United States: Global Anti-Bribery Year-In-Review: 2015 Developments And Predictions For 2016

Among other significant developments, 2015 saw the U.S. Department of Justice (the "DOJ" or the "Department") document a policy priority of holding individuals accountable for corporate wrongdoing. This policy was laid out in the "Yates Memorandum"—announced by Deputy Assistant Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates—and related changes the DOJ made to the U.S. Attorney's Manual. The most significant aspect of the Yates Memorandum is the requirement that corporations turn over "all relevant facts relating to the individuals responsible for the misconduct" in order to be eligible for any cooperation credit. This requirement creates questions about how the DOJ will deal with aspects of attorney-client privilege law and foreign blocking statutes that intersect with the "all relevant facts" requirement.

The commitment to pursuing more cases against individuals appears to be strong, and the DOJ does appear to be passing on some corporate cases where it once might have insisted on a resolution. Going by the statistics, the Yates Memorandum's policy was reflected in the number of cases brought during the year, although the policy was not announced until September. Last year the DOJ resolved with or charged eight individuals in FCPA-related cases, as compared to only two individuals in 2014. Meanwhile, its tempo with respect to corporations decreased. It resolved such cases against only two corporations (or groups of corporations), down from seven in 2014. The penalty amounts were lower, with no corporate penalty cracking the "top ten" of FCPA resolutions in dollar amount, and none coming close to the record $772 million that Alstom paid at the very end of 2014. Another possible consequence of the new policy emphasis is that both of last year's DOJ corporate resolutions were "package" resolutions—the DOJ announced guilty pleas with individuals on the same day the DOJ announced an agreement with the company related to the same conduct.

However, it can be dangerous to extrapolate too much about the government's enforcement agenda based on a single year. While the DOJ last year brought more actions against individuals than in 2014, its 2015 total of eight was less than its 2013 total of sixteen.

This year could easily see the DOJ announce significantly more than two FCPA actions with respect to corporations; there are many corporate cases publicly reported to be in the pipeline, and the Department has dedicated significantly increased resources to anti-corruption enforcement. It announced in 2015 that it is hiring ten additional FCPA prosecutors and is also adding at least a dozen FBI agents solely focused on FCPA cases. In early 2016, a senior DOJ official suggested that the number of cases may look very different after just a few months.

Even if the DOJ's emphasis on individuals might mean that the mix of cases will continue to skew away from those that result in a resolution with the company, compliance and investigations will continue to be important priorities for global corporations. Even a case that is only likely to result in a resolution with, or charge against, individuals creates work and headaches for corporate counsel, as well costs of cooperating with the investigation and reputational damage to the company if its employees are charged with wrongdoing. Moreover, whether or not the company is charged is a decision that likely will continue to be made by the DOJ at the end of an investigation, after considerable time and resources have been expended.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (the "SEC" or the "Commission") headline numbers, on the other hand, were more consistent with its previous pattern. It resolved with nine corporations and charged or resolved with two individuals. As in prior years, most of the SEC's FCPA resolutions with corporations were based on violations of the FCPA's books-and-records and internal-controls provisions, with only three of the corporate cases including violations of the anti-bribery provisions. For the first time since 2001, none of the corporations that executed a resolution with the SEC simultaneously executed one with the DOJ. Again, this likely reflects the DOJ's shift in emphasis—the DOJ does appear to be passing on cases against corporations that in prior years it might well have treated more aggressively. Notably, China continued to be a country with a concentration of corruption cases—three of the SEC's resolutions involved conduct in China. Two of those China resolutions involved payments to health care providers, a reminder that such payments must be handled carefully in China and other countries where many hospitals are state-owned entities.

We have noted previously the importance of designing compliance programs that are sensitive to the risks posed by third-party payments. In 2015, as in recent years, third parties were involved in the majority of FCPA cases that required entering into a resolution with the government. Both of the DOJ corporate resolutions and six of the nine SEC corporate resolutions involved allegedly improper payments made through third parties.

The continued focus on compliance programs crystallized last year with the Fraud Section's hiring of Hui Chen as a dedicated compliance expert. Chen will assist section attorneys in evaluating company presentations about their compliance programs (which usually take place in the context of Filip factors analyses), will interface with monitors concerning their oversight of companies that have previously resolved with the DOJ, and will train DOJ attorneys on the features of an effective compliance program.

In addition, after several years of news reports about financial institution hiring cases, 2015 saw the first resolution of one. BNY Mellon—without admitting or denying the allegations—resolved the SEC's investigation into whether it hired interns in order to obtain business from a Middle East sovereign wealth fund. The SEC's Order sheds light on a gray area in FCPA enforcement: when, in the government's view, does hiring cross over from relationship building or providing a business courtesy into bestowing a benefit on an official that is corrupt under the statute. WilmerHale represented BNY Mellon in this matter. The case, and the government's other 2015 resolutions, are discussed in more detail in Section III of this alert.

Finally, the DOJ had its wings clipped—ever so slightly—by two rulings that limited its ability to use conspiracy charges to pursue individuals who did not actually carry out any acts within the United States: United States v. Hoskins, No. 3:12-CR-00238-JBA, 2015 WL 4774918 (D. Conn. Aug. 13, 2015), and United States v. Sidorenko, 102 F. Supp. 3d 1124 (N.D. Cal. 2015). These rulings, which are consistent with a 2011 ruling in the "Africa Sting" case that addressed a similar issue without a written opinion, give some comfort to individuals and entities abroad who do not fall into the traditional categories for FCPA liability. The overall jurisdictional reach of the FCPA remains exceedingly broad, however, and there are no legal developments on the horizon that would change that.

DOWNLOAD PDF: Global Anti-Bribery Year-in-Review: 2015 Developments and Predictions for 2016

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions