United States: State, Local Taxes On Tribal Leases Vulnerable After California Court Order

Steven D. Gordon is a Partner and Kenneth W. "Ken" Parsons is an Associate in our Washington, D.C. office.

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • A California district court recently issued an order that signals it is likely to invalidate Riverside County's imposition of a possessory interest tax on lessees of trust lands within the reservation of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians.
  • The court analyzed several previous cases, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) leasing regulations and the Bracker balancing test, which is designed to determine whether the exercise of state authority violates federal law.
  • As a result of the changing landscape, tribes are now in a position to argue that many lease-related state and local taxes are preempted by federal law even if those taxes have been upheld by courts in the past.

Indian country may be close to another victory against state and local taxes. On Feb. 8, 2016, a California district court issued an order that signals it is likely to invalidate Riverside County's imposition of a possessory interest tax on lessees of trust lands within the reservation of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (the Tribe). The case is Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Riverside County, et al, Case. No. ED-CV-14-007-DMG (C.D. Calif. 2014).

The Dispute

Riverside County assesses a possessory interest tax on the lessees of the Tribe's trust lands. The tax is a general revenue-generation tax, which the Tribe alleges has no direct nexus with services provided by Riverside County to the Tribe or its members.

On Jan. 2, 2014, the Tribe filed a complaint against Riverside County seeking to invalidate the tax. Although Riverside County assesses the possessory interest tax against lessees, the Tribe alleges that the economic burden of the tax falls at least in part on the Tribe and its members. In particular, the Tribe alleges that the levy of the possessory interest tax lowers the lease value of its trust lands and costs the Tribe tax revenue. (The Tribe foregoes the imposition of a tribal tax on lessees of its trust lands in order to prevent double taxation.)

On July 28, 2014, Riverside County filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The court denied this motion on Feb. 8, 2016. Although this ruling does not finally decide the case, the court's reasoning indicates that it is likely to invalidate the tax when it does issue a final decision.

The Court's Analysis

Bracker Abrogates Earlier Cases

The court began its analysis by discussing the Supreme Court's decision in White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980). In Bracker, the Supreme Court established a test for assessing the validity of state laws taxing the conduct of non-Indians on tribal land. When a state asserts authority over the conduct of non-Indians engaging in on-reservation activity, Bracker calls for a "particularized inquiry into the nature of the state, federal, and tribal interests at stake." This inquiry – the Bracker balancing test – is designed to determine whether the exercise of state authority violates federal law.

Prior to the Bracker decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit twice held that a possessory interest tax on non-Indian lessees of trust land was not preempted by federal law. In the first case, Agua Caliente Band of Mission Indians v. County of Riverside, 442 F.2d 1184 (9th Cir. 1971), the Ninth Circuit upheld the possessory interest tax because it found no congressional action forbidding the tax. In the second case, Fort Mojave Tribe v. County of San Bernardino, 543 F.2d 1253 (9th Cir. 1976), the Ninth Circuit examined Public Law 280, which prohibits the "alienation, encumbrance, or taxation of any real or personal property ... belonging to any Indian or any Indian tribe." The court found, however, that the burden of the tax at issue fell on the lessees, not the Tribe, and therefore the tax did not constitute a clear violation of the statutory prohibition on taxation.

The district court found that Bracker and other decisions issued since 1976 have abrogated Agua Caliente and Fort Mojave. In Bracker, the court noted, the Supreme Court "rejected the proposition that in order to find a particular state law to have been preempted by operation of federal law, an express congressional statement to that effect is required." Rather, in the Indian law context, state law is preempted not only by explicit congressional statement, but also if the balance of federal, state and tribal interests favors preemption. Because "the legal landscape has changed since Agua Caliente and Fort Mojave were decided," the court concluded it is "not bound by those decisions."

BIA Leasing Regulations

The court also examined regulations issued by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in November 2012 addressing the leasing of rights in Indian lands. Those regulations provide, in part, that:

Subject only to applicable federal law, the leasehold or possessory interest is not subject to any fee, tax, assessment, levy, or other charge imposed by any state or political subdivision of the state. Leasehold or possessory interests may be subject to taxation by the Indian tribe with jurisdiction.

In the preamble to the regulations, the BIA states that the federal statutes and regulations governing leasing of Indian lands "occupy and preempt the field of Indian leasing" and that the federal statutory scheme is "comprehensive" and "pervasive," such that it "precludes state taxation." The preamble also asserts that "[a]ssessment of state and local taxes would obstruct federal policies supporting tribal economic development, self-determination, and strong tribal governments."

Although the court noted that it is not required to defer to the BIA's "proclamations of preemption," it also found that the BIA's authority to promulgate regulations is broad, and Riverside County had not convinced the court that the regulation goes beyond the scope of that authority:

In this case, the regulation at issue plainly states that a possessory interest in reservation land is not subject to any state tax. To the extent that Defendants assess, levy, and collect a possessory interest tax on the lessees of the reservation trust lands, the federal and state laws are in direct conflict. Given the broad scope of the authority granted to the BIA, and its historic role in regulating the use of Indian reservation lands, particularly leases, Defendants have not presented convincing arguments that this regulation goes beyond the scope of the BIA's authority.

Bracker Balancing Test Applies

Although the court found Riverside County's possessory interest tax to be in direct conflict with the BIA's leasing regulations, it concluded that the Bracker balancing test must still be applied to determine whether the county's tax is preempted. In applying this test, the court looked to the interests of the federal government, the tribe and Riverside County.

  • With respect to the federal interest, the court found the purposes of the relevant federal laws, the comprehensiveness of the regulatory scheme and the BIA's analysis of the issue all weighed in favor of a strong federal interest in promoting uniformity in the governance of tribal leasing.
  • The court found that the facts alleged by the Tribe (including declining to collect its own taxes so as to avoid double taxation on its lessees in light of the possessory interest tax) constituted a strong tribal interest that would be frustrated by the imposition of the possessory interest tax.
  • The court found Riverside County's generalized interest in raising revenue insufficient to "overcome the strong tribal and federal interests at stake."

Ultimately, the court found that, for purposes of deciding the motion before it, the possessory interest tax on lessees of the Tribe's land is preempted under the Bracker balancing test.

Next Steps

The court's ruling signals that it is likely to rule in the Tribe's favor at trial. However, discovery in the case will continue and a trial remains possible. In its order, the court raised two areas in which further factual development would be appropriate as the case moves forward.

The first area is the financial burden the tax imposes on the Tribe. The court noted:

The full extent of the financial burden on the Tribe cannot be assessed without a more developed factual record, but the facts as alleged are that the Tribe and its members have entered into thousands of leases providing considerable financial support to the Tribe, and that it is forbearing the imposition of its own taxes on these leases pending a determination of the issues presented in this case.

The second area is how Riverside County currently spends the tax revenues. The court noted:

According to the Complaint, the [possessory interest tax] at issue is a general revenue-generating tax that has no apparent connection to any services provided by Riverside County to the Tribe or its members. The majority of the revenues from the PIT are spent outside of the Tribe's Reservation, and a substantial percentage is spent outside the Coachella Valley altogether.

The court indicated that evidence would need to be developed that either proved or disproved these allegations.

Changed Landscape Offers Opportunities for Tribes

The application of state and local taxes to Indian country is a complicated and intricate area of the law. But the legal landscape has been changed by the Supreme Court's decision in Bracker, coupled with the publication of the BIA leasing regulations in 2012. As a result, tribes are now in a position to argue that many lease-related state and local taxes are preempted by federal law. Even if those taxes have been upheld by courts in the past, those prior rulings may no longer be good law. Accordingly, tribes that find themselves burdened by lease-related state and local taxes should consult with counsel to determine whether those taxes can be successfully challenged.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions