United States: Drafters Beware: Does Your Specification Enable The Prior Art?

Shortly before Halloween, the Federal Circuit gave patent drafters a (modest) scare.  At issue in In re Morsa, No. 2015-1107 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2015), was whether a prior art reference was enabled.  The Federal Circuit agreed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that it was enabled, but its reasoning was supported primarily by statements in the applicant's own specification.  With Halloween now behind us, practitioners should bear the case in mind when drafting applications, but the case is not a horror story.

Morsa involved a patent application directed to managing "benefits," which were described in the specification as "things of value" given away to target entities.  The claims at issue generally involved receiving a benefit information request from a user, searching a benefit information database for benefits matching the request, and returning benefit information to the user.  The claims involved various computer components, such as a "physical memory device" and a "computer compatible network."

In an earlier appeal to the Federal Circuit, the applicant challenged the rejection of certain claims based on a prior art reference titled "Peter Martin Associates Press Release" or "PMA."  Specifically, the applicant argued that its invention antedated PMA and that PMA was not enabled.  The applicant also challenged PMA's teachings on the merits.  Regarding enablement, the Federal Circuit found that, while prior art applied by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) is generally presumed to be enabled, an applicant may overcome that presumption such that the Board must present evidence of enablement.   In re Morsa, 713 F.3d 104, 110 (Fed. Cir. 2013).  Because in this case the applicant rebutted the presumption and the Board did not substantively respond, the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded with respect to the affected claims. Id. at 110-11.

On remand, the Board found that PMA was enabled.  According to the Board, only "ordinary" computer programming skills were needed to make and use the claimed invention.  The Board's conclusion was based principally on the applicant's specification, which described what knowledge of computer programming a person of ordinary skill would possess.  According to the Board, the disclosure of PMA combined with that knowledge rendered PMA enabling with respect to the claims at issue.

The applicant once again appealed the Board's rejections.  On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed, finding that PMA was properly deemed to be enabled by the Board.  As the Federal Circuit noted, enablement generally requires that a "reference teach a skilled artisan—at the time of filing—to make or carry out what it discloses in relation to the claimed invention without undue experimentation."  Morsa, No. 2015-1107, slip op. at 4.  The court further commented that, "[f]or a prior-art reference to be enabling, it need not enable the claim in its entirety, but instead the reference need only enable a single embodiment of the claim."  Id.  In this case, the Federal Circuit agreed that the application at issue contained several admissions regarding what a person of ordinary skill in the art would have known, including that central processing units and memories were "well known" and could be used for processing requests for benefit information.  Further, the specification admitted that its disclosure could be "implemented by any programmer of ordinary skill in the art using commercially available development tools." Id. (citation omitted).  Primarily due to these admissions, the Federal Circuit agreed with the Board that PMA was enabling vis-à-vis the challenged claims, since only "ordinary" computer programming skills were needed to bridge the gaps between the reference and the claims.

The applicant also argued on appeal that the USPTO improperly made new grounds of rejection.  According to the applicant, the USPTO commented that "database-searching is old and well known and thus the focus on the present application is not on searching databases generally, but on the specific type of data used and the specific searches performed," and these comments formed the basis for new grounds of rejection. Id. at 5.  The Federal Circuit again disagreed, finding that the Board's statements were "merely descriptive" and not part of the USPTO's enablement analysis. Id. at 5-6.

The Federal Circuit also made short shrift of the applicant's argument that PMA would have required "undue experimentation" to implement.  As the Federal Circuit explained, the statements in the application itself demonstrated what knowledge a person of ordinary skill in the art would have possessed, and in view of that knowledge, "only ordinary experimentation would be needed to make the claimed program." Id. at 6.  The court further clarified that it was not using the specification's statements as prior art, but was instead assessing the knowledge that a person of ordinary skill would possess based on those statements.  According to the court, "[t]here is a crucial difference between using the patent's specification for filling in gaps in the prior art, and using it to determine the knowledge of a person of ordinary skill in the art." Id.

Judge Newman issued a dissent, criticizing the majority opinion for confusing issues of anticipation and obviousness, as well as the application of the enablement requirement.  According to Judge Newman, there were undisputed "gaps" between the claim limitations and PMA, which could not be filled by the "knowledge" possessed by a person of ordinary skill or any official notice taken by the USPTO.  She explained that enablement of a prior art reference must come from the reference itself, not from the applicant's specification.

Morsa's application of the enablement requirement for prior art warrants attention by practitioners.  When drafting an application, practitioners inevitably make decisions about the level of detail to include.  Judge Rich's adage that "a patent need not teach, and preferably omits, what is well known in the art," provides some guidance. Hybritech Inc. v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc., 802 F.2d 1367, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 1986).  Consistent with this principle, practitioners often omit features from patent applications that are deemed too commonplace or too granular when compared to the claimed invention.  Thus, for a patent claim directed to mobile device software, the application need not describe the semiconductor composition of the microprocessor in the mobile device.  Morsa, however, highlights one limitation to the practice of omitting well-known features in a patent application.  In Morsa, an applicant's own statements in its specification about computer programming being "well known" served as admissions that rendered a prior art reference enabling.  Nevertheless, Morsa does not require practitioners to follow an extreme approach of either (1) including all imaginable detail in an application or (2) omitting all acknowledgements of basic prior art teachings.  Adept practitioners should instead recognize that there is a tradeoff: applications need not be encyclopedias of the relevant field of invention, but any inventive concepts not described cannot be claimed.  Practitioners should thus ensure that they fully understand and robustly describe an invention in an application.  Only when this is done can practitioners also decide what material to omit from an application.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
23 Sep 2018, Seminar, Chicago, United States

Finnegan is a sponsor of the Intellectual Property Owners Association Annual Meeting, supporting the Women in IP Networking Brunch.

26 Sep 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

This latest series of webinars will explore emerging trends in the changing intellectual property (IP) legal environment in Europe and the United States.

26 Sep 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

This latest series of webinars will explore emerging trends in the changing intellectual property (IP) legal environment in Europe and the United States.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Foley & Lardner
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Foley & Lardner
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions