016, if filing electronically, which is required for entities filing at least 250 ACA reports).
  2. Forms 1094‑B and 1094‑C. Plan sponsors and ALEs must file the first forms 1094-B and 1094-C with the IRS no later than May 31, 2016 (or June 30, 2016, if filing electronically). These forms serve as transmittal forms for the Forms 1095-B and 1095-C.

Upcoming Retirement Plan Compliance Deadlines and Reminders

  1. Form 1099-R. The deadline to electronically file Form 1099-R to report the prior year's distributions is March 31, 2016.
  2. Required Minimum Distributions. Required minimum distributions must begin by April 1, 2016 for participants who reached age 70-1/2 in 2015 and who have terminated employment.
  3. Annual Funding Notice. Calendar year defined benefit plans with over 100 participants must provide the annual funding notice to required recipients by April 29, 2016 (e., within 120 days of the end of the plan year). Small plans (plans with 100 or fewer participants) generally have until the Form 5500 filing deadline to provide the annual funding notice.

Retirement Plan Developments

IRS Provides Guidance on Mid-Year Changes to Safe Harbor Plans

The IRS issued Notice 2016-16 to provide guidance on mid-year changes to safe harbor plans under Code sections 401(k) and 401(m). The guidance also applies to Code section 403(b) plans that apply the Code section 401(m) safe harbor rules. A "mid-year change" is a change that becomes effective after the beginning of a plan year or a change that is adopted after the beginning of the plan year but is retroactively effective as of the beginning of the plan year. Under the new guidance, mid-year changes to a safe harbor plan or to a safe harbor notice do not violate the safe harbor rules as long as the plan satisfies the applicable notice and election opportunity conditions, and the mid-year change is not a prohibited mid-year change.

To comply with the new guidance's notice requirements, an updated safe harbor notice that describes the mid-year change and its effective date must be sent to each employee who is required to receive a safe harbor notice within a reasonable period before the effective date of the change. The timing requirement will be deemed to be satisfied if the notice is provided at least 30 days and not more than 90 days before the effective date of the change. For retroactively effective changes, and for changes for which it is not practicable to provide an election opportunity before the effective date, the notice will be considered timely if it is provided as soon as practicable, but no more than 30 days after the adoption of the change. If the information about the mid-year change was previously provided with the annual safe harbor notice, an updated notice is not required.

To comply with the new guidance's election requirements, employees who are required to receive a safe harbor notice must have a reasonable opportunity before the effective date of the mid-year change to modify their cash or deferred elections and any after-tax employee contribution elections. A 30-day election period will be considered reasonable. For retroactively effective changes, and for changes for which it is not practicable to provide an election opportunity before the effective date, an employee will be deemed to have a reasonable opportunity to modify an election if the election opportunity begins as soon as practicable after the updated notice is provided, but no later than 30 days after the date of the adoption of the change.

Unless required by law, the following mid-year changes are prohibited: (1) mid-year change to increase the years of service required for an employee to have a nonforfeitable right to amounts in the employee's account attributable to safe harbor contributions under a qualified automatic contribution arrangement ("QACA"); (2) mid-year change to reduce the number or narrow the group of employees who are eligible to receive safe harbor contributions; (3) mid-year change that alters the type of safe harbor plan; and (4) mid-year change to (i) modify or add a formula for determining matching contributions (or a change to the definition of compensation for purposes of determining matching contributions) if the change increases matching contribution amounts or (ii) permit discretionary matching contributions. This fourth prohibition does not apply if the change is adopted and updated safe harbor notices and election opportunities are provided at least three months before the end of the plan year and if the change is retroactively effective for the whole plan year.

This guidance is effective for mid-year changes made on or after January 29, 2016. The guidance revokes Announcement 2007-59, which limited permissible changes to changes that implemented a qualified Roth contribution program or changes to hardship withdrawals.

Federal District Court Rules that Custodial Agreement Must be Disclosed in ERISA Document Request

A district court judge in the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania determined that a custodial agreement between a 401(k) plan and Nationwide Trust Company must be provided when requested under ERISA section 104(b)(4). In Askew v. R.L. Reppert, Inc., the court determined that the custodial agreement was a contract or other instrument "under which the Plan is established or operated." Accordingly, the custodial agreement was required to be disclosed under ERISA section 104(b)(4). In making its decision, the court noted that the custodial agreement contained information regarding the participants' benefits, such as schedules of investment funds in which participants may choose to invest and information regarding the default investment. The court also found that the custodial agreement established details regarding where and how benefits would be invested and who would manage and administer participant accounts. Although this ruling is not precedential, plan sponsors should be aware that some courts may interpret ERISA section 104(b)(4) to require disclosure of custodial agreements upon a participant's request.

Treasury Releases Proposed Regulations to Implement Benefit Suspension Provisions of Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 ("MPRA")

The United States Department of the Treasury issued proposed regulations regarding the suspension of benefits under MPRA. MPRA allows multiemployer pension plans in "critical and declining status" to suspend accrued benefits under certain circumstances. The proposed regulations provide guidance regarding plans that cover participants who worked for employers that withdrew from the plan before MPRA went into effect. Specifically, the proposed regulations set forth the limits that apply to suspensions of benefits for multiemployer plans directly attributable to a participant's service with an employer that completely withdrew from the plan, paid its complete withdrawal liability and assumed in a collective bargaining agreement liability to provide benefits in a make-whole plan that are equal to benefits reduced due to the multiemployer plan's financial health ("make-whole agreement"). The regulations provide that, to the maximum extent permissible, a suspension of benefits must first apply to benefits for service with an employer who did not agree to assume liability for benefits under a make-whole agreement ("Subclause 1 Employers"). Thereafter, a suspension may apply to benefits related to service for other employers (i.e., other than Subclause I and III Employers), but only if the suspension with respect to the Subclause I Employers is not reasonably estimated to allow the plan to avoid becoming insolvent. For this second group, the suspension does not need to apply to the maximum extent permitted, but may not be less than reductions that are applied to Subclause III Employers. Finally, the suspension may be applied to benefits for service for a Subclause III Employer.

Federal District Court Determines 401(k) Plan Divestment Decision Was Objectively Prudent

On remand from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, a North Carolina federal district court determined that even though 401(k) plan fiduciaries did not engage in a prudent process in deciding to divest stock, the fiduciaries were not personally liable for resultant losses because a prudent fiduciary would have made the same decision. In Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., the Benefits Committee of the R.J. Reynolds 401(k) plan decided to eliminate Nabisco funds from the 401(k) plan after the tobacco portion of the business spun off from Nabisco. In making its decision, the Benefits Committee relied on the recommendation of a company working group and did not meet or discuss the issue. The Benefits Committee did not vote on the issue and also did not create an amendment to document the divestment. Employees filed a class action lawsuit to recover losses caused by the divestment and alleged that the Benefits Committee and the Investment Committee breached their fiduciary duties. The district court found that R.J. Reynolds failed to comply with its duty of prudence but was not liable for any damages because a prudent fiduciary would have made the same decision even if it had exercised the required procedural prudence. Thus, the decision was objectively prudent. The court considered the fiduciaries' obligations under the plan document, the risk versus the potential return of the investments and the timing of investment decisions. Although this ruling suggests that some courts may allow plan fiduciaries to escape liability if their decisions are objectively prudent, the safer approach is for fiduciaries to ensure that they are engaging in a prudent process and documenting the process before making decisions.

IRS Releases Internal Memorandum Regarding Normal Retirement Ages of 55 and Older

The IRS released an Internal Memorandum on February 23, 2016 to provide guidelines for Employee Plans Determinations and Examinations employees who review multiemployer plans that contain a normal retirement age ("NRA") that is earlier than age 62 but no earlier than age 55. The guidelines provide that if the plan is maintained pursuant to at least one collective bargaining agreement and is a multiemployer plan, an NRA should be considered reasonably representative of the industry's typical retirement age as required by the Internal Revenue Code. The guidance is effective as of February 23, 2016.

IRS Indicates Plan Sponsors Should Skip Certain Questions on Form 5500

Recently, the IRS indicated that plan sponsors should not answer the optional questions on Schedule R (Part VII, lines 20a-c, 21a-b, 22a-d and 23), which relate to compliance with various Internal Revenue Code requirements. Initially, the IRS encouraged plan sponsors to answer those optional questions but has since changed its mind. Plan Sponsors should also skip Lines 4o, 4p, 6a, 6b, 6c and 6d on Schedule H and Schedule I and should not complete the preparer information on the bottom of page 1 of Form 5500. On Form 5500-SF, plan sponsors should not complete the preparer information on the bottom of page 1, Lines 10j, 14a-d and New Part IX (lines 15a-c, 16a-b, 17a-d, 18, 19 and 20). The questions that should be skipped on Schedules H and I and on Form 5500-SF generally relate to Internal Revenue Code requirements and information regarding the trust.

Health and Welfare Plan Developments

Federal Court Declines to Dismiss Case Against Employer for Reducing Work Schedules

A judge in the Southern District of New York has denied a motion to dismiss a class action against Dave & Buster's, Inc. that alleges that Dave & Buster's impermissibly reduced employees' hours to avoid having to provide health insurance under the Affordable Care Act. The shared responsibility requirements in the ACA require applicable large employers ("ALE") to offer minimum essential health coverage to substantially all full-time employees. If ALEs do not comply with this requirement, employers could be subject to penalties. The plaintiff employees allege that the reduction of hours constitutes a violation of ERISA section 510, which prohibits employers from discriminating against participants or interfering with participant's ability to attain any right to which the participant may become entitled. The employees were working full-time and were eligible for medical coverage until their hours were reduced. The court noted that the complaint alleged sufficient facts to support a finding that Dave & Buster's intentionally impeded the employees' rights to receive benefits, as the complaint referred to e-mails and other evidence that Dave & Buster's was trying to avoid incurring ACA-related expenses. This case is not final, but it demonstrates that judges may be willing to hear challenges related to reductions in employee hours if the reduction is intended to avoid ACA coverage requirements. Future decisions in this case may have greater implications for employers.

Proposed Revisions to Summary of Benefits and Coverage Template Have Been Issued

On February 26, 2016, the Department of Labor ("DOL"), Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") and Department of the Treasury proposed changes to the Summary of Benefits and Coverage ("SBC") template that incorporates many of the recommendations from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC"). Overall, the revised template is substantially similar to the previous version of the proposed revised template. The most notable changes involve the coverage examples, which will require self-funded plan sponsors to review and compare current SBC provisions to the revised examples. One of the changes requires plans to indicate whether the plan provides minimum essential coverage and whether the plan meets minimum value standards. The revised template also requires plans to provide information regarding abortion services coverage, which information is not required for self-funded plans. In addition to revising the SBC template, the proposed changes include an updated uniform glossary and instructions. Comments on the revised template are due by March 28, 2016.

Improving Health Coverage for Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Patients Report to Congress

The DOL submitted a report to Congress titled "Improving Health Coverage for Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Patients Including Compliance with the Federal Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Parity Provisions." As part of the report, the DOL distributed questions to stakeholder groups and invited the groups to share their thoughts. Some of the main concerns surrounded transparency, disclosure and what actions are required to comply with the regulations.

Stakeholders representing health plans and behavioral health organizations indicated that they believed that the grant or denial of benefits standing alone does not necessarily indicate compliance, but major discrepancies in denial rates between mental health and medical/surgical benefits is a red flag for noncompliance with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act ("MHPAEA"). In response to a question regarding what documents the DOL should request from group health plans to check for MHPAEA compliance, stakeholders suggested that the DOL review medical management documents, among others, to obtain information on the medical necessity criteria. Stakeholders also suggested that it would be helpful if the DOL could provide model language for medical necessity criteria and non-quantitative treatment limitations.

Consumer and provider groups designated the lack of transparency for health plan decision making as a major concern. This lack of transparency appears to stem from health plans' concerns about disclosing proprietary practices. However, the Parity Implementation Coalition ("PIC") noted that MHPAEA and ERISA require disclosure of medical necessity criteria and guidelines. The PIC provided positive comments on the final MHPAEA regulations regarding disclosure, but worried that the disclosure regulations are not being enforced. The report highlights the stakeholders' concerns and may give some indication as to where enforcement efforts may be focused.

Sixth Circuit Determines that Employer May Modify Retiree Medical Benefits

In Gallo v. Moen, the Sixth Circuit determined that collective bargaining agreements ("CBA") did not provide vested healthcare benefits for the life of retirees and their dependents. The court applied an ordinary contract analysis and noted that nothing in the CBAs required the employer to provide unalterable benefits to retirees. The Moen case follows a United States Supreme Court decision that rejected the Sixth Circuit's presumption that collectively bargained medical benefits for retirees were vested at retirement unless there was clear evidence demonstrating that the benefits would not vest. The Moen case suggests that the Sixth Circuit will now interpret collective bargaining agreements according to ordinary contract principles and will not presume vesting of collectively bargained retiree medical benefits.

Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights Issues Guidance Regarding Mobile Application Developer Compliance with HIPAA

The Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights issued guidance regarding the application of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA") to mobile applications ("apps"). The guidance suggests that when individuals download a health app and input protected health information ("PHI"), the developer will not generally be a business associate subject to HIPAA unless it creates, receives, maintains and transmits PHI on behalf of a covered entity. For example, if a consumer downloads a blood pressure app and inputs PHI, the developer is not a business associate. In addition, if a health care provider enters an interoperability arrangement that allows information to be exchanged between the provider electronic health record and the app at the consumer's request, the app developer is not a business associate because the interoperability arrangement was put in place at the consumer's request. However, if the provider contracts with the app developer for patient management services, and the data that the patient inputs is incorporated into his or her electronic health record, the app developer would be a business associate.

Department of Health and Human Services Issues Final Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2017

On March 8, 2016, the HHS issued the final Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2017 (the "Final Notice"). The Final Notice does not include significant changes from the proposed notice issued in November 2015 but does contain some clarifications.

The premium adjustment percentage for 2017 is 13.2%. Accordingly, for 2017, the maximum in-network out-of-pocket limits for non-grandfathered plans will increase to $7,150/person and $14,300/family. The annual employer shared responsibility penalties will increase to $2,260 for the 4980H(a) penalty and $3,390 for the 4980H(b) penalty.

The Final Notice also provides that for benefit years beginning on or after January 1, 2019, the Exchanges will offer a shorter annual open enrollment period. Annual open enrollment will run from November 1 of the year preceding the benefit year through December 15 of the same year, starting with the 2019 benefit year. Open enrollment periods for the 2017 and 2018 benefit years will continue to run from November 1 of the year preceding the benefit year through January 31 of the benefit year.

The Final Notice does not make substantial changes to the notices of premium tax credit eligibility described in the proposed Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters. The current HHS rules require Exchanges to provide a notice to employers if an employee is determined to be eligible for a premium tax credit. The Final Notice provides employers with advance warning of a potential shared responsibility penalty so that the employer can appeal the determination, if necessary. However, as provided in the proposed Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters, because the shared responsibility penalty is not triggered unless a full-time employee receives a premium tax credit and enrolls in a qualified health plan ("QHP"), HHS has determined that it would be more accurate to send the notice only if the employee is determined eligible for a premium tax credit and the employee enrolls in a QHP on the Exchange. The Final Notice revises the rule accordingly. Additionally, the Exchanges can send a notice to employers each time an employee enrolls in a QHP and receives a premium tax credit or the Exchange could notify employers for groups of employees. The Exchange must send the notices within a "reasonable timeframe" following any month an employee is determined eligible for a premium tax credit and enrolls in a QHP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.