United States: The Supreme Court's Take On Kirtsaeng II Will Impact Attorneys' Fees Decisions In Copyright Matters

The landmark copyright case Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons is back before the US Supreme Court, this time on the issue of the appropriate standard for determining whether to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Whatever its outcome, this decision will have important implications for plaintiffs and defendants alike in copyright and possibly other intellectual property cases.

In 2013, the Supreme Court decided Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons I, a dispute over gray-market copyrighted material (plaintiff publisher's textbooks) produced overseas for foreign markets but imported to the United States and resold without plaintiff's permission. Publisher John Wiley & Sons sued the defendant, a graduate student who had legally purchased the books overseas and sold them for a profit in the United States, on eBay, for copyright infringement. The Supreme Court concluded that the "First Sale" doctrine (codified at 17 U.S.C. §109(a)) applied and that defendant could not be liable for copyright infringement, thereby reversing the Second Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to the contrary. Kirtsaeng I, 133 S. Ct. 1351 (2013).

On remand, the defendant, Mr. Kirtsaeng, sought to recover his attorney's fees as the prevailing party.  After both the district court and Second Circuit denied his claim for fees, Kirtsaeng successfully petitioned the Supreme Court to hear his case again, this time arguing that the Second Circuit's standard for awarding attorney's fees in copyright cases "splits with the approaches of the other courts of appeals" and is inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent. (Granting petition for certiorari, January 15, 2016; Dkt. No. 15-375). The parties' positions are summarized below.

Petitioner Under the Copyright Act, a "court may ... award a reasonable attorney's fee to the prevailing party." 17 U.S.C. § 505. Kirtsaeng asserts that the various circuits' application of this statutory language has varied widely, from simply asking "whether the prevailing party's claim or defense furthered the interests of the Copyright Act, with no presumptions one way or the other" (Ninth and Eleventh Circuits), to applying a presumption in favor of a fee award for prevailing parties (Fifth and Seventh Circuits), to applying some or all of the four "nonexclusive factors" (i.e., "frivolousness, motivation, objective unreasonableness ...[,] and ... considerations of compensation and deterrence") listed in Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517, 534 n.19 (1994) (Third, Fourth, and Sixth Circuits).  Kirtsaeng contends that the Second Circuit's approach is unique among the circuits:  while acknowledging the four factors mentioned in Fogerty, the Second Circuit places "'substantial weight' on whether the losing party's claim or defense was objectively unreasonable—which is to say, whether the losing party's claim was clearly without merit or devoid of legal or factual basis." According to Kirtsaeng, this creates a "presumption against awarding fees."

Kirtsaeng further asserts that the Second Circuit's standard makes fees for prevailing defendants "a rare punishment against plaintiffs who brought frivolous, baseless, or unreasonable lawsuits."  As such, it is allegedly contrary to the Supreme Court's decision in Fogerty, which rejected a "'dual' standard" treating prevailing plaintiffs "differently" from prevailing defendants. 510 U.S. at 520, 533. Because "a successful defense of a copyright infringement action may further the policies of the Copyright Act," defendants should "be encouraged to litigate them to the same extent that plaintiffs are encouraged to litigate meritorious claims of infringement." Id. at 527. Kirtsaeng argues that the Second Circuit's approach is "not evenhanded" on its face (because its opinions "speak... only to the objectively reasonable claims of a copyright holder, not of those by an accused defendant"), and its "practical effect is that prevailing plaintiffs much more easily obtain fee awards than prevailing defendants (emphasis added)."

Respondent Publisher Wiley argues that Kirtsaeng's "description of an elaborate multi-faceted circuit split" combines "a caricature of the law of the Second Circuit with exaggerated descriptions of differences with other circuits." According to Wiley, what Kirtsaeng characterizes as a circuit "split" amounts to nothing more than courts "using their best judgment" in applying "the equitable multi-factor" test approved in Fogerty. Far from being an "outlier" among federal appellate courts, the Second Circuit's emphasis on Fogerty's "objective reasonableness" factor is derived from "examining the approaches of other federal appellate courts. . . . Indeed, a review of section 505 cases reveals that every circuit emphasizes objective reasonableness." Nor does placing substantial weight on whether a party's actions and arguments were objectively unreasonable disfavor prevailing defendants, argues Wiley. "While [Kirtsaeng's] defenses may have furthered" the purposes of copyright law, "so did [Wiley's] claims," and it was "within the district court's discretion to decide how to strike the right incentives balance under section 505."

In short, the courts below did not rely on "objective reasonableness" alone or rely on an unfair presumption, Wiley contends. Instead, they "specifically considered and applied all four Fogerty factors," focusing on "how the facts and incentives at play in this case related to the purposes of the Copyright Act. . . .[T]he weight the Second Circuit places on objective reasonableness is fully consistent with treating plaintiffs and defendants evenhandedly as Fogerty mandated. It encourages the presentation and litigation of reasonable arguments by both plaintiffs and defendants to clarify the law of copyright."

Both parties contend there are also important public policy considerations at stake. Kirtsaeng asserts that the evenhanded approach to fees mandated by Fogerty is "particularly important in David vs. Goliath cases like this one," in which the plaintiff "brought its substantial resources to bear . . . against impecunious individual defendants and then engag[ed] in scorched-earth litigation tactics to force those individual defendants to give in and settle." Yet it is equally true that the law was still unsettled and not clearly on Kirtsaeng's side when Wiley sued. The Supreme Court itself had split 4-4 on the same First Sale doctrine issue in Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega S.A., 562 U.S. 40 (2010) not long before Wiley brought suit. As a result, it may be difficult to characterize Wiley's election to sue as "unreasonable."  Assessing fees in such circumstances could deter the bringing of meritorious copyright cases that are necessary to test and set the boundaries of the law, argues Wiley.

Regardless of whether Kirtsaeng is correct in describing the circuit courts' standards as widely varying, or whether Wiley is correct in characterizing the alleged circuit "split" as essentially the petitioner's invention, the Court has now taken up the standard for awarding attorneys' fees in copyright cases. This case bears close attention to see what impact the resulting decision will have on the recent trend in intellectual property cases toward adopting a "loser pays" approach (cf. Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.,  572 U.S. ____ (Dkt. No. 12-1184; 2014)).

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Sep 2018, Conference, New York, United States

Dentons is delighted to support a global IT services and consulting firm Miratech as an event host partner at their annual conference called M-Force18 New York on September 27th. The event will be held at Dentons New York office in the heart of Midtown Manhattan, opposite Rockefeller Center.

2 Oct 2018, Seminar, Dallas, United States

We are pleased to offer a program of five sessions designed specifically for in-house counsel. Topics will include:

  • In-house corporate ethical issues
  • What recent Supreme Court decisions mean for business
  • Keeping lawyers out of your benefit plans
  • Litigation tactics for in-house counsel
  • Employment issues in the age of #MeToo
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Fenwick & West LLP
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Fenwick & West LLP
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions