United States: Will Section 363 Become A New Chapter Of The Bankruptcy Code?

Last Updated: December 14 2015
Article by Leslie Berkoff and Theresa A. Driscoll

During the volatile economic climate of recent years, expedited 363 sales have been favored over more traditional reorganizations under Chapter 11. The benefits of facilitating a quick sale under §363 of the Bankruptcy Code have often served as the impetus for many Chapter 11 case filings of large public companies. The use of expedited 363 sales prior to, or in place of, plan confirmation has generated much debate among the bankruptcy bench, bar and creditor groups. The competing tension at the heart of this debate is whether a fast track sale prior to the filing of a plan is justified in light of the resultant impact on well-established procedural and substantive rules designed to address stakeholder due process and bankruptcy protections in bankruptcy. Notwithstanding this debate, however, bankruptcy courts throughout the nation have approved these types of sales in light of competent evidence of deteriorating asset values.

Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code originally was enacted as a tool to allow debtors to shed unnecessary or burdensome assets in furtherance of their reorganization effort1 (although, at times, it did become a last resort for a failed struggling company). Following the 2008 financial crisis, many banks were reluctant or unwilling to provide post-petition financing, leaving many debtors with a lack of liquidity and few options other than a sale in Chapter 11— "free and clear of liens, claims and encumbrances" under §363 of the Bankruptcy Code. More recently, as the financial markets have begun to improve, debtors have been able to obtain post-petition financing; however, the terms have largely dictated the debtors' bankruptcy exit strategy and the use of 363 sales in Chapter 11 have continued to rise.

Historically, 363 sales in Chapter 11 would occur 90 to 120 days after filing. In recent years, however, the 363 sale timeline has been significantly truncated. The speed of the 363 sale process is largely attributable to aggressive lenders, deteriorating value, short post-petition loan terms to maturity and the desire for reduced administrative costs to closing. Additionally, the enactment of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-8, 119 Stat. 23, enacted April 20, 2005) (BAPCPA) aided in the compression of Chapter 11 time frames, generally. Specifically, the changes implemented to the key time frames and timelines for assumption or rejection of real estate leases as well as the limitations imposed on exclusivity periods have led to the need for an expedited decision-making process in the first several weeks of a case. 11 U.S.C. §§365(d)(4) & 1121(c). The creation of administrative priority status for vendor claims tied to goods sold within the 20 days prior to the bankruptcy filing under BAPCPA also had a tremendous influence on the ability of a company to survive and this additional administrative burden has caused many debtors to fail. 11 U.S.C. §503(b)(9). These amendments, along with the desire to reduce administrative costs in bankruptcy and achieve a quick closing and/or consummation of a plan of reorganization, have condensed the average time frame for Chapter 11 cases.2

Many of the recent Chapter 11 filings in which the debtor sought an expedited sale process are in the retail industry. For example, retailers such as Loehmanns, Love Culture, Dots, Radio Shack and Coldwater Creek each obtained relief under §363 of the Bankruptcy Code between 22 and 55 days of filing.3 According to a recent study by AlixPartners advisory firm, 55 percent of all U.S. retailers that have filed for bankruptcy over the past 10 years have ended up in liquidation.4 The conclusion ultimately reached is that, unlike other industries where 363 sales occur in less than one in 20 debtors, 363 sales in the retail sector occur much more frequently. The root cause was attributed in large part to the BAPCPA changes noted above, the "short runway" for retail sales and the liquid nature of the inventory.5

Critics of fast track 363 sales and proponents for change to the Bankruptcy Code argue that the process is too fast, due process rights of parties in interest are being compromised, and the sale process often begins and ends before parties in interest have had an opportunity to be fully informed and weigh in on the process. Additionally, these sales often determine the ultimate distributions to creditors, sidestep the plan process, and deprive creditors of their statutory right under §1129 of the Bankruptcy Code to vote (thereby eliminating the fair and equitable standard). Allowing parties in interest to slow down a fast track 363 sale process for reasons, such as inadequate marketing or a sale that will only benefit the senior secured creditor group, makes good sense. It appears that even some bankruptcy judges are rethinking these expedited sale processes which have largely been approved to date. For example, the debtors in the Digital Domain Media Group bankruptcy sold their significant assets just 11 days after the petition date.6 Although Judge Brendan Shannon allowed the highly expedited sale process and approved the resulting sale of the debtors' assets, at the hearing approving the sale, Shannon emphasized that he regretted allowing the sale process to proceed so quickly and cautioned that neither he nor his colleagues in the Delaware Bankruptcy Court would likely allow such a process to occur in the future.7

These concerns surrounding the use of fast track 363 sales were set forth in great detail in the ABI Commission Report.8 The ABI Commission advocates for a new §363 entitled "363x" which would require a presumptive 60 day moratorium on sales (with some exceptions reverting back to the traditional Lionel standard). This presumption may be overcome by a showing by clear and convincing evidence that a quicker process (i.e., in the first 60 days of a case) is justified. The Commission further proposes that some—but not all—of the confirmation standards be incorporated in §363 (which, if enacted, may effectively make 363 its own chapter of title 11 for expedited sales outside a plan). One such requirement proposed would be to require that sale proceeds be reserved to satisfy all priority claims in full. The ABI Commission's proposal—if enacted into law—would curtail the use of structured dismissals after a sale and in lieu of plan confirmation. Structured dismissals are frequently approved by some courts in cases where the cost of doing a plan of liquidation cannot be justified.9 In these cases there are provisions made for distributions to other creditor classes to balance the impact.10

In a recent report issued in October 2015 by the Loan Syndications and Trading Associations (LSTA), the LSTA responds to the ABI Commission Report.11 The LSTA disagrees generally that reform of Chapter 11 is needed or appropriate and suggests that many of the proposals contained in the ABI Commission Report could have a potential harmful effect on the economy and financial markets. As to the proposed reform of 363 sales, the LSTA argues that the proposed 60-day moratorium on 363 sales could be affirmatively harmful to some debtors noting that "[l]engthening the time spent in bankruptcy before completing a sale will increase administrative expenses, including both the business's operating costs (and the costs of any related DIP financing) and the costs of the bankruptcy process itself, including the professional fees of the debtor and other parties in interest."12 The LSTA also objects to the ABI Commission's proposed requirement that the debtor withhold sufficient proceeds from the sale to pay all administrative claims in full. Because typically a secured lender advocating a sale will negotiate with the debtor a carve-out from its collateral to pay the necessary and reasonable costs of the Chapter 11 sale process, the LSTA argues that the ABI Commission's proposal will remove the secured lender's choice and will give debtors a "blank check" to underwrite the cost of the process. This, like many of the proposals in the ABI Commission Report, the LSTA posits would adjust the lender's bargained for contractual rights and remedies entered into prior to the bankruptcy.

Most bankruptcy practitioners want to maintain the ability to formulate creative solutions for a company in financial and/or operational distress. While the recommendations of the ABI Commission Report seek to appropriately balance the rights of lenders with the rights of debtors in a Chapter 11 case, many of the recommendations upend secured creditors' bargained for rights and any room for debtor creativity. A "one size fits all" formulaic approach to 363 sales will not work. It cannot be disputed that a thorough marketing effort and adequate notice to parties in interest to evaluate the proposed transaction makes good sense and strikes a good compromise. To amend the Bankruptcy Code to dictate how a sale process should be run, or provide for involuntary and indeterminate carve-outs from a secured party's liens, appears far from striking a balance and contravenes a creditor's bargained for state law rights and remedies.

Whether or how Congress will address the proposals for the reform of Chapter 11 remains unclear. For now, however, given the continued rise in 363 sales (now in the retail sector), the concerns identified in the ABI Commission Report and the LSTA Response should be incorporated into the Chapter 11 advocacy process. Consideration of these concerns by courts may result in a more balanced approach to the "fire drills" imposed by these kinds of filings and expedited sales, and may more adequately address unsecured creditors' legitimate due process concerns and secured parties' contractual expectations.


1. The Bankruptcy Act of 1898 did not include any provision for an expedited sale, but instead overtime case law allowed for such sales to take place primarily where the assets were perishable or subject to rapid deterioration in value. See In re Pedlow, 209 F. 841, 842 (2d Cir. 1913). In 1978 with the enactment of the Bankruptcy Code, §363 was created but did not include any perishability or deterioration standard—in fact there was not even a requirement for cause to be shown to utilize the section. The current standard for approval of 363 sales was established in the landmark case of Comm. of Equity Security Holders v. Lionel Corp. (In re Lionel), 722 F.2d 1063 (2d Cir. 1983). In the past 25 years "since Lionel, asset sales under §363 of the Bankruptcy Code have become the preferred method of monetizing the assets of the debtor, company." "The Seven Deadly Sins of §363 Sales," Am. Bank. Inst. J. June 2005, at 22 (citing Ind. State Police Pension Trust v. Chrysler (In re Chrysler), 576 F.3d 108, 115 (2d Cir. 2009)).

2. Landmark examples of expeditious sales are General Motors and Chrysler, each of which involved a 363 sale of substantially all assets that was completed in approximately 41 days. See, e.g., In re Gen. Motors, 407 B.R. 463, 491-92 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2009), aff'd sub nom. In re Motors Liquidation Co., 430 B.R. 65 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); In re Chrysler, 405 B.R. 84, 96 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2009). An example of an even quicker sale is Lehman Brothers. See Lehman Bros. Holdings, Case No. 08-13555 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2008) (sale approved within seven days of Chapter 11 filing); "Section 363 Sales: Mooting Due Process," 29 Emory Bankr. Dev. L.J., Alla Rankin (2012) (although it should be recognized that tremendous public policy concerns existed for this process, so too in Lehman where the sale also occurred within one week).

3. See, e.g., In re Loehmann's Holdings Inc., et al., Case No. 13-14050, [ECF Docket No. 200] (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2014) (sale order entered 23 days from petition date); In re Dots, Case No. 14-11016, [ECF Docket No. 132] (Bankr. D. N.J. Feb. 27, 2014) (sale order entered 38 days from petition date); In re Love Culture, Case No. 14-24508, [ECF Docket No.157] (Bankr. D. N.J. Aug. 7, 2014) (sale order entered 21 days from petition date); In re RadioShack, et al., Case No. 15-10197, [ECF Docket No. 1672] (Bankr. D. Del. April 1, 2015) (sale order entered 55 days from petition date); In re Coldwater Creek, Case No. 14-10867, [ECF Docket No. 439] (Bankr. D. Del. May 22, 2014) (sale order entered 41 days from petition date).

4. Holly Etlin and James Hogarth, ALIX PARTNERS RETAIL BANKRUPTCY STUDY, Insight, October 2015.

5. The downward trend in the retail market looks to continue as Macy's recently announced that it has had a "sluggish fall season" and that it would be going all out with holiday sales. See Hiroko Tabuchi, "Macy's Sounds a Holiday Alarm, and Retailers Brace for Heavy Discounting," N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 12, 2015, at B3. Other retailers' sales are also down significantly and their shares are dropping across the board.

6. See In re Digital Domain Media Group, No. 12-12568 (BLS) (Bankr. D. Del. Sept. 25, 2012) [Docket No. 223].

7. See Jacqueline Palank, "Judge Begrudgingly, Oks' Digital Domain Sale, Bankruptcy Beat," THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, Sept. 24, 2012.

8. See AMERICAN BANKRUPTCY INSTITUTE COMMISSION TO STUDY THE REFORM OF CHAPTER 11, 2012-2014 Final Report and Recommendations (the ABI Commission Report).

9. See, e.g., In re LCI Holding Company, No. 14-2709, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16306 (3d Cir. Sept. 14, 2015) (upholding bankruptcy court order authorizing a sale that would result in significant capital gains tax liability for the estate and which would be left unpaid even though junior unsecured creditors would receive a distribution pursuant to a settlement agreement).

10. The cases tied to gifting and creditor carve-outs will not be addressed herein.

11. See The Trouble with Unneeded Bankruptcy Reform: The LSTA's Response to the ABI Chapter 11 Commission Report, October 2015.

12. See id. at p.51.

Previously published in the New York Law Journal, December 8, 2015

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Leslie Berkoff
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.