United States: United States Supreme Court Limits Exception To Immunity For Government-Owned Entities

The United States Supreme Court recently issued a decision in OBB Personeverkehr AG v. Sachs, 136 S. Ct. 390 (Dec. 1, 2015) which significantly limited the basis upon which a commercial entity owned by a foreign government can be sued in the United States under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. (the "FSIA"). This decision may significantly impact certain suits brought in the US against state-owned air carriers.

Background on the FSIA

The FSIA applies in both state and federal courts in all litigation against foreign states and governments, including their "agencies and instrumentalities." The basis for the court's jurisdiction to hear cases against those entities is found in the FSIA, which also provides in those cases rules for service and damages available and extinguishes the right to a jury trial.

The purpose of the FSIA is set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1602, which provides:

The Congress finds that the determination by United States courts of the claims of foreign states to immunity from the jurisdiction of such courts would serve the interests of justice and would protect the rights of both foreign states and litigants in United States courts. Under international law, states are not immune from the jurisdiction of foreign courts insofar as their commercial activities are concerned, and their commercial property may be levied upon for the satisfaction of judgments rendered against them in connection with their commercial activities. Claims of foreign states to immunity should henceforth be decided by courts of the United States and of the States in conformity with the principles set forth in this chapter.

The term "foreign state" is defined in the FSIA to include (1) a political subdivision of a foreign state or (2) an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state (28 U.S.C. § 1603). Foreign-owned airlines are "instrumentalities of a foreign state" to the extent that "a majority of [the airline's] shares or other ownership interest is owned by a foreign state or political subdivision thereof." (28 U.S.C. § 1603). However, if the airline is not owned directly by the foreign government, but rather is owned by a holding company that is owned by the foreign government, the airline will be deemed to have a "tiered" ownership structure and will not be immune from suit under the FSIA.

"Tiering" occurs when a foreign sovereign owns a majority interest in a holding company or other intermediary entity, which in turn owns a majority interest in the entity claiming sovereign immunity. In Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson, 538 U.S. 468 (2003), the Supreme Court resolved a split in the lower courts and held that entities which are indirectly owned by a sovereign government are not agencies or instrumentalities of that government.

As a general matter, pursuant to the FSIA, instrumentalities are immune from suit unless one of the statute's specific exceptions to that immunity applies. If none of the exceptions apply, the instrumentality is immune from suit and the action must be dismissed. If an exception does apply and the instrumentality may be sued in the US, the FSIA governs the handling of the proceedings.

Foreign air carriers are required to waive sovereign immunity in certain contexts in order to receive authority to fly to and from the US. Where the waiver has not been triggered, an exception to FSIA-immunity that frequently applies to foreign-owned airlines relates to the "commercial activity" of the airline, which is defined as "either a regular course of commercial conduct or a particular commercial transaction or act." (28 U.S.C. § 1603(d)).

The "commercial activity" exception in 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(2) provides that:

A foreign state is not immune if the action brought against that state is based upon [emphasis added]:

(2) ... a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state; or upon an act performed in the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere; or upon an act outside the territory of the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere and that act causes a direct effect in the United States;

The US Supreme Court addressed the "commercial activity" exception in OBB Personeverkehr AG v. Sachs.

OBB Personeverkehr AG v. Sachs

Petitioner OBB Personenverkehr AG ("OBB") operated a railway that carries nearly 235 million passengers each year within Austria and to and from points throughout Europe. OBB was wholly-owned by the government of Austria. OBB—along with 29 other railways throughout Europe— was a member of the Eurail Group, which was responsible for the marketing and management of the Eurail pass program. Eurail pass holders are entitled to unlimited passage throughout the network. Passengers were able to purchase passes directly from the Eurail Group and indirectly through travel agents around the world.

Respondent Carol Sachs, a resident of Berkeley, California, purchased a Eurail pass over the Internet from The Rail Pass Experts, a Massachusetts-based travel agent. The following month, Sachs arrived at a train station in Innsbruck, Austria, where she intended to use her Eurail pass to ride an OBB train to Prague. As she attempted to board the train, Respondent fell from the platform onto the tracks. Her legs were crushed by OBB's moving train resulting in the amputation of both of her legs.

Respondent sued OBB in federal court asserting five causes of action: (1) negligence; (2) strict liability for design defects in the train and platform; (3) strict liability for failure to warn of those design defects; (4) breach of an implied warranty of merchantability for providing a train and platform unsafe for their intended uses; and (5) breach of an implied warranty of fitness for providing a train and platform unfit for their intended uses. OBB claimed sovereign immunity under the FSIA. The parties agreed OBB was a "foreign state", but disputed the application of the "commercial activity" exception. Specifically, OBB argued that the commercial activity exception to immunity did not apply because the suit was not "based upon" the sale of the rail pass for purposes of the 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(2).

In order to determine whether the action is "based upon" the commercial activity of the foreign state/ instrumentality, a court must first "identify[ ] the particular conduct on which the [plaintiff's] action is 'based.'" (OBB, at 394, quoting, Saudi Arabia v. Nelson, 507 U.S. 349, 356, 113 S.Ct. 1471, 1471, 123 L.Ed.2d 47 (1993)). The Nelson Court instructed that courts should look at those elements, which, if proven, would entitle a plaintiff to relief when determining what a particular claim is "based upon."

The Ninth Circuit adopted a "one-element" test, which would require courts to look at each of the elements of all of the causes of action asserted to determine if the commercial activity made up any one element of the claim. The Ninth Circuit held that if it did, the action was "based upon" that activity.

The Supreme Court rejected this approach, holding that an action is "based upon" the "particular conduct" that constitutes the "gravamen" of the suit. Courts must "zero in on the core" of the suit to determine upon what the suit is based.

Under this analysis, the conduct constituting the gravamen of Respondent's suit plainly occurred outside the US. In fact, "all of her claims turn on the same tragic episode in Austria, allegedly caused by wrongful conduct and dangerous conditions in Austria, which led to injuries suffered in Austria." Respondent argued that her claims were not limited to negligent conduct or unsafe conditions in Austria, but rather involved at least some wrongful action in the United States, specifically, that OBB should have alerted her to the dangerous conditions at the Innsbruck train station when it sold the Eurail pass to her in the United States.

The Court rejected Respondent's attempt to sidestep the FSIA's application through artful pleading. The Court held that "[h]owever Sachs frames her suit, the incident in Innsbruck remains at its foundation." Therefore, the commercial activity exception did not apply and OBB was immune from suit.

Conclusion and implications for airlines

Under the Supreme Court's holding in OBB, foreign government-owned airlines may be immune from suit in the US for their activities occurring outside the US that do not involve flights to or from the US particularly where the conduct central to the plaintiff's claims occurs outside the US.

United States Supreme Court Limits Exception To Immunity For Government-Owned Entities

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions