United States: 2015 Revisions To The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Are Now In Effect: 5 Key Practice Pointers To Meeting The New Requirements

New amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Rules") became effective on December 1st. Are you ready? Details about the revised Rules, including the text of the Rules, redlines, and detailed comments are available here (and we will post additional information on each key provision in the coming weeks). The focus of this advisory is answering one simple question: how will these changes impact the way you handle discovery? To comply with the spirit and the letter of these rule changes, you may need to make some adjustments to your discovery practice.

The revised Rules emphasize case management and proactive discovery by adding several mechanisms to front-load discovery decisions and emphasize proportionality in the discovery process. They also provide guidance for when sanctions for failure to preserve electronically stored information ("ESI") are appropriate. How courts will apply these Rules is subject to debate, but if you adhere to the five practice pointers below, you should be in good shape to avoid sanctions, reduce risks, and get to the merits of your case without a discovery sideshow.

#1: Add New Players to Your Roster: Consult with Appropriate eDiscovery Professionals

The single most effective thing you can do to ensure you comply with the new Rules and manage the discovery process efficiently is to engage or involve appropriate resources including lawyers with an understanding of the revised Rules, old rules, relevant case law and the practical intersection of these rules and laws with ever-evolving technology. The complexity of this space has created an entire industry of professionals, both legal and technical, who focus on staying current on the law and technology and who have practical daily experience. Such professionals can help reduce risks and decrease costs by assisting with the other items identified below.

#2: Develop and Implement a Reasonable Preservation Plan

One of the key motivators behind this round of changes to the Rules was to provide a more uniform approach to when courts should impose the most severe spoliation sanctions for failure to preserve relevant ESI. The changes to Rule 37 provide that if ESI that should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation is lost "because a party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve it, and the ESI cannot be restored or replaced through additional discovery" the court may employ different remedial measures and sanctions depending on the nature of the loss. Under revised Rule 37, the most severe sanctions are limited to cases where a party acted with the intent to deprive another party of the information's use in the litigation ( Rule 37(e)(2)).

Spoliation battles will require an analysis into the preservation steps taken and the reason for any loss of relevant information that prejudices the requesting party. A reasonable preservation plan to protect against sanctions requires considering the facts of each case and understanding the scope and nature of potentially relevant data sources. You cannot preserve what you do not know exists. Make sure you involve appropriate personnel (IT, key custodians, outside counsel, in-house counsel, service providers, etc.) in the discussion to identify relevant systems and practices.

Document your decisions by noting when the various aspects of the preservation plan are implemented and by whom: distributing and tracking the legal hold notice; collecting data for preservation (if required); disabling auto-delete or over-writing of specific systems (if applicable); suspending processes for deletion of ESI from departing employees subject to the hold; etc. If preservation is later questioned, it will likely be months or years later. If you fail to document the process, you may have a harder time showing it was reasonable. We will discuss the burden of proof issues in such battles in a future post.

#3 Throw Away Your Templates for Rule 34 Requests

The Federal Rules, and some of the courts applying them, have tried for years to warn against overly broad document requests and encourage proportionality in the process. But the ever-increasing volume of data and corresponding increased costs to preserve, collect, filter, analyze, and produce relevant information in litigation prompted a renewed emphasis on proportionality in the scope of discovery in the revised Rules.

As revised, Rule 26(b)(1) moves proportionality considerations front and center and allows a party to "obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the parties' relative access to relevant information, the parties' resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit."

Ensuring that discovery requests are not overly broad and are proportional to the specific issues in the case requires understanding the nature of the specific claims and defenses and looking hard at each Rule 34 request to decide when you really need "any and all documents" related to a topic and when "documents sufficient to show" a specific fact or issue will meet your needs. Proportionality also requires thinking about the most efficient way to get the information sought based on its significance to the overall matter. The most efficient discovery tool may be a request to admit, a stipulation, an interrogatory or a deposition rather than a broad document request to search through emails and ESI. Proportionality may also require phasing discovery and using categorical privilege logs or other creative case-specific solutions.

#4 Throw Away Your Templates for Rule 34 Objections

Similarly, responding parties can no longer serve blanket objections without specifying what they actually plan to produce/withhold and by when.

An objection to a Rule 34 request must state: (1) "with specificity the grounds for objecting" to the request, including the reasons; and (2) whether anything is being withheld on the basis of the objection. An objection that states the limits that have controlled the search for responsive and relevant materials (e.g., temporal or source limitations) qualifies as a statement that materials have been "withheld." To make specific objections related to proportionality, counsel will need to engage in early discussions with clients (and opposing parties) regarding potential sources of information (custodians, systems, devices, etc.) and the scope of discovery, including relevant date ranges, topics, and the identification of sources that may be inaccessible due to undue cost or other burdens.

Under the amendments, if a party elects to produce copies of documents or ESI, instead of permitting an inspection, the production must be completed no later than the time for inspection specified in the request or another reasonable time specifically identified in the response. When it is necessary to make the production in stages, the response should specify the beginning and end dates of the production.

Throw away those form responses that simply state that you object to requests as overly broad and burdensome, but will produce responsive documents that are not objectionable or privileged, if they exist . . . at some point in the future. Providing beginning and end dates for productions will require actual knowledge of the universe of potential production documents – including the volume that remains after ESI is collected, de-duplicated, processed, filtered, reviewed, and converted to the agreed-upon production format. Timelines must also factor in the time necessary to complete each phase of the document production process.

Practitioners must understand their clients' information systems and data with sufficient detail to develop a plan for collection and production within a specific time frame in a response to Rule 34 requests. In complex matters with diverse ranges of potentially relevant sources, planning for these issues will need to begin before discovery requests are served to allow sufficient time to gather the required details and data (see below).

#5: Collect Data Before Document Requests Are Served

The revised Rules intentionally speed up the discovery process by reducing the time limit for service of process in Rule 4(m); allowing early service of Rule 34 discovery requests before the Rule 26 meet and confer process; and requiring parties to provide the estimated timing of rolling productions (see above). Prior efforts to inspire early discussion and management of discovery issues fell short and the Rules now reflect aggressive timelines that will be challenging to meet without early and proactive discovery management.

Complying with the revised Rules requirements to provide specific information regarding objections as well as timing of productions will require collecting at least some documents and data before you even receive discovery requests and before you serve your responses and objections. Having data in hand allows you to test search terms, analyze volume, and have a more realistic idea of how much time it will take to filter, review, analyze, and produce relevant information.

Early data collection also will help you understand the facts of your case, support proportionality arguments, and comply with your duties under Rules 1 and 26(g).Waiting until the clock starts ticking for a response to start the discovery process will not leave you enough time to gain a sufficient and accurate understanding of the scope of ESI at issue to meet the requirements of the revised Rules.

Finally, Federal Rule 1 provides that the scope and purpose of the Federal Rules are to secure the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding." The amendments clarify that Rule 1 should be construed, administered "and employed by the court and the parties" to achieve these goals. Revised Rule 1 is not intended to "invite ill-founded attempts to seek sanctions for violating a duty to cooperate," but the duty to cooperate to ensure the case is efficiently resolved overlays all of the revised Rules and obligations and requires counsel to proactively manage discovery.

The emphasis on case management and proportionality will require practitioners to address eDiscovery issues early and proactively. Pushing back discussions and decisions regarding substantive discovery issues (with both clients and adversaries) or delaying the collection and analysis of potential document and data sources will put counsel (and their clients) at risk of violating their duties under the Rules.

The most common errors and issues in the eDiscovery space arise from failures to understand technical issues and to manage the discovery process proactively and efficiently. Hopefully, these amendments will improve the emphasis placed on discovery planning and management. We shall see.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.