United States: Apple vs. The FBI: Why The Stakes Have Never Been Higher

Last Updated: March 8 2016
Article by S. Gregory Boyd

This article originally appeared in Mashable.com

The one thing we know about privacy and data security is that we have neither. Those words are more true every day and if a federal judge gets her way, the state of privacy throughout the world is about to get a lot worse.

Apple is currently wrestling with the FBI and Department of Justice, resisting a demand to build a backdoor to its iPhone, which would expose all the information contained on the device. This is one of the most important legal questions to ever be raised in society's unending struggle to balance public safety and personal liberty.

SEE ALSO: The FBI says the tool it wants Apple to build could remain secret. Would it?

Whatever decision ultimately comes down in this case will send shockwaves into the future, and be essential in shaping policy and technological decisions regarding digital privacy. But in trying to understand the forces influencing this decision, it's informative to view the situation in a historical context. While the challenges that face every era are unique, we can learn from the reactions — and sometimes overreactions — to when similar issues arose in the past.

How this all started

First some essential background on the current case:

On Dec. 2, 2015, Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, killed 14 people and injured 22 others, including a police officer, in San Bernardino California at a holiday party for the County Public Health Department. Their attack was one of deadliest terrorist attacks since 9/11. The couple willfully destroyed all their hard drives and phones prior to the attack, except for Farook's work phone, which he left in a relative's car.

On Feb. 16, 2016, a federal Judge in California issued an order demanding that Apple assist the FBI in the accessing data on that phone, an iPhone 5C running iOS 9. Specifically, the FBI wants Apple to disable built-in protections that lock up or erase the phone when an incorrect passcode is input too many times. With that functionality disabled, the FBI can enter every possible passcode into the phone until it unlocks. This method is aptly named "brute force" hacking.

The FBI wants Apple to disable built-in protections that lock up or erase the phone when an incorrect passcode is input too many times

This isn't the first time the government has made such a request. Prior to the release of iOS 8 in September 2014, Apple could and did help law enforcement retrieve data from iPhones, although it successfully resisted governmental attempts that it work to actually "hack" into its own products — until now. This time the government is insisting.

The current case is different because the facts are as good as they are ever going to get. The crime is horrific, performed by a religiously motivated terrorist, the perpetrators were members of a minority group, and the phone itself was owned not by the criminal, but by his employer. The facts, law, and emotional appeal will probably never line up quite so well for a government case again.

Apple has already helped the FBI extensively with this investigation. Apple made its engineers available to law enforcement and provided information it has on its iCloud servers. Only the physical data on the phone itself, with approximately six weeks' of information not backed up on iCloud, is what is at issue here. This work phone, with a few weeks of missing data not backed up on iCloud, is not likely to be the most important digital device associated with the crime, but it does make an excellent battleground for the FBI to push for assistance involving hacking phones generally.

If Apple has helped so much with the investigation previously, why is it resisting this request? Among other reasons, the tool to disable the disk wipe does not exist. Apple would have to build it to help the FBI access the data on the phone. Building such a tool would also fly in the face of public statements Apple and CEO Tim Cook has made about data and user privacy since the release of iOS 8 in 2014.

This isn't about just one phone

From its court filings, the FBI believes the construction of this "backdoor" tool can be done privately, in Apple's own labs, with unique code that will only allow it to work on Farook's phone, and the software will never be used again. This is difficult to believe because we know Apple has received many such requests from law enforcement, including a case pending in New York to help the FBI access the phone of a man accused of drug possession — a far cry from murder and terrorism.

Apple sold more than 200 million iPhones in 2015 alone. The ability to unlock even a fraction of those would be worth millions of dollars to any number of buyers. Even if Apple can avoid the obvious problem of someone involved in the operation stealing the tool, the danger of so-called "legitimate" use is an arguably greater issue.

Apple sold more than 200 million iPhones in 2015 alone. The ability to unlock even a fraction of those would be worth millions

After Apple has complied with this type of order once, they will certainly be forced to do it again and again. Once this bell is rung, it is difficult to believe that world governments, much less the US government will be able to resist the temptation ring it again and again. Is this order valid, when constitutionally analyzed under privacy law associated with the Fourth and Ninth Amendments? If this court order is enough to force Apple to hack its own product, what stops this from happening in Russia, China, or Turkey? What of even less popular governments like Iran, Syria or North Korea? It will be difficult for Apple to pick and choose which countries have sufficient freedom and sovereignty for it to obey valid court orders with millions of customers and billions of dollars at stake in certain countries.

What makes meaningful disagreement with the court order so difficult is that the pro-surveillance side has such a powerful argument legally and factually. The FBI has a valid warrant, supported by probable cause. Farook is unquestionably guilty of despicable crimes and may have information on his phone that can lead investigators to other people that helped him commit those crimes. The data may even help prevent future crimes. If the court was asking to search a house, email, or car, this is more than sufficient. Normally, this should be unquestionably enforced. But enforcement here raises many important and far-reaching questions.

Inching toward the slippery slope

The core privacy issue is this: What should the law require? Is this judicial order enough to force Apple to provide access to an encrypted phone? Putting aside North Korea, Russia, or even early 20th-century Germany, we do not have to look outside of our borders to see that governmental and judicial validation is not always enough in the final moral analysis. Abuses of power are a frequent consequence of real or perceived threats to domestic and national security.

The historical evidence is clear: When faced with a threat that qualifies as "special circumstances," our government abuses power

Just last year, the European Court of Justice invalidated the EU-US Safe Harbor framework for personal data transfer because of privacy and surveillance abuses. We know the NSA was and likely still is monitoring email traffic, among other forms of communication, via its PRISM surveillance program, which Google and other Internet companies cooperated with. We know the U.S. has tortured and imprisoned people without trial in Guantanamo Bay. In the 1950's McCarthy, Hoover, and the FBI imprisoned hundreds and had more than ten thousand others fired from their jobs after uncovering potential Communist connections. This month, 74 years ago in 1942, Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 leading to the imprisonment of hundreds of thousands of Japanese in concentration camps, including American citizens and the wives of U.S. servicemen.

The historical evidence is clear: When faced with a threat that qualifies as "special circumstances," our government abuses power, and privacy and liberty are the first things to go. We have seen time and again that, after a certain point, the government may not be trusted with unchecked power. It fails to provide proper constitutional limitations, and those failures are only evident years later. We have seen the government strain to justify abuses or keep the abuses secret. When secret abuses are discovered, they will deny those abuses until the stream of facts make denial impossible.

Why the stakes are so high this time

Beyond governmental overrreach, we should also consider the smartphone is a special, if not unique object in our history. It is not the simplistic "persons, houses, papers, and effects" that was to be protected from unreasonable search and seizure contemplated by the Fourth Amendment.

A single device, weighing just a few ounces, carries thousands of photos attached to location information, voice and video call information, text messages, email, music, countless software application possibilities, geolocation data, and a constant, always-on network connection... to literally all human information. Such a "magical" device would have been inconceivable to the Founding Fathers. Given the balance of harm granting unfettered access to this, it may well be worth considering for protection even beyond the Fourth Amendment.

Beyond the complexity of properly pondering the smartphone technological miracle, there are two genuinely difficult elements to this problem. First, people are going to die. This is not an idle philosophical consideration, marketing event or political problem. If Apple successfully resists the hacking mandate, the phone becomes an even safer place than before to plot crimes, including terrorist attacks. Evildoers around the world will confidently use this powerful device to make carrying out their nefarious plans easier.

Reasonable people could side with either the government or Apple. However, we cannot ignore the problem, deny its importance, or pretend there is a middle ground

Second, if Apple assists in hacking the phone, it won't be the last time they are asked to do it. Some government, somewhere in the world, will abuse this power — and our own government isn't above the temptation.

Given the data a smartphone holds, this will lead to a level of global surveillance beyond anything known in human history. The seminal science-fiction writer Phillip K. Dick described what such a society would look like in his novel Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said: "You will be electronically monitored wherever you go. You will never be alone except for your own thoughtsin your own mind and perhaps not even there."

Reasonable people could side with either the government or Apple on this issue, and there are good reasons to take either position. However, we cannot ignore the problem, deny its importance, or pretend there is a middle ground. At the end of the day, the government will either force Apple — and by extension any and all other phone manufacturers — to help hack the smartphone, or they won't.

Personally, I hope the government is unsuccessful it in its bid to force Apple to aid in hacking the iPhone even with the negative consequences that follow from that decision. If we have learned anything from Snowden, Assange and Guantanamo, the innocent as well as the guilty will be subjected to the consequences of this decision – and some of them won't live through it.

PRISM, McCarthyism, and Japanese internment camps were the results of governmental unfettered access to much less sophisticated technology. The power and potential for abuse are genuinely, without hyperbole, incalculable. Having nothing to hide is a luxury that very few people, even good people, can afford, and having nowhere to hide is the definition of a police state.

A finding in favor of Apple would certainly be inconvenient for law enforcement. But as Jefferson once said, "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it."

Originally published by the New York Legal Ethics Reporter

Please add at the end of every article:

www.fkks.com

This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
S. Gregory Boyd
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.