United States: Art Appropriation Redux

Last Updated: January 6 2016
Article by Joshua J. Kaufman and Thai Nguyen (Summer Associate)

Art appropriation is back in the news.

Jeff Koons the appropriation artist, the auction house and the consigner of the work are being sued by photographer Mitchel Gray for the use of his photograph in an artwork without permission. This is Mr. Koons' sixth lawsuit for claims of copyright infringement based on the misappropriation of previously existing works. Mr. Koons is 1 for 5 in the previous cases. In this case, Mr. Gray took a photograph of a couple on the beach for a Gordon's Gin ad in 1986.

Later that year, as part of his series Luxury and Degradation, Mr. Koons reproduced the photograph in its entirety and most of the ad with some slight variations (the "Koons Artwork").

The Koons Artwork, and case, raises three issues that anyone who creates or sells art which incorporates third party intellectual property must deal with, specifically copyright claims, Right of Publicity claims and trademark claims. While the Gray lawsuit is limited to copyright claims other questions that are not raised are present in Koons Artwork --- did Koons also violate Gordon's trademark rights and the Right of Publicity of the two models in the photograph? The suit provides us with an opportunity to review the current state of the law in regard to the appropriation of other's copyrightable artwork, trademarks, and likenesses in a new work.

In the last few years, a review of copyright cases shows that the pendulum has swung in favor of Fair Use, particularly in New York and California. There are two cases, in the Court of Appeals in New York - one dealing with art and one not (the Google Books case), which have taken an expansive view towards fair use. The most exciting or troubling (depending on your point of view) art law case is Cariou v. Prince, 714 F.3d 694 (2d Cir. 2013). In Cariou v. Prince, artist Richard Prince was sued for appropriating dozens of photographers by Patrick Cariou. Cariou had published black-and-white portraits and landscapes that he took while living in Jamaica. Prince tore photos from Cariou's book and incorporated them into his own artwork, altering them in varying degrees and pinning them to plywood. Prince's work was subsequently featured at a gallery, and Cariou sued. To find fair use, the Second Circuit requires the new work to be transformative that is it "must alter the original with new expression, meaning, or message." The court found Prince's work was significantly different in size, color, and distorted nature, that his works were "fundamentally different and new." The Court also found that the law imposes no requirement that a work comment on the original, or its author, in order to be considered transformative; and a secondary work may constitute a fair use even if it serves some purpose other than those (criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research) identified in the preamble to the statute. The court further held that the more transformative a new work is, the less important the other four fair use factors become. The court broke new ground in finding fair use when it stated,

[whose decision of no fair use it over turned] based its conclusion that Prince's work is not transformative in large part on Prince's deposition testimony that he "do[es]n't really have a message," that he was not "trying to create anything with a new meaning or a new message," and that he "do[es]n't have any ... interest in [Cariou's] original intent. On appeal, Cariou argues that we must hold Prince to his testimony and that we are not to consider how Prince's works may reasonably be perceived unless Prince claims that they were satire or parody. No such rule exists, and we do not analyze satire or parody differently from any other transformative use.

It is not surprising that, when transformative use is at issue, the alleged infringer would go to great lengths to explain and defend his use as transformative. Prince did not do so here. However, the fact that Prince did not provide those sorts of explanations in his deposition which might have lent strong support to his defense is not dispositive. What is critical is how the work in question appears to the reasonable observer, not simply what an artist might say about a particular piece or body of work. Prince's work could be transformative even without commenting on Cariou's work or on culture, and even without Prince's stated intention to do so. Rather than confining our inquiry to Prince's explanations of his artworks, we instead examine how the artworks may "reasonably be perceived" in order to assess their analysis is primarily on the Prince artworks themselves, and we see twenty-five of them as transformative as a

In essence the court held that even if the artist does not claim the work is transformative if the judges think the public will that is enough. The Second Circuit's analysis, as a result, greatly broadens judges' discretion of what is transformative and thus what is a fair use.

In California there is an instructive case of an artist, Derek Seltzer (Seltzer v. Green Day, Inc., 725 F.31 1170 (9th Cir, 2013)). The Ninth Circuit, found that Green Day's use of the artist's drawing in its video backdrop was protected by fair use. In Green Day, artist Derek Seltzer created an art work entitled Scream Icon and arranged posters of it on walls across Los Angeles as street art. Green Day's set designer happened to come across the artwork, photographed it, and later used it in the band's video backdrop. The Scream Icon was modified for the video, and other artists were featured further altering it, as the video played. Seltzer sued for copyright infringement.

In ruling for Green Day, the court emphasized that the band's use was sufficiently transformative because different colors, contrast, a brick background, and a superimposed red crucifix were added to the artwork. Moreover, the video's message of religious hypocrisy had nothing to do with the Scream Icon's original meaning. Even though the Scream Icon was concurrently used with the band's concerts, this was only "incidentally commercial," because it was not used to promote the concerts or merchandise. Because Green Day's use conveyed "new information, new aesthetics, new insights, and understandings," it was transformative and fair.

In Wisconsin there is another case, Kienitz v. Sconnie Nation LLC, 766 F.3d 756 (7th Cir. 2014), where the court took a different approach to fair use then did the Cariou and Green Day courts. In Kienitz, the Seventh Circuit openly criticized the Second Circuit's interpretation of the Fair Use Doctrine in Cariou. Here, Michael Kienitz photographed Madison, Wisconsin mayor Paul Soglin, and subsequently posted that photograph on the city's website. Apparel company Sonnie Nation, LLC ("Sonnie Nation") downloaded the Mayor's photograph from the website, altered its color and details, and printed the new image onto t-shirts with the phrase "Sorry for Partying."

Relying in part on Cariou, the district court ruled in favor of Sonnie Nation based on the t-shirt's transformative nature. The Seventh Circuit affirmed, but on different grounds. It warned that the Second Circuit's interpretation of fair use compromises, and possibly eliminates, a copyright holder's statutory right to prevent others from making derivative works. Instead, the Seventh Circuit opted to "stick with the statutory list, of which the most important usually is the fourth [factor] (market effect)" to find fair use. The court did find fair use but looked at all four factor in the statue to arrive at its conclusion. The take away is if one is going to appropriate someone's artwork New York and California are the places to be sued in.

In terms of the use of an individuals' likenesses, we deal with the Right of Publicity, which unlike copyright, is at least supposed to be uniform across the country. The Right of Publicity is governed under individual state statutes or common law. Generally speaking, the courts have favored artists in this area, although not universally. It is important to note that courts have often found distinctions between the use of a celebrity's likeness in fine art when used on an original, limited edition or print versus licensing the same artwork found on commercial products. Certain courts do not find a distinction, once they find the use to be a fair use under the Right of Publicity for the underlying art it doesn't matter on what product it is put on. Others courts have taken a more "First Amendment" expressive speech approach and have carved out exceptions to the Right of Publicity but only for fine arts not for licensed goods. Below is a review of four of the leading cases in the area.

In Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. Gary Saderup, Inc., 25 Cal. 4th 387 (Cal. 2001) the Supreme Court of California ruled against artist Gary Saderup for producing lithographs and T-shirts bearing the likeness of The Three Stooges.

To continue reading this article, please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.