United States: CFPB Announces Intent To Commence Arbitration Rulemaking

On October 7, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced that it is considering two rulemaking proposals that would severely limit the use of pre-dispute arbitration clauses in consumer financial service contacts. Ignoring the well-documented problems and abuses associated with class action litigation, the Bureau has concluded that because class actions effect a greater aggregate transfer of wealth from alleged "wrongdoers" to plaintiffs' class action lawyers and plaintiff classes than does arbitration, it is in the public interest and for the benefit of consumers to eliminate arbitration clauses that would limit its use. The Bureau has also concluded, as it must under the Dodd-Frank Act, that imposing such limitations by regulation would be consistent with its recent Report to Congress.


The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) mandated a CFPB study on the use of pre-dispute arbitration clauses in consumer financial products and services, with a report of its findings sent to Congress.

The Dodd-Frank Act further authorized the CFPB to prohibit or impose conditions or limitations on the use of arbitration clauses by regulation if the CFPB determined that it would be in the public interest and for the protection of consumers to do so. However, any such regulation must be consistent with the findings of the CFPB's study.

The CFPB commenced its process in 2012, and from the beginning, it has appeared that the CFPB would target arbitration clauses requiring individual arbitration. The Supreme Court held that state laws barring these agreements were preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011). On March 10, 2015, the CFPB released its Final Report to Congress which removed all doubt. As we wrote in our Client Alert at the time, the "Report's conclusion, and Director Richard Cordray's remarks, were as expected: consumers are better served by litigation—and particularly, class action litigation—than by agreements to arbitrate disputes."1 On March 10, 2015, the CFPB released its Final Report to Congress which removed all doubt.

The CFPB's October 7 announcement of the planned rulemaking seeks to implement this conclusion.


The Bureau announced that it is considering two proposals. First, the Bureau proposes to require an arbitration provision "to say explicitly that it does not apply to cases brought on behalf of a class unless and until the class certification is denied by the court or the class claims are dismissed in court." It does this to "prohibit companies from blocking group lawsuits through the use of arbitration clauses in their contracts."

The Bureau's first proposal is based on its view that its Report to Congress shows that class litigation, unlike current arbitration practices, is in the "public interest" and will "benefit consumers."

It is hard to understand how the Report could support those conclusions. The Bureau's Report to Congress, like the materials accompanying its proposed regulations, assiduously avoids addressing the hard questions about the true public interest value of the class action litigation. Reasonable people could differ about that value, both in general and in particular cases. The Bureau simply ignores that question. Instead, the Bureau focuses on which approach results in a greater aggregate shift of wealth from financial institutions to plaintiffs' class action lawyers and plaintiff classes. Indeed, the Bureau devotes a lone sentence in its outline to the topic, using the passive voice to note only that "class lawsuits have been subject to significant criticism" but noting that the Bureau "believes" that "consumer are significantly better protected from harm by consumer financial service providers when they are able to aggregate claims." Others, however, believe that there is at least the potential for abuse:

Judge Friendly, who was not given to hyperbole, called settlements induced by a small probability of an immense judgment in a class action "blackmail settlements." Henry J. Friendly, Federal Jurisdiction: A General View 120 (1973). Judicial concern about them is legitimate, not "sociological," as it was derisively termed in In re Sugar Antitrust Litigation, 559 F.2d 481, 483 n. 1 (9th Cir. 1977).

In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., 51 F.3d 1293, 1298-99 (7th Cir. 1995). The CFPB has simply accepted, uncritically, one side of this debate.

Nor does the Bureau's Report seem to support its conclusion that consumers benefit from class litigation any more than they do from individual arbitration. As we explained in our earlier Client Alert, the Bureau's Report does not support the conclusion that consumers are better served by class action litigation than by arbitration. Instead, the Report showed that, while consumers do not much care about dispute resolution provisions, the market offers consumers significant choice as to whether to enter into an agreement with a business that employs arbitration and that many consumers whose consumer financial product agreements include an arbitration clause can pursue their claims in court. It further showed that the arbitration clauses in consumer financial product agreements rarely place limits on a consumers' recovery or require confidentiality with respect to the proceedings, that arbitrations take place in locations convenient to the consumers and that, in general, arbitration is less expensive and speedier than litigation.

Second, the Bureau is considering requiring those entities that continue to use arbitration agreements "to submit initial claim filings and written awards in consumer finance arbitration proceedings to the Bureau through a process the Bureau would expect to establish as part of [its] rulemaking" and is also considering whether "to publish the claims or awards to its website, making them available to the public."

Although the Bureau's first proposal suggests that it will not impose a total ban on arbitration clauses, the second proposal seems designed to do just that by inflicting a reporting obligation on any institution seeking to use it in the limited circumstances in which it would remain "permissible." It is difficult to understand how it is in the "public interest" to burden what is supposed to be a cheap and efficient process with these requirements. Nor were these requirements the subject of the Bureau's Report to Congress, which may mean this proposal is ultra vires.


In its outline of proposals, the CFPB indicated that it would convene a Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) panel. The panel will include representatives from the Bureau, the Small Business Administration and Office of Management and Budget, who will meet with "small entity representatives" (SERs) to obtain feedback on the potential economic impacts of complying with the proposed regulations. It has since been announced that the panel will be convened during the week of October 19, and a list of questions has been published. According to the CFPB, the panel will issue a report within 60 days of convening.

It thus appears that the Bureau will be in a position to issue a proposed rule in early 2016 and finalize such a rule before the end of that year. As the Bureau notes, and as Congress required, any such rules will apply only to arbitration agreements entered into 180 days after the effective date of any final rule. For companies providing consumer financial products whose agreements include arbitration clauses, this prospective application of the rule will mean different customers will be governed by different arbitration terms based on when those customers opened their accounts.


Financial service companies that employ arbitration provisions in their customer agreements will be impacted by the Bureau's proposed rules. Such companies should consider participating in the rulemaking process so that their views can be heard and made part of the administrative record. Such companies should also begin to consider how they will manage what will eventually be two customer populations—those with whom they have an arbitration agreement and those with whom they don't. Providers of consumer financial services products and services that do not currently use arbitration for dispute resolution, may want to consider adding arbitration clauses to their agreements before the application date of any Final Rule.


1 See Client Alert "CFPB Builds Its Case Against Arbitration Clauses" (Dec. 17, 2013).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Troutman Sanders LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Troutman Sanders LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions