United States: Recap Of "Rethinking Art Authentication" At The New York City Bar

Last Updated: December 10 2015
Article by Nicholas M. O'Donnell

Last week the Art Law Committee of the New York City Bar Association hosted a terrific two-hour event.  Entitled "Rethinking Art Authentication," the discussion aimed to address a way forward from the problems of fakes, forgeries, and authentication lawsuits that have plagued the art market in recent years.  It was a lively and fascinating evening.

The first notable aspect was the composition of the speakers.  The panel consisted of legal practitioners, scholars, and scientists.  This gave the discussion a balance that is often lacking in legal seminars.  The chair of our committee, Dean Nicyper (Withers Bergman LLP), introduced the panel and gave the floor first to Colette Loll, president of Art Fraud Insights, LLC.  Ms. Loll addressed conditions and patterns faced by artists foundations in particular.  The process of authentication needs a paradigm shift, she suggested.  Questions are met with fear and hostility, including whether works sent out of the country may be seized.  The market suffers from all this.  In addition, opinions change over time, and foundations are besieged with requests and threats of lawsuits.

Catalogues raisonée are a further complication.  They are critical tools for provenance research.  Scholarly process is always subject to error, however, and may not even be intended as comprehensive.  The 1958 Ceroni catalogue raisonnée of Amadeo Modigliani is a perfect example: it only included works he saw and he never traveled to the United States.  Gerhard Richter's recent disavowal of his recent work is another example, creating an odd category in the market.

Recent forgery scandals reveal the limitations of technological advances.  The market continues to be vulnerable, exemplified by Knoedler and Beltracchi case.  Beltracchi was savvy about using historical techniques and sources (he posed his wife in a staged "historical" photograph).  Science ultimately caught up with him because he used a titanium white pigment that was anachronistic for the painting in which it was used, but it is still not known how many works he created.  The fictitious Dada artist "Karl Waldmann" scandal is another recent example.  The market's desire to discover lost artists can blind it to proper scrutiny.

Lastly, global online art sales create another vulnerability point.  A level of acceptable documentation is not commonly recognized.

Jennifer L. Mass, Senior Scientist and Director, Scientific Research and Analysis Laboratory, Winterthur Museum and President, Scientific Analysis of Fine Art, LLC, spoke next.  Dr. Mass said she wanted to give a snapshot of the "arms race" of authenticity issues.  She distinguished between bad fakes, good fakes, and excellent fakes.  A good fake is something made with the intent to deceive, for example, the recent claim that La Bella Principessa by Leonardo da Vinci is a super market check out girl from the 1970s made using period materials.  An excellent fake was exemplified by a Chinese porcelain example that used the right kinds of clay and overglaze from an earlier period.

To combat his, scientists like Dr. Mass check the iron composition of clay and compare it to the likelihood that someone had used the exact same source as a more recent source.  Dr. Mass then showed an example of a supposed 19th century clock from Vermont.  "Just really look" she exhorted the audience—this clock's pristine condition belied its supposed age.  To corroborate that impression, a high energy X-ray was used to identify elements in the periodic table.  Titanium paint—not available until the 20th century—was revealed, confirming it as a fake.  If it is too good to be true, she suggested, it probably is.  A harder example involved distinguishing between kinds of titanium white, which became available roughly 20 years apart.  Hyperspectral imaging makes it much easier to understand what exactly the viewer is seeing.  Even for undisputed authentic works, the condition can be informed by looking beneath the surface, which may reveal conservation if not forgery  Reverse engineering paints from known works allows scientists to stay ahead of forgers as well.

Dr. Mass used Picasso's Blue Room as an example of new technology.  Infrared showed a portrait underneath that would not have been visible 50 years ago.  Multispectral analysis showed further the ability to identify the sitter to distinguish whether it was a self-portrait or a friend.

Are fakes and forgeries getting better?  Yes, said Dr. Mass, but so are techniques to combat them, she suggested.  She and Ms. Loll are currently working on analyzing known forger Elmyr de Hory's palette to try to identify other forgeries.

Rick Johnson, Jacobs' Fellow in Computational Arts and Humanities, Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute, Cornell Tech (New York City), was next on the panel.  Dr. Johnson addressed his use of technical algorithms.  He also discussed some of his own experience in scientific analysis.

Professor Amy Adler of New York University addressed a very different and provocative question than the first three speakers.  Specifically, Professor Adler questioned whether the focus on identifying unique originals was in fact worth all the trouble it causes.

She pointed to recent cases where no connoisseur or scholar could state definitively what the work is, which challenges our assumptions about authenticity.  Notions of authenticity are under assault by contemporary artists.

First, Professor Adler identified what she called "fake by fiat."  Artist Cady Noland sometimes questions her own previous work.  Cowboys Milking was to be auctioned, and she didn't like what she saw.  Noland disclaimed the work by objecting to some conservation.  The Visual Artists Rights Act question never had to be answered by the court, but why does the art market care so much about the artist's imprimatur?  Why should the artist have the power to disavow a work she clearly made and reduce its value to zero?

Ever since Duchamp transformed objects merely by calling them art (also recalling a Rauschenberg telegram that says "this is a portrait because I say so"), if an artist has the power to turn a lowly object into a work of art, the corollary is that she can turn a work of art into a lowly object.

Conceptual work and certificates is one way that the art market has tried to manage this problem.  But there has been litigation over refusals to reissue certificates, without which a Dan Flavin work is just a light bulb.  A more recent Flavin controversy involving "posthumous" works are not real Flavins because although he had imagined them, they were not done before he died.

To take another example: the Warhol anti-trust litigation involved multiple silk screen series, one of which the Warhol board considered authentic, one it did not.  The latter involved an outside printer.  Yet, as Professor Adler noted, correspondence from Warhol exists where he talks about a variety of people actually printing works even within his Factory ("ask my assistant, he did most of my paintings")—works the Foundation considers authentic.  Professor Adler suggests that the very question that the lawsuit posed is one that Warhol's work renders a little bit absurd.

Recalling Plato, she asked: given two objects that look exactly alike, how is one a work of art and one not?  Why is one worth $100 million and one is valueless because of these determinations?  Taking the absurdity a step further, Professor Adler showed a work imitating Warhol that the artist sent to the Foundation specifically to obtain a rejected stamp.  All of this harkens back to Walter Benjamin's seminal essay "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction."

"Exhibition copies"—copies created for a show while the original is taken down elsewhere question what Professor Adler called the "fetishization" of the original or, as she ended with: "Maybe a little bit real and a little bit fake, maybe a 'little bit pregnant'."

Lastly, Mr. Nicyper discussed the pending authentication bill before the New York legislature, the various iterations of which we have addressed before here.  Most importantly, Mr. Nicyper explained the course of this year's changes to the bill, its fate, and its prospects for the future.

Drafted with the impetus of the Art Law Committee, the original bill proposed two years ago would have made a number of changes, including requiring heightened pleading against authenticators, a clear and convincing evidence burden of proof, and a one-way fee shifting attorneys' fees provision.  That bill was opposed by the Trial Lawyers Association.  This year, a revised bill was introduced that did away with the clear and convincing evidence standard.  That bill passed the New York Senate, but no action was taken in the Assembly.  According to Mr. Nicyper, certain lawmakers were opposed and prevented it coming to a vote.

Those lawmakers are no longer in the Assembly, however, according to Mr. Nicyper.  Thus, the chances for passage in the next session actually look promising.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Nicholas M. O'Donnell
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.