United States: Digital Models: Federal Circuit Rejects ITC Jurisdiction Over Electronic Transmissions

Last Updated: December 4 2015
Article by Kirk A. Sigmon, G. Brian Busey and Lynn I. Levine

On November 10, 2015, the Federal Circuit released its opinion in ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. International Trade Commission reversing the International Trade Commission's (the ITC or the "Commission") determination that electronic transmissions could be infringing "articles" within the ITC's jurisdiction. In a divided panel, Chief Judge Prost, writing for the majority, limited "articles" in 19 U.S.C. § 1337 ("Section 337") to "material things." The Federal Circuit's ruling thus prevents the ITC from issuing remedy orders against infringing products that are digitally transmitted, potentially limiting the ITC's jurisdiction in protecting intellectual property rights at a time when digital commerce is growing in importance.


The decision in ClearCorrect v. International Trade Commission resulted from an appeal of the ITC's final determination In the Matter of Certain Digital Models, Digital Data, and Treatment Plans for Use in Making Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances, the Appliances Made Therefrom, and Methods of Making the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-833 ("Digital Models").

In Digital Models, the complainant, a manufacturer of dental repositioning appliances, asserted that respondents ClearCorrect Pakistan and ClearCorrect Operating, LLC (collectively "ClearCorrect") were unlawfully importing – via the Internet – data used to create infringing dental repositioning appliances.  In brief, ClearCorrect would receive orthodontic measurements from dentists in the United States, process those measurements in Pakistan to produce 3D-printable models of dental repositioning appliances, and then electronically transmit those infringing models to the United States for 3D printing.

In Digital Models, the Commission had held that electronically transmitted information was an article under Section 337.  Section 337 prohibits "[t]he importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation by the owner, importer, or consignee, of articles that . . . infringe a valid and enforceable United States patent."  19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(B) (emphasis added).  While the Commission had over a decade ago – in Certain Hardware Logic Emulation Systems and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-383 (1998)  – concluded its jurisdiction extended to electronic transmissions as articles, it revisited the issue in Digital Models and ultimately reiterated that it had jurisdiction over electronic transmissions.  (Our article on that decision and the accompanying client alert is available here.)  One ITC Commissioner, Johanson, dissented from the ITC's decision.

ClearCorrect was argued on August 11, 2015.  (Our article on the oral arguments is available here.)

The Federal Circuit's Ruling

In the opinion by Chief Judge Prost, the Federal Circuit reversed the Commission's decision and held that the term "articles" refers only to "material things."  The Federal Circuit thus concluded that the ITC does not have jurisdiction over transmissions of electronic data.

The Court conducted a two-step Chevron analysis of the Commission's definition of "articles."

First, the Court considered whether the term "articles" was ambiguous.  It ruled that, "when viewed in context and with an eye towards the statutory scheme," the literal text of Section 337 defined "articles" as "material things."  Though Section 337 does not define the term "articles," the Court noted that contemporaneous and modern dictionaries limited "articles" to "material thing[s]" and that the United States Tariff Commission's (the predecessor to the ITCs) own contemporaneous definition of "articles" also defined "articles" as, generally, physical "commodities."  For statutory context, the Court also examined the use of "articles" in different parts of Section 337, noting that the use of the term "articles" in the forfeiture provisions of Section 337 implied that "articles" was limited to goods that could be physically "forfeited" and/or "seized."  The Court also examined Section 337 and the legislative history of the statute in its entirety, concluding again that the term "articles" was limited to "material things."

Turning to step two of the Chevron analysis, although the Court determined Congress's intent was "unambiguous," the Court determined that "the Commission's interpretation of the term 'articles' was unreasonable" and thus did not warrant deference.1  The Court criticized the Commission's analysis of the plain meaning of "articles," its analysis of legislative history, and its reliance on Congressional debates.  The Court concluded:

It is not simply a question of the Commission having the choice between two 'right' definitions, but instead it represents a systematic pattern of the Commission picking the wrong conclusion from the evidence. Here the Commission has not offered a reasoned explanation for its definition of 'articles' and thus is owed no deference.2

In her opinion, Chief Judge Prost also noted her agreement with Commissioner David Johanson's dissent in the Commission's Digital Models decision.  For example, Chief Judge Prost concurred with Commissioner Johanson's view that it made no sense for "articles" to encompass digital transmissions because exclusion orders against such transmissions were not enforceable.

In conclusion, the Court emphasized that it would leave to Congress "the task of expanding the statute" to include electronic transmissions if Congress so desired.3

Judge O'Malley's Concurrence

In a concurrence, Judge O'Malley further criticized the Commission's decision, arguing that Chevron deference to the Commission's decision was unnecessary.  Judge O'Malley noted that the Commission defined "articles" to include "electronic transmissions" despite "never having purported to regulate Internet transmissions in the past, despite no reference to data transmissions in the statute under which it acts, and despite an absence of expertise in the agency in dealing with such transmissions." 4  In essence, Judge O'Malley argued that, "[i]f Congress intended for the Commission to regulate one of the most important aspects of modern-day life – the Internet – Congress surely would have said so expressly."5

Judge Newman's Dissent

In her dissent, Judge Newman argued that the Court's ruling effectively eviscerated the statutory purpose of Section 337: facilitating a remedy against unfair competition.6  Judge Newman characterized the Court's ruling as one that limited Section 337 "to the kinds of technology that existed in 1922 or 1930."7  According to Judge Newman, "[n]o dictionary, and no statutory constraint, limits 'articles' to items that are grossly 'tangible,'"8 and the Commission's ruling thereby warranted Chevron deference.

Judge Newman's dissent criticized many of the bases relied on by the majority.  First, Judge Newman explained that both Commission and Federal Circuit cases supported an expansive reading of "articles," emphasizing a legal trend of reading statutory language "in light of . . . drastic technological change."9  Next, Judge Newman argued that the Commission's interpretation of Section 337 was correct and that the broad definition of the term "article" in the statute was consistent with the purpose of a "remedial" statute to reach all unfair practices.

Judge Newman also criticized the practical implications of the majority's ruling, noting that – as a result of the ruling – the Commission may now stop importation of a CD-ROM but not the exact same data contained on the CD-ROM if transmitted into the U.S. electronically.  "My colleagues' reliance on possible difficulty of enforcement against electronic transmission of infringing digital data and related articles . . . merely adds imprecision to judicial guidance in this commercially important area."10

Potential Ramifications

The Federal Circuit's holding significantly limits the Commission's jurisdiction to address the increasing amount of international commerce conducted via electronic transmissions.  Because the Commission is – under the Federal Circuit's decision – prevented from issuing remedial orders against electronic transmissions, importers of infringing goods could attempt to circumvent ITC jurisdiction by using the Internet, satellites, or other methods of electronic transmission to distribute infringing digital data.  For example, importers may elect to digitally import the necessary digital data for a product and then subsequently physically manufacture infringing goods in the U.S. to prevent Customs and ITC enforcement of intellectual property rights.  Owners of patents that may be infringed by the use of digital data may need to explore potential alternative means to protect their rights domestically.

It is not yet clear whether the ITC or any of the parties will seek rehearing or rehearing en banc, although, in light of the importance of the decision and the divided panel, there appears to be more than a possibility of further review.


1. ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, No. 2014-1527, at *31 (Nov. 10, 2015).

2. Id. at *35.

3. Id. (citing Bayer AG v. Housey Pharm., Inc., 340 F.3d 1367, 1376-77 (Fed. Cir. 2003)).

4. Id. at *2 (O'Malley, J. concurring).

5. Id.

6. Id. (Newman, J., dissenting) at *2.

7. Id. (Newman, J., dissenting) at *6.

8. Id. at *10 (Newman, J., dissenting).

9. ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, No. 2014-1527, at *6-7 (Nov. 10, 2015) (Newman, J. dissenting) (citing Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc., 392 U.S. 390, 395-96 (1968).

10. Id. at *15 (Newman, J., dissenting).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Kirk A. Sigmon
G. Brian Busey
Lynn I. Levine
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions