United States: JUVENILE JUSTICE - A Look At How One Case Changed The Certification Process

Last Updated: December 30 2015
Article by Jack Carnegie

Imagine if your child were arrested and interrogated without your knowledge, without being read his or her rights, or without being taken before a magistrate. Then imagine if your child were certified for trial as an adult and sentenced to 30 years in prison. You're probably thinking, Not my child; only the worst of the worst—violent gang members, repeat offenders, or hardened criminals— are certified as adults.

That's what I thought. Then I got a call from a former colleague, Christene Wood, that began six years of pro bono work culminating in a decision by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and significant legislative reforms to the juvenile certification system.1

The call concerned a 16-year-old boy named Cameron Moon, a friend of Wood's daughter. Wood had known Moon for a number of years and described him as "a really nice kid." Unfortunately, he had gotten in "some trouble," and a few days earlier the juvenile court had certified him to be tried as an adult. The "trouble" turned out to be an alleged shooting during a drug deal. Moon, however, was not known as the type of child one would expect to be involved in that kind of incident. He was in school, passing his classes, and had no history of gang activity, violence, or disciplinary problems at school.

Moon was unable to afford bail. Like other children deemed "adults," he was now in jail, being kept in solitary confinement 23 hours a day until he turned 17 to "protect" him from the other prisoners. He had no right to appeal the certification order until after his criminal trial.2 Moon was tried as an adult, convicted, and sentenced to 30 years in prison.

As lawyers, we should all want the judicial process to be applied fairly and with integrity; as parents, it is the minimum expectation we should have for our children. When I saw the realities of certification as applied by the juvenile courts in this case, it was clear the process was broken.

ADULT CERTIFICATION: THEORY AND PURPOSE AND THE REALITIES

Juvenile proceedings are civil matters generally governed by the Family Code and the Rules of Civil Procedure.3 The process commonly referred to as certification involves the juvenile court waiving its exclusive original jurisdiction and transferring the child to criminal court.4 It has been characterized as "the single most serious act the juvenile court can perform ... because once waiver of jurisdiction occurs, the child loses all protective and rehabilitative possibilities available."5 Certification is intended to be reserved for "exceptional cases"; the legislative philosophy is that "whenever possible, 'children should be protected and rehabilitated rather than subjected to the harshness of the criminal system. ...' "6

The Family Code is therefore designed to "limit the juvenile court's discretion in making the transfer determination."7 It prohibits courts from certifying children as adults based on the category of the crime alone. Instead, if the state seeks certification, certain objective factors concerning the child's age and type of crime alleged must first be met.8 The juvenile court must then "order and obtain a complete diagnostic study, social evaluation, and full investigation of the child"9 and assess a list of statutory factors specific to the individual child to determine whether "the welfare of the community requires criminal proceedings."10 Those include:

  • whether the offense was against person or property;
  • the sophistication and maturity of the child;
  • the record and previous history of the child; and
  • the prospects for adequate protection of the public and the likelihood of rehabilitation of the child.11

If the juvenile court waives jurisdiction, the statute directs it to "state specifically" in a written order "its reasons for waiver ... and findings of the court."12

That was the theory. The reality proved different. Between 1997 and 2008, juvenile courts in Harris County certified 1,524 children as adults and denied the state's certification requests only 83 times—a certification rate of 95 percent. Courts typically held only abbreviated hearings and used form orders making the same stock findings in every case. Some of those findings had no apparent relation to the ultimate question of whether the welfare of the community required criminal proceedings. Far from being reserved for exceptional cases, certification—when requested by the state—was virtually automatic.

Despite this, appellate courts almost never reversed certifications. Children who had IQs in the 70s with an "overall maturity of a nine to 11-year-old child" had been held sufficiently "sophisticated and mature" based on nothing more than "some evidence" that they were capable of assisting counsel in their defense.13 Findings like these confuse bare competency to stand trial14 with the kind of sophistication and maturity that suggests this is the rare type of child for which the welfare of the community requires criminal proceedings rather than rehabilitation.

MOON'S CERTIFICATION AND LANDMARK APPEAL

In Moon's case, the state never obtained the statutorily required diagnostic study and evaluation to assess factors like maturity and rehabilitation. During the certification hearing, it presented only one witness who testified solely about the circumstances of the alleged crime. The juvenile court made no finding that Moon's "record and previous history" supported certification.

The remainder of the court's order was much like the forms used many times before. It recited that Moon was "of sufficient sophistication and maturity to have ... waived all constitutional rights heretofore waived," never mind that he had waived no rights and that, by statute, juveniles lack the capacity to waive rights regardless of their supposed sophistication.15

It also found Moon to be sophisticated and mature enough "to have aided in the preparation of HIS defense." The state, however, introduced no such evidence. Even if it had, it is difficult to fathom why the welfare of the community requires adult criminal proceedings simply because a child can help his lawyer.

Parroting the language of the statute, it also found "little, if any, prospect of adequate protection of the public and likelihood of reasonable rehabilitation. ..." This was despite ample uncontroverted testimony that Moon presented no danger and was a prime candidate for rehabilitation. Officers who had supervised him in juvenile detention voluntarily came forward to testify on his behalf, stating that he was "one of the best kids" they had seen and that he was never "aggressive" or "mean-spirited."16 Finally, the juvenile court said certification was more "convenient."17

After Moon was convicted, we appealed the certification ruling. We had substantial amicus support from a number of juvenile justice organizations. The Court of Appeals held that the juvenile court had abused its discretion and reversed Moon's certification—the first juvenile certification reversal in Texas in more than 25 years, according to the Houston Chronicle.18 It found that the state had presented no evidence of Moon's sophistication and maturity and insufficient evidence on the protection of the public and rehabilitation issue.19

After granting the State's Petition for Discretionary Review, the Court of Criminal Appeals went further. In addition to affirming the appeals court's rulings, it rejected the use of printed form orders and required juvenile courts to "show their work" by making individualized fact findings to allow appellate courts to determine whether the juvenile court's "decision was in fact appropriately guided by the statutory criteria, principled, and reasonable. ..."20

It also held that the stock "sophistication and maturity" finding regarding "the juvenile's capacity to waive his constitutional rights and help a lawyer to effectively represent him" was legally wrong and "almost as misguided as the juvenile court's logic ... when it orally pronounced that [Moon] should be transferred ... merely for the sake of judicial economy. ..." It characterized this as "the very antithesis of the kind of individualized assessment ... expect[ed] of the juvenile court in the exercise of its transfer discretion."21

In part because of the Moon case, the Legislature, in a law that became effective September 1, 2015, has restored the right to immediately appeal certification orders.22 In conjunction with that law, the Texas Supreme Court has issued an order requiring juvenile courts to inform juveniles and their attorneys of the right to appeal and specifying that the appeal is governed by the rules applicable to accelerated appeals.23 This means the notice of appeal must be filed within 20 days of the certification order.24

The Court of Criminal Appeals decision, and the Legislature's restoration of the right to appeal a certification order immediately, is real progress in ensuring that the certification statute is properly and fairly applied. Yet much remains to be done. Is a child who was wrongly certified subject to being recertified on remand and, if so, under what standard? As the statute is written, when a child turns 18, the same statutory certification requirements described above do not apply.25 If subjected to those different procedures, a child who was wrongly certified will never receive the procedural and substantive protections that were originally due. Whether the state, on remand, can constitutionally change the certification rules after being unable to meet its original burden remains to be seen.

The author would like to acknowledge the great contributions of Christene Wood and John Hagan who worked with him on the Moon appeal.

Footnotes

1. Moon v. State, 451 S.W.3d 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

2. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.47(b) (repealed eff. Sept. 1, 2015).

3. See Tex. Fam. Code § 51.17(a).

4. See Tex. Fam. Code § 54.02.

5. Hidalgo v. State of Texas, 983 S.W.2d 746, 755 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

6. Hidalgo, 983 S.W.2d at 754 (emphasis added). See Lanes v. State, 767 S.W.2d 789, 795 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989). There is a great deal of science on juvenile brain development that demonstrates why juveniles are more disposed to impulsive acts and more amenable to rehabilitation than adults. This is why the U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Eighth Amendment bars capital punishment and mandatory life sentences without parole for juveniles. See Roper v. Simmons, 125 S. Ct. 1183 (2005); Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).

7. Hidalgo, 983 S.W.2d at 754.

8. Tex. Fam. Code § 54.02(a)(1), (2).

9. Tex. Fam. Code § 54.02(d). See Hidalgo, 983 S.W.2d at 754. Accord In re B.T., 323 S.W.3d 158 (Tex. 2010).

10. Tex. Fam. Code § 54.02(a)(3).

11. Tex. Fam. Code § 54.02(f).

12. Tex. Fam. Code § 54.02(h).

13. See, e.g., In the Matter of K.D.S., 808 S.W.2d 299, 300-303 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, no writ).

14. See Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975).

15. Tex. Fam. Code § 51.09, § 53.06(e). See In the Matter of D.W.M., 562 S.W.2d 851, 853 (Tex. 1978) (per curiam).

16. See Moon v. State, 410 S.W.3d 366, 376 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013).

17. Cause #2008-06648J; Cert. Hearing Tr. at 128-132.

18. Lauren McGaughy, Reversals of teens' move to adult court raise questions about process, Houston Chronicle (January 2, 2015), available at http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/politics/texas/article/Reversals-of-teens-move-to-adult-court-raise-5990878.php.

19. Moon v. State, 410 S.W.3d at 375-378.

20. Moon v. State, 451 S.W.3d 28, 49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

21. Moon v. State, 451 S.W.3d at 50 n.87.

22. See 2015 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. ch. 74 (S.B. 888) (Vernon's); Tex. Fam. Code § 56.01(c)(1)(A).

23. See Misc. Docket No. 15-9156 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015).

24. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b).

25. See Tex. Fam. Code § 54.02(j).

Previously published in the Texas Bar Journal

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Jack Carnegie
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.