United States: Indiana Tax Court Rules Transfer Pricing Studies Should Be Respected When Determining Indiana Income

On December 18, 2015, the Indiana Tax Court granted a taxpayer's motion for summary judgment and held that the Indiana Department of Revenue improperly adjusted the taxpayer's Indiana source income to correct a perceived unfair reflection based on application of Indiana's standard sourcing rules.1 The Court noted that the Department's available remedy was limited to the use of reasonable alternative methods to divide the taxpayer's tax base and that the intercompany transactions between the taxpayer and its parent and affiliate included in the computation were conducted at arm's-length rates. Therefore, the standard sourcing rules fairly reflected the taxpayer's Indiana source income. Further, the Court stated that even if the income had not been fairly reflected under standard sourcing rules, the Department's proposed adjustments to the taxpayer's Indiana source income were unreasonable.


Columbia Sportswear, Inc. (Columbia), the taxpayer at issue in this matter, sells and distributes the sporting/hiking apparel, footwear, and related accessories/equipment of its parent, Columbia Sportswear Company, Inc. (CSC), and its affiliate, Mountain Hardwear, Inc. (Mountain) throughout the United States, including in Indiana. For the years at issue, both CSC and Mountain purchased these products from independent foreign manufacturers and resold them to Columbia. The price which Columbia paid for the products included value derived from CSC and Mountain's research, design, sourcing, manufacturing and advertising activities. As evidence of this value, Columbia provided transfer pricing studies conducted by an independent accounting firm documenting arm's-length pricing for these intercompany sales.

For its 2005, 2006 and 2007 tax years, Columbia filed Indiana adjusted gross income tax (AGIT) returns on a separate company basis. In 2008, Columbia filed amended returns for the 2005 and 2006 tax years requesting a refund of the AGIT that had been paid.2 Subsequently, the Department audited Columbia and adjusted its net income based on its conclusion that intercompany transactions had improperly distorted Columbia's Indiana source income.

On September 24, 2010, the Department issued assessments for the 2005, 2006 and 2007 tax years of $948,369.69 in AGIT, as well as additional penalties and interest. Columbia protested the assessments, and following a hearing, the penalties were waived.

On April 28, 2011, Columbia Sportswear initiated an original tax appeal. Both parties submitted motions for summary judgment with the Indiana Tax Court.3

Department's Authority to Modify Calculation of Indiana Source Income

Indiana taxes the portion of a corporation's adjusted gross income derived from sources within Indiana.4 Each corporation with Indiana adjusted gross income generally reports its tax liability on a separate company basis using statutory apportionment rules.5 Separate filing is the default method, but if the standard apportionment provisions do not fairly represent the taxpayer's income from sources within Indiana, the taxpayer may petition for or the Department may require an alternative apportionment method.6 In the case of organizations, trades or businesses owned by the same interests, the Department has the authority to distribute, apportion or allocate the income derived from sources within Indiana between and among the organizations, trades or businesses to fairly reflect the income derived within Indiana by the various taxpayers.7

Alternative Apportionment

In its assessment, the Department initially relied upon its authority to apply an alternative apportionment method to fairly reflect the taxpayer's Indiana source income.8 Specifically, the Department applied the following steps in its calculation of Columbia's source income adjustment:

Step 1: Determined the average net profit ratio of the federal consolidated group for each of the years at issue by dividing the group's gross receipts by net income;

Step 2: Recalculated Columbia's net income for each of the years at issue by multiplying Columbia's gross receipts by the average net profit ratios determined in Step 1;

Step 3: Ascertained the additional amount of Columbia's net income to be attributed to Indiana for each of the years at issue by subtracting Columbia's federal taxable income as reported on each year's federal pro forma income tax return9 from the applicable amount in Step 2; and

Step 4: Finally, applied Columbia's original apportionment percentage from its Indiana AGIT returns to the amount determined in Step 3.

In considering the Department's approach, the Court noted that the Department did not actually recalculate Columbia's apportionment percentage. Rejecting the Department's assertion that its computation "merely 'allocated' back the sales that Columbia Sportswear improperly sent away from Indiana to ensure that the Department had 'an accurate starting point' for determining Columbia Sportswear's AGIT liability," the Court clarified that the "concepts of allocation and apportionment under Indiana Code Sec. 6-3-2-2(l)(4) involve the division of the tax base among the states, not the computation of the tax base itself." In support of this conclusion, the Court cited similar statutory language included in the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (UDITPA), which deals solely with division of income, rather than determination of the tax base.10 Thus, the Court found that the statute did not grant the Department authority to adjust Columbia's net income tax base, but only to divide its tax base differently, so the requested adjustments were improper.

Distribution of Income Between Related Corporations

The Department alternatively based its assessment upon Indiana law which provides that "in the case of two or more organizations, trades, or businesses owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the same interests, the department shall distribute, apportion, or allocate the income derived from sources within the state of Indiana between and among those organizations, trades or businesses in order to fairly reflect and report the income derived from sources within the state of Indiana by various taxpayers."11 The Court agreed that if the standard sourcing rules do not fairly reflect a taxpayer's Indiana source income, this law authorizes the Department to adjust intercompany expense deductions that reduce a taxpayer's Indiana tax base, such as deductions for the cost of goods sold to an affiliate. However, with the language at issue being similar to language contained in a regulation interpreting Internal Revenue Code Sec. 482,12 the Court found the Indiana provision to serve a similar purpose, to ensure that taxpayers clearly reflect income attributable to controlled transactions and to prevent the avoidance of taxes with respect to such transactions.

The Department relied upon this provision to impose its audit adjustments,13 noting that they were necessary to correct for the impact of sales that had been erroneously sourced outside Indiana and ensure that the taxpayer had an "accurate starting point" to determine its AGIT liability. In response, Columbia produced transfer pricing studies as evidence that its intercompany transactions were conducted at arm's-length rates and, thus, its Indiana source income was fairly reflected under the standard sourcing rules.

Based on the recent Rent-A-Center Tax Court decision,14 the Court dismissed the Department's arguments against reliance on the transfer pricing studies, including that Indiana had not adopted or enacted any legislation similar or related to IRC Sec. 482 and that IRC Sec. 482's purposes are in no way related to the Indiana Code. Also discharged was an assertion by the Department that a disclaimer included in the relevant documents stating that they did not "reach any conclusions regarding state tax issues," rendered the transfer pricing studies irrelevant. Therefore, the Court found that Columbia's intercompany transactions were conducted at arm's-length rates and, since the standard sourcing rules fairly reflected its Indiana source income, the proposed adjustments were invalid.

Finally, even if the Court assumed that Columbia's Indiana source income was distorted under the standard sourcing rules, the Court found the Department's adjustments to Columbia's net income tax base to be unreasonable. Specifically, the Department's adjustments attributed over 99 percent of the gross income of the group to a single entity, Columbia. The Court found this attribution to be out of all appropriate proportion to its Indiana business activities as evidenced by its property, payroll and sales factors, which were accepted by the Department.


This decision illuminates the Tax Court's view of the Department as an administrative agency and its own role in limiting the Department to its legislatively granted power. Interestingly, as an alternative to the proceeding, the Department requested that the Court remand this case so that it could require Columbia to file a combined income tax return as an alternative method to address its finding that application of Indiana's standard sourcing rules did not clearly reflect Columbia's Indiana source income.15 As the Department itself found this approach inapplicable during the audit, the Court declined to grant the request.

This decision provides positive support for taxpayers that rely on transfer pricing studies to properly reflect the impact of intercompany transactions, and is consistent with the recent Rent-A-Center Tax Court decision issued by the same judge. In both cases, the Court found that the Department was incorrect in its requirement that the taxpayer calculate Indiana source income using an alternative method imposed by the Department, rather than the standard approach found in Indiana law. Further, the Court confirmed in both cases that transfer pricing studies that had been conducted to determine intercompany charges were both relevant to the calculation of Indiana source income, and that Indiana income was fairly stated.

The Court has made it very clear with both of these decisions that for the purpose of fairly reflecting the taxpayer's Indiana source income, the Department must recognize transfer pricing studies that have been conducted, even if such studies were not specifically performed to address a taxpayer's state income tax posture. In addition, in both cases, the Department failed to provide evidence that the taxpayer was incorporating tax avoidance practices when filing its Indiana AGIT return. Of course, while the Tax Court has made itself clear on these matters, it remains to be seen if upon potential challenge by the Department, higher-level state courts will stand in agreement.


1 Columbia Sportswear USA Corp. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue, Indiana Tax Court, No. 49T10- 1104-TA-00032, Dec. 18, 2015.

2 The facts of this case did not include the reason for amending the returns.

3 The Tax Court hearing took place on July 31, 2013.

4 IND. CODE § 6-3-2-1(b).

5 IND. CODE § 6-3-2-2(a)-(k).

6 IND. CODE § 6-3-2-2(l).

7 IND. CODE § 6-3-2-2(m). As discussed below, this provision is similar to IRC § 482.

8 IND. CODE § 6-3-2-2(l)(4).

9 For the tax years at issue, Columbia, CSC and Mountain filed federal consolidated income tax returns. For state tax reporting purposes, each entity prepared a federal pro forma income tax return to compute income and losses on a separate company basis.

10 UDITPA § 18(4) provides "[i]f the allocation and apportionment provisions of this Act do not fairly represent the extent of the taxpayer's business activity in this state, the taxpayer may petition for or the [tax administrator] may require, in respect to all or any part of the taxpayer's business activity, if reasonable, the employment of any other method to effectuate an equitable allocation and apportionment of the taxpayer's income." Although Indiana has not formally adopted UDITPA, its allocation and apportionment provisions generally mirror the UDITPA provisions.

11 IND. CODE § 6-3-2-2(m).

12 Treas. Reg. § 1.482-1(a) (1).

13 Note that the audit adjustments increased Columbia's pre-apportionment income by approximately $100 million for each year at issue.

14 Rent-A-Center East, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue, Indiana Tax Court, No. 49T10-0612- TA-0106, Sept. 10, 2015. For a discussion of this case, see GT SALT Alert: Indiana Tax Court Holds Taxpayer Not Required to File Combined Return.

15 IND. CODE § 6-3-2-2(p).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.