United States: EU-US Agreement On Regulation Of Central Counterparties

On 10 February 2016, the European Commission and the CFTC announced a common approach regarding supervision of central counterparties operating in the US and EU, paving the way for cross-border equivalence and recognition decisions. The agreement promises to resolve a major and long-standing impasse which has threatened to paralyse the financial markets.

EU-US Agreement on CCPs

On 10 February 2016, the European Commissioner for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced a common approach regarding recognition of their respective regulatory frameworks for clearing central counterparties (CCPs).1

Following this agreement, the European Commission intends to adopt an equivalence decision to declare that the CFTC requirements for derivatives clearing organisations (DCOs) under the agency's jurisdiction are equivalent to requirements under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR).2 This will allow such US CCPs3 to be recognised under EMIR and to continue to provide services in the EU whilst complying with CFTC requirements, although they will need to comply with certain additional requirements under EU rules as discussed below. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has also announced that whilst it has 180 days to recognise CCPs under EMIR, it will do everything within its powers to shorten that period, given the 21 June 2016 deadline for the start of the clearing obligation.

CFTC staff will propose a determination of comparability with respect to EU requirements, which will permit EU CCPs that are registered or intend to register with the CFTC as DCOs to provide services to US clearing members and clients whilst complying with corresponding EU requirements in lieu of CFTC requirements. CFTC staff will also propose streamlining the registration process for an EU CCP wishing to register as a DCO.

Equivalence under EMIR

Under EMIR, the European Commission may adopt equivalence decisions declaring that:

  • the legal and supervisory arrangements of a third country ensure that CCPs authorised in a third country comply with legally binding requirements equivalent to requirements in EMIR;
  • those third country CCPs are subject to effective supervision and enforcement in that third country on an ongoing basis; and
  • the legal framework of that third country provides for an effective equivalent system for the recognition of CCPs authorised under third country legal regimes.

Such decisions are necessary for CCPs established in third countries to provide services in the EU. To date, the European Commission has adopted equivalence decisions for the regulatory regimes for CCPs in Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, Canada, Mexico, South Africa, Switzerland and the Republic of Korea.4

Key Differences between the US and EU Regulatory Regimes

In September 2013, ESMA published its final technical advice on the US's regulatory equivalence to EMIR. The technical advice highlighted various differences between the US and EU regulatory regimes, resulting in a delay in the European Commission adopting an equivalence decision for the US. This delay has, in turn, contributed to the delayed application of capital requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)5 in the context of EU banking groups' exposures to CCPs, as absent an equivalence decision, European clearing members would need to hold more regulatory capital to clear on US CCPs than if recognition were granted to US CCPs.

The announcement that an equivalence decision from the European Commission is forthcoming is prefaced on the proposed resolution of a number of differences between the US and EU regulatory regimes which are of economic importance. In the absence of harmonisation, it has been feared that a flight of derivatives markets away from the EU may have occurred due to lower collateral requirements and therefore reduced costs of clearing transactions in the US. We discuss below the main differences between the EU and US regimes and resolutions that facilitate an equivalence decision under the new agreement:

Minimum Liquidation Periods

A liquidation period is the time period used for the calculation of the collateral that the CCP estimates is necessary to manage its exposure to a defaulting member. Essentially, a CCP examines the maximum predicted possible price movement over the liquidation period to calculate a baseline figure for initial margin. Under EMIR, the liquidation period applicable to exchange-traded futures contracts must be at least two business days. For customer positions, clearing members may post margin on a net basis (Two Day Net).

Under the US regime, the minimum liquidation period for exchange-traded futures contracts must be at least one day.6 For customer positions, clearing members must post margin on a gross basis (One Day Gross).

In December 2015, ESMA published a Consultation Paper7 proposing to amend the liquidation period provisions for customer accounts with the aim of addressing the difference between Two Day Net and One Day Gross. The proposal permits One Day Gross in the EU if certain conditions are met, including that the identity of the client is known to the CCP, the client is not an affiliate of a clearing member and the CCP implements procedures to: (i) calculate for each account, initial and variation margin requirements at least every hour during the day; and (ii) collect margins within one hour where the new margin requirement meets certain thresholds.

Whilst this new flexibility has been widely welcomed, the proposed conditions for One Day Gross are controversial. ESMA's proposals are intended to facilitate equivalence between the US and EU regimes but the conditions imposed by ESMA for One Day Gross have raised significant concerns in the market, including that such conditions are not required under the US regime or could lead to other undesired consequences and further non-equivalence. For example, it is a significant deviation from all other EU financial legislation to treat affiliates differently. It would be strange to exclude such positions when affiliates are often themselves acting as intermediaries for other clients. It is also to be hoped that ESMA will clarify that their "known to the CCP" condition is not intended to mandate so-called "leapfrog payments" by CCPs to clients, a structure proposed in EMIR which ESMA itself has acknowledged is unworkable in many situations.

The common approach contemplates that US CCPs seeking recognition in the EU will have to provide in their rules for two day margin on clearing members' proprietary accounts as a condition of equivalence. The common approach does not specifically address customer accounts, presumably pending the conclusion of the consultation on customer account margin.

Countercyclical Buffer

EMIR requires a CCP to establish transparent and predictable procedures for adjusting margin requirements in response to changing market conditions. In doing so, CCPs are required to employ at least one of a number of options including applying a margin buffer at least equivalent to 25% of the calculated margins which it allows to be temporarily exhausted in periods where calculated margin requirements are rising significantly. By contrast, the US regime does not contain such a specific or numerical procyclicality buffer. The common approach announcement states that US CCPs seeking recognition will need to have internal margin models that include measures to mitigate the risks of procyclicality, although the specific terms of this requirement remain to be seen.

"Cover 2" Default Requirements

Under EMIR, CCPs are required to maintain default resources sufficient to cover a default by the two largest clearing members (Cover 2). Certain US CCPs are only required to maintain default resources sufficient to cover a default by the largest clearing member. The common approach announcement states that US CCPs seeking recognition in the EU will need to maintain Cover 2 default resources. However, because US CCPs that have been determined to be systemically important and those that have elected to be subject to additional standards (so-called "subpart C DCOs") are currently required to satisfy Cover 2 under CFTC rules, this condition is unlikely to have a significant effect on most DCOs seeking recognition.

Exception for Agricultural Derivatives

The common approach announcement provides that these additional conditions will not apply to US agricultural commodity derivatives traded and cleared domestically within the US, in light of the nexus of these contracts with the US economy, the importance of the contracts to US agricultural providers and the low degree of systemic interconnectedness of agricultural products with the rest of the financial system.

CFTC Actions under the Common Approach

The common approach contemplates that the CFTC will implement a substituted compliance regime for DCOs to facilitate the ability of EU CCPs to satisfy "a majority of" DCO requirements through compliance with EU supervisory standards, although it is not clear at this stage which DCO requirements will fall into this category. The common approach does not appear to change the CFTC's position that EU CCPs will still need to register as a DCO in order to provide clearing services in the US or to US clearing members and clients, but would reduce the compliance burdens of such registration by allowing such DCOs to comply with EU requirements instead of CFTC requirements. The CFTC has also stated it will streamline the registration process for EU CCPs seeking DCO registration.

How precisely the CFTC will implement the common approach has not yet been specified. In particular, it seems likely that the CFTC must prepare and propose a determination of comparability concluding that the EU requirements for CCPs are comparable to most of the regulatory framework for DCOs, and in the process identify any requirements that are not comparable. With respect to streamlining the DCO registration process for EU CCP registrants, it is unclear whether the CFTC would proceed by amendments to its rules or through an exemptive order or no-action relief. In any such actions, the CFTC will likely need to consider and address any concerns that the relief to be extended to EU CCPs could threaten the competitiveness of, or otherwise adversely affect the position of, US CCPs. In any case, the common approach contemplates that such actions will be undertaken within the same timeframe in which the European Commission is expected to adopt an equivalence decision for US CCPs and complete the process for their recognition under EMIR.


1 The announcement is available here.

2 Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories.

3 The common approach does not address the equivalence of the US requirements applicable to securities clearing agencies that are registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The statement notes that the European Commission continues to discuss with the SEC an approach that may lead to a similar EU equivalence decision for such clearing agencies. The announcement does not explicitly address how the common approach will apply to US CCPs that are both registered DCOs and securities clearing agencies (and such matters may therefore need to be addressed in the details of implementation), although such entities must at a minimum comply with the CFTC rules and, accordingly, one would expect that the common approach would apply at least with respect to activities within the scope of such CFTC rules that are to be deemed equivalent.

4 You may like to view our client note "Update on Third Country Equivalence under EMIR" dated 18 November 2015, available here. Equivalence decisions are available here.

5 Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investments firms.

6 For cleared swaps on a financial underlying asset, both the US and EU require a minimum five-day liquidation period for the margin calculation.

7 The consultation paper is available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Barnabas W.B. Reynolds
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Shearman & Sterling LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions