United States: Federal Circuit Patent Updates - February 2016

Last Updated: February 18 2016
Article by WilmerHale

Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc. (No. 2014-1617, 2/12/16) (en banc)

February 12, 2016 4:11 PM

Taranto, J. En banc decision reaffirming holdings of earlier CAFC decisions regarding patent exhaustion in light of recent Supreme Court cases: 1) "a patentee,  when  selling  a  patented  article  subject  to  a single-use/no-resale restriction that is lawful and clearly communicated to the purchaser, does not by that sale give the buyer, or downstream buyers, the resale/reuse authority that has been expressly denied;" and 2) "a U.S. patentee, merely by selling or authorizing the sale of a U.S.-patented article abroad, does not authorize the buyer to import the article and sell and use it in the United States." "A buyer may still rely on a foreign sale as a defense to infringement,  but  only  by  establishing  an express  or implied  license—a defense separate from exhaustion, as Quanta  holds—based  on  patentee  communications  or other circumstances of the sale." Dyk and Hughes, JJ., dissent.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG (No. 2014-1719, 2/11/16) (Chen, Mayer, Stoll)

February 11, 2016 3:49 PM

Chen, J. Affirming in part, vacating in part, and remanding PTAB denial of a motion to amend in an IPR proceeding. "Under the particular circumstances presented here ..., we conclude that the Board should have explicitly  acknowledged and evaluated Nike's secondary considerations evidence." However, "[r]ecognizing that the Board operates under stringent time constraints, we do not hold that it is obliged to  explicitly address conclusory and unsupported arguments raised by a litigant." "[D]espite correctly reciting the Idle Free standard that multiple substitute claims are permissible  if  they  are  patentably  distinct  from  each other, the Board nevertheless did not engage in any such analysis comparing proposed substitute claims 48 and 49." A "portion of the Board's analysis on whether Nike's proposal of claim 48 and 49 constituted a reasonable number of substitute claims for originally issued claim 19 lacks critical fact-findings needed for any obviousness determination."  A statement of the patent owner "simply stating that its proposed claims were patentable over prior art known to [patent owner], but not part of the record of the proceedings" was adequate to satisfy the patent owner's burden under 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(c) "absent  an  allegation  of  conduct  violating  the  duty  of candor."

WilmerHale represented appellant Nike on appeal.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.  

Transweb, LLC v. 3M Innovative Properties (No. 2014-1646, 2/10/16) (Wallach, Bryson, Hughes)

February 10, 2016 5:22 PM

Hughes, J.  Affirming judgment of invalidity in light of a prior public use, inequitable conduct, Walker Process antitrust violation, and an award of trebled attorney fees as antitrust damages. Regarding the necessary corroboration of oral testimony of a prior public use,  "[w]e treat the ultimate determination of whether such oral testimony is sufficiently corroborated as a question of fact,  which we review for clear error." "[T]here are no hard and fast rules as to what constitutes sufficient corroboration, and each case must be decided on its own facts." Attorney fees for defending the infringement suit "appropriately flow[ed] from the unlawful aspect of ... [the] antitrust violation and thus are an antitrust injury that can properly serve as the basis for antitrust damages."

WilmerHale represented appellant 3M on appeal.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Synopsys, Inc. v. Lee (No. 2015-1275, 2015-1183, 2/10/16) (Newman, Dyk, Wallach)

February 10, 2016 3:18 PM

Dyk, J. Dismissing as moot appeal of an Administrative Procedure Act suit challenging PTAB practice of issuing final decisions on fewer than all  of the claims raised in a petition for IPR, in light of the Synopsys v. Mentor case above. "Where a party challenges agency action alternatively in two separate suits, and a decision in one case resolves the issues presented in the companion case, the companion case becomes moot." Newman, J., dissents.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation (No. 2014-1516, 2/10/16) (Newman, Dyk, Wallach)

February 10, 2016 1:55 PM

Dyk, J. Affirming PTAB decisions in an IPR that claims were not invalid and denying a motion to amend, and holding that the  Board  need  not  address  every  claim  raised  in  the petition for review in its final decision. "[W]e find no statutory requirement that the Board's final decision address every claim raised in a petition for inter partes review. Section 318(a) only requires the Board to address claims as to which review was granted." Newman, J., dissents.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corp. (No. 2014-1732, 2/10/16) (Dyk, Taranto, Hughes

February 10, 2016 10:17 AM

Hughes, J. Affirming in part, vacating in part, reversing in part, and remanding summary judgment of noninfringement. The district court erred by importing limitations into certain claim steps and in granting summary judgment based on intervening rights. In determining whether intervening rights apply following reexamination, "amendments made during reexamination do not necessarily compel a conclusion that the scope of the claims has been substantively changed. ...   This is true even where the claims at issue were amended during reexamination after a rejection based on prior art."

A full version of the text available in PDF form.

Rosebuds LMS Inc. v. Adobe Systems Incorporated (No. 2015-1428, 2/9/16) (Moore, Hughes, Stoll)

February 9, 2016 4:50 PM

Moore, J. Affirming summary judgment of no liability for pre-issuance  damages under 35  U.S.C. § 154(d) because the defendant  had no actual notice of the published patent application that led to the asserted patent. "Constructive knowledge would not satisfy the actual notice requirement. ...[H]owever,  § 154(d)'s requirement of actual notice [does not] require[] an affirmative act by the applicant giving notice of the published patent application to the infringer." "[T]he ordinary meaning of "actual notice" also includes knowledge obtained without an affirmative act of notification." "Nor does our construction of 35 U.S.C. § 287(a) apply to § 154(d). ... Section 287(a) explicitly requires an act of notification, unlike § 154(d), which merely requires 'actual notice'." "Knowledge of related patents ... is ... legally  insufficient to establish actual notice of the published patent application."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Trivascular, Inc. v. Samuels (No. 2015-1631, 2/5/16) (Moore, O'Malley, Wallach)

February 5, 2016 4:13 PM

O'Malley, J. Affirming PTAB decision in an inter partes review (IPR) that the petitioner failed to prove the challenged claims obvious. "[T]he Board  is  not  bound  by  any findings made in its Institution Decision. At that point, the Board is considering the matter preliminarily without the benefit of a full record. The Board is free to change its view of the merits after further development of the record, and should do so if convinced its initial inclinations were wrong." "[T]here is a significant difference between a petitioner's burden to establish a 'reasonable  likelihood  of  success'  at  institution,  and  actually proving invalidity by a preponderance of the evidence at trial."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Trireme Medical, LLc v. Angioscore, Inc. (No. 2015-1504, 2/5/16) (Prost, Dyk, Chen)

February 5, 2016 10:44 AM

Dyk, J. Reversing dismissal of suit for correction of inventorship for lack of standing and remanding. "When the owner of a patent assigns away all rights to  the patent, neither he nor his later assignee has a 'concrete financial interest in the patent' that would support standing in a correction of inventorship action," but questions of fact as to whether such an assignment occurred here by reason of a Consulting Agreement could not be resolved on a motion to dismiss.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Trustees of Columbia Univ. v. Symantec Corporation (No. 2015-1146, 2/2/16) (Prost, Dyk, Hughes)

February 2, 2016 3:12 PM

Dyk, J. Affirming in part judgments of noninfringement and invalidity as to certain claims but reversing judgment of noninfringement as to other claims because of an incorrect claim construction. "Our case law does not require explicit redefinition or disavowal" in order to narrow a claim term from its ordinary meaning.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions