United States: Illinois Appellate Court Reverses Attorney General Binding Opinions On Open Meetings Issues

Mark E. Burkland is Senior Counsel and Peter M. Friedman is a Partner in our in our Chicago office.


  • The Illinois Appellate Court has upheld a trial court's reversal of two Illinois Attorney General binding opinions related to the Illinois Open Meetings Act (OMA).
  • An important impact of the appellate court's decision in Board of Education of Springfield School District No. 186 v. Attorney General of Illinois et al is its clarification that the courts will not afford substantial weight and deference to the attorney general's interpretations of unambiguous provisions of the OMA.
  • The appellate court's decision is a firm reminder that the attorney general may not expand the requirements of the OMA through its administrative rulings.

In Board of Education of Springfield School District No. 186 v. Attorney General of Illinois et al., 2015 IL App (4th) 140941, the Illinois Appellate Court upheld a trial court's reversal of two Illinois Attorney General binding opinions related to the Illinois Open Meetings Act (OMA). In its Dec. 15, 2015, decision, the appellate court first ruled that signatures on an employee separation agreement made during a closed session was not "final action" in violation of the OMA when the public body thereafter publicly discussed and voted on the agreement in open session during a regular meeting.

The appellate court then ruled that the public body did not fail to properly notice or inform the public about the separation agreement at the public meeting, because the school board posted the agreement on its website four days before approval, listed the agreement clearly on the meeting agenda and discussed the agreement before any vote was taken.

In the long run, the most important impact of the appellate court's decision may be its clarification that the courts will not afford substantial weight and deference to the attorney general's interpretations of unambiguous provisions of the OMA. The appellate court's decision, parts of which are critical of the attorney general's positions, is a firm reminder that the attorney general may not expand the requirements of the OMA through its administrative rulings.


The binding opinions by the Illinois Attorney General related to actions on a single matter taken by the Board of Education of Springfield School District 186. In a Feb. 4, 2013 closed session, the school board discussed a separation agreement for its superintendent, who already knew he was being fired. Six of the seven school board members signed the agreement while in closed session, though none of them dated their signatures.

The school district on March 1 published the agenda for its March 5 meeting on its website. The agenda included a line item for "Approval of a Resolution" regarding the separation agreement, naming the superintendent. The agenda also included a link to the website page on which the school board had posted the full agreement. At its March 5 meeting, the school board voted to approve the agreement and then added the March 5 date to the signatures already on the agreement.

Attorney General's First Binding Opinion

In response to a request for review from a local newspaper, the attorney general in May 2013 issued a binding opinion that the signing of the separation agreement in the Feb. 4 closed session was final action on the agreement in violation of Section 2(e) of the OMA. Section 2(e) forbids final action in a closed session:

Sec. 2. Open meetings.

*    *    *

(e) Final action. No final action may be taken at a closed meeting. Final action shall be preceded by a public recital of the nature of the matter being considered and other information that will inform the public of the business being conducted.

In its opinion, the attorney general also stated that even if the school board could properly act on the separation agreement at its March 4 meeting, the school board failed to adequately inform the public about the agreement.

The school board appealed the attorney general's decision to the Illinois Circuit Court, which in November 2013 reversed the attorney general's ruling on the "final action" issue, but remanded the "adequately informed" issue so that the school board could respond.

Attorney General's Second Binding Opinion

In April 2014, the attorney general issued its second binding opinion on the "adequately informed" issue, finding that posting the separation agreement in its entirety on the school board's website four days before the March 4, 2013 meeting "did not constitute a public recital during an open meeting within the scope of section 2(e) ... ."

The case went back to the circuit court, which reversed the attorney general again. The circuit court found that the attorney general's opinion "significantly expands" the requirement under Section 2(e) and the attorney general had offered no authority that supported such an expansion.

Appellate Court Decision

The appellate court considered first the standard of review to apply to the appeal. The attorney general urged the court to give substantial weight and deference to her interpretations because of the attorney general's role in administering and enforcing the OMA. The court noted, however, that such deference applies only to interpretations of ambiguous statutes, and not to the attorney general's interpretation of the plain, unambiguous language of Section 2(e). The court stated that review of the attorney general's opinions was de novo, and thus not deferential.

The appellate court then rejected the attorney general's legal analysis on the "final action" issue, finding that no Illinois court has previously invalidated an action in closed session like the school board's when a public discussion and vote was taken subsequently.

In this case, the appellate court explained that the school board clearly took final action in open session at its March 4, 2013 meeting. The action in closed session on Feb. 4 was not final action, the court wrote, because the OMA states that actions in closed session cannot be final actions. Though this reasoning may seem a bit circular, common sense leads to the conclusion that the school board took final action on the separation agreement at its March 4 meeting because it understood it could not do so during the Feb. 4 closed session. Further, there was no evidence in the record that either the school board or the separating superintendent took any action consistent with the attorney general's conclusion that the deal was completed at the Feb. 4 closed session.

The appellate court noted that earlier court rulings establish that no public body can take final action merely by circulating a document for signature and not voting on it publicly. See Howe v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund, 2013 Il App (1st) 122446. Further, under similar circumstances the Illinois Supreme Court rejected the notion that preparing and signing a document in closed session violates the OMA when the public body subsequently acts in open session. See Grissom v. Board of Education of Buckley-Loda Community School District No. 8, 75 Ill. 2d 314 (1979).

The appellate court also rejected the attorney general's position that the school board was required to take actions to inform the public in addition to publishing the separation agreement on its website, listing it on its meeting agenda and introducing it at its meeting. The court found that these actions satisfy the standard set in Section 2(e) of the OMA.

The appellate court criticized the attorney general for her assertion that the public was "ill informed" about the agreement because "they were not given details." The court noted that the attorney general "does not support her claim with competent authority or elaborate further as to what additional information the Board could have provided the public that would have constituted sufficient notice under her interpretation of section 2(e)." The court also rejected the attorney general's request that it consider extrinsic evidence of the intent of the legislator who sponsored the amendment to Section 2(e) in 1989 that set the "adequately informed" standard.


The decision in Board of Education of Springfield School District No. 186 v. Attorney General of Illinois confirms that public bodies that abide by the statutory requirements in the Illinois Open Meetings Act will not also be held to ad hoc administrative determinations.  

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions