United States: Legal Challenges To U.S. EPA's Clean Power Plan Continue In The D.C. Circuit And U.S. Supreme Court

Last Updated: February 26 2016
Article by Daniel P. Hido

The legal battle over the Clean Power Plan ("CPP") continues to take shape, with many new developments occurring in the final months of 2015 and the first few weeks of 2016. When the U.S. EPA announced the final rule on August 3, 2015, it was immediately met by legal challenges from states and industry. However, as previously reported in The Climate Report, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia dismissed these challenges as premature, because the final rule had not yet been published in the Federal Register.

The CPP was finally published on October 23, 2015. See 80 Fed. Reg. 64966. Upon publication, dozens of states and industry groups again challenged the rule in the D.C. Circuit. See West Virginia v. EPA, No. 15-1363. At bottom, petitioners claim that EPA lacks authority under the Clean Air Act ("CAA") to issue the CPP. Before reaching the merits of that claim, however, the D.C. Circuit first addressed several procedural motions. One of those motions worked its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, leading to a dramatic result.

Petitioners Seek Stay of the Rule. Petitioners asked the D.C. Circuit to stay the CPP pending judicial review. Petitioners asserted that a stay was necessary because states, businesses, and local communities must immediately take steps to meet deadlines imposed by the CPP, including submission of a State Implementation Plan ("SIP") by September 2016.

Petitioners further contended that businesses and local communities would be irreparably harmed if the rule was not stayed. For example, according to petitioners, because the CPP focuses on moving from coal-fired to natural-gas-fired power plants, existing coal-fired plants, as well as associated businesses such as mines, railways, and equipment manufacturers, would be forced to shut down. Petitioners also claimed that the CPP would harm the reliability of electric grids and cause electricity prices to rise, thereby irreparably harming the general public. Lastly, petitioners asserted that they were likely to prevail on the merits because EPA lacked the legal authority to issue the rule.

EPA responded that the rule is legal and that petitioners would not suffer any irreparable harm if the rule remains in place pending judicial review. EPA noted that states have up to three years to submit their final SIPs if they receive an extension, and that the rule does not require any changes to be made until 2022, with additional phasing-in through 2030. EPA also disputed petitioners' assertions of irreparable harm in the energy industry, claiming that the rule simply builds upon preexisting industry trends.

In reply, petitioners countered that the far-off deadlines and phasing-in nature of the rule means that EPA cannot demonstrate any public harm if the rule is stayed.

On January 21, 2016, the D.C. Circuit denied petitioners' motions to stay the CPP, holding that petitioners failed to satisfy "the stringent requirements for a stay pending court review." Undeterred, on January 26, 2016, petitioners asked the Supreme Court to stay the CPP, reiterating in their application to the Supreme Court that a stay is necessary to prevent irreparable harm to states and industry while the CPP is being litigated, and further emphasizing that EPA lacks CAA authority to issue the rule. EPA, again, countered that the agency has the authority to issue the rule and that petitioners would not suffer irreparable harm, especially because the D.C. Circuit has now agreed to expedite its hearing of the underlying case.

On February 9, 2016, the Supreme Court voted 5–4 to stay the CPP. The one-page Order does not provide the reasoning for the Court's decision. The Order also stays the rule pending disposition of petitions for review in the Supreme Court, if sought. The Supreme Court's ruling may prefigure how it will rule on the merits if the case does end up in the Court, which now seems likely.

Challengers Seek Expedited Judicial Review and Bifurcated Briefing. In addition to seeking a stay, petitioners have asked the D.C. Circuit to expedite the briefing schedule and hold oral arguments on their challenges in the spring of 2016. Just as they argued in support of a stay, petitioners contended that expedited review was necessary because the CPP's deadlines require states and industry to take immediate measures to begin implementing the rule, which will cause irreparable harm.

Petitioners also asked the D.C. Circuit to create two separate briefing schedules: one related to EPA's legal authority to issue the rule and a second on state and implementation-related programmatic issues. Petitioners argued that these issues are so complex that they warrant separate briefing.

In opposing bifurcation, EPA disputed that the issues involved are so complex as to require bifurcated briefing and also argued that petitioners had failed to articulate a sound basis for separating the issues. EPA further asserted that bifurcated briefing would ultimately delay resolution of the issues by creating potentially duplicative rounds of briefing and oral argument. Lastly, EPA argued that the bifurcation and scheduling motions ignored the fact that the D.C. Circuit had yet to rule on petitioners' motions to stay the rule pending appeal. EPA contended that the court's decision on a stay would have an impact on the merits briefing of the case, and therefore the motions for expedited review and bifurcated briefing were premature.

On January 21, 2016, the D.C. Circuit granted petitioners' motion for expedited judicial review. Regarding the bifurcated briefing issue, the court ordered the parties to submit a proposed briefing format, reminding the parties that "the court looks with extreme disfavor on repetitious submissions." Oral argument on the challenges to the CPP will be held on June 2, 2016.

States and Cities Join EPA in Defense of the CPP. Although publication of the CPP triggered a wave of challenges from states and industry, a coalition of 18 states, six cities, and one county, led by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, intervened in the consolidated challenges for the purpose of defending the rule. Attorney General Schneiderman pointed to the fact that New York had reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent between 2005 and 2014 as evidence that the CPP's requirement that existing plants reduce emissions by 32 percent by 2030 is feasible.

In support of intervention, the coalition cited the negative effects that climate change has on industry and their citizens. Iowa, for example, asserted that climate change negatively affects the state's agricultural industry. Virginia, for its part, pointed to rising sea levels that threaten the Hampton Roads metropolitan area, as well as Naval Station Norfolk, the largest naval base in the world, and other military bases in the state.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.