United States: Delaware Chancery Court Rejects Disclosure-Only Settlement In Trulia/Zillow Merger Litigation, Making Clear Such Settlements Will Be Subject To "Increasingly Vigilant" Scrutiny

Last Updated: February 1 2016
Article by James J. Beha, II, Judson E. Lobdell and Justin D. Mayer

On January 22, 2016, Delaware Chancellor Andre C. Bouchard rejected a proposed "disclosure-only" settlement in In re Trulia Stockholder Litigation.1 The decision confirms the Chancery Court's growing skepticism for disclosure-only settlements in merger litigation.

In In re Trulia, the Delaware Chancery Court rejected a proposed disclosure-only settlement of a shareholder suit challenging the merger between Trulia and Zillow. In declining to approve this proposed settlement, Chancellor Bouchard explained that "to the extent that litigants continue to pursue disclosure settlements, they can expect that the Court will be increasingly vigilant in scrutinizing the 'give' and the 'get' of such settlements to ensure that they are genuinely fair and reasonable to the absent class members."2

In re Trulia continues the recent trend in Delaware closely scrutinizing disclosure-only settlements of merger cases. For example, in In re Riverbed Technology, Inc. Stockholders Litigation, Vice Chancellor Glasscock approved a proposed disclosure-only settlement, but expressed concern about the practice of settling merger challenges (and releasing shareholders' claims) based on supplemental disclosures. The Court noted that reliance on the Court's previous practice of approving these settlements "will be diminished or eliminated going forward in light of this Memorandum Opinion and other decisions of this Court."3 Vice Chancellor Glasscock explained that, in the future, "the interests of the Class might merit rejection of a settlement encompassing a release that goes far beyond the claims asserted and the results achieved."4

BACKGROUND

In re Trulia involved a proposed settlement of a stockholder class action challenging Zillow, Inc.'s acquisition of Trulia, Inc. in a stock-for-stock merger that was announced in July 2014 and closed in February 2015. Under the merger agreement, Zillow would acquire Trulia for approximately $3.5 billion in stock.

After the announcement of the merger, in four nearly identical class action complaints, Trulia stockholders sought to enjoin the proposed merger alleging breaches of fiduciary duties by Trulia directors in approving the proposed merger at an unfair exchange ratio. On October 13, 2014, the court granted an unopposed motion to consolidate the four cases into one action and to appoint lead counsel.

Nearly four months after these challenges, the parties reached an agreement-in-principle to settle. On November 19, 2014, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding detailing the agreement-in-principle to settle the litigation for certain disclosures to supplement those contained in the proxy. Under the proposed settlement, Trulia, Inc. agreed to provide additional information in its proxy materials, and plaintiffs agreed to drop their motion to preliminarily enjoin the merger and would provide a release of claims on behalf of a proposed class of Trulia's shareholders. After receiving briefing and an affidavit from plaintiffs advocating for approval of the settlement, on September 16, 2015, Chancellor Bouchard held a hearing to consider the fairness of the proposed settlement.

THE COURT'S ANALYSIS

In a January 22, 2016, decision, Chancellor Bouchard wrote that "[u]nder Court of Chancery Rule 23, the Court must approve the dismissal or settlement of a class action," and that "the fiduciary character of a class action requires the Court to independently examine the fairness of a class action settlement before approving it."5 The Court added that "[i]n doing so, the Court evaluates not only the claim, possible defenses, and obstacles to its successful prosecution, but also the reasonableness of the 'give' and the 'get,' or what the class members receive in exchange for ending the litigation."6

The Court highlighted the difficulties of evaluating the fairness of a proposed settlement when "little or no motion practice has occurred and the discovery record is sparse, as is typically the case in an expedited deal litigation leading to an equally expedited resolution based on supplemental disclosures before the transaction closes."7 The Court pointed out that "[i]n this case, . . . no motions were decided . . . , and discovery was limited to the production of less than 3,000 pages of documents and the taking of three depositions . . . ."8 This "lack of an adversarial process often requires that the Court become essentially a forensic examiner of proxy materials so that it can play devil's advocate in probing the value of the 'get' for stockholders in a proposed disclosure settlement."9

The Court offered that "the optimal means by which disclosure claims in deal litigation should be adjudicated is outside the context of a proposed settlement so that the Court's consideration of the merits of the disclosure claims can occur in an adversarial process where the defendants' desire to obtain a release does not hang in the balance."10

Under these circumstances, the Court held that the proposed settlement was not fair or reasonable to Trulia stockholders. The Court found that none of the four specific supplemental disclosures in this matter "were material or even helpful to Trulia's stockholders."11 Chancellor Bouchard explained that "[a]s such, from the perspective of Trulia's stockholders, the 'get' in the form of the Supplemental Disclosures does not provide adequate consideration to warrant the 'give' of providing a release of claims to defendants and their affiliates . . . ."12

Most significantly, the Court warned practitioners of "enhanced judicial scrutiny" of disclosure settlements and that "practitioners should expect that the Court will continue to be increasingly vigilant in applying its independent judgment to its case-by-case assessment of the reasonableness of the 'give' and 'get' of [disclosure] settlements . . . ."13 An exception, however, might be "supplemental disclosures address[ing] a plainly material misrepresentation or omission" where "the subject matter of the proposed release is narrowly circumscribed."14

CONCLUSION

In In re Trulia, Chancellor Bouchard explained that Delaware courts will closely scrutinize disclosure settlements and will assess the reasonableness of the "give" and "get" of such settlements. Chancellor Bouchard stressed that "the historical predisposition that has been shown towards approving disclosure settlements must evolve," and future proposed disclosure-only merger litigation settlements will likely be met with significant skepticism in Delaware. Thus, while the court stated that "[t]he percentage of settlements in Delaware based solely on supplemental disclosures was 63.6% in 2013 and 70.6% in 2014,"15 this may be a declining trend in Delaware in years to come.

Footnotes

 1 In re Trulia, Inc. Stockholder Litig., C.A. No. 10020-CB, 2016 Del. Ch. LEXIS 8 (Del. Ch. Jan. 22, 2016).

2 Id. at *4-*5.

3 C.A. No. 10484-VCG, 2015 Del. Ch. LEXIS 241, at *20 (Del. Ch. Sept. 17, 2015).

4 In re Trulia Stockholder Litig., 2016 Del. Ch. at *21-*22.

5 Id. at *13.

6 Id. at *13 (internal quotation marks omitted).

7 Id. at *21.

8 Id. at *21.

9 Id. at *22.

10 Id. at *29.

11 Id. at *60; see also id. at *39-*40 (identifying the supplemental disclosures as solely concerning a section of the proxy summarizing a financial analysis of the transaction, "providing additional details concerning: (1) certain synergy numbers in . . . value creation analysis; (2) selected comparable transaction multiples; (3) selected public trading multiples; and (4) implied terminal EBITDA multiples for a relative cash flow analysis.").

12 Id. at *60.

13 Id. at *35.

14 Id. at *35.

15 Id. at n.28.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
James J. Beha, II
Justin D. Mayer
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions