United States: Health Hackers: Problems In Applying Traditional Products Liability Theories To Latent Cyber-Vulnerabilities In Medical Devices

Last Updated: October 21 2015
Article by M. Ryder Lee

October is National Cyber Security Awareness Month (yes, that's a thing), so it seems fitting to write about an unprecedented alert recently released by the FDA to health care providers that warned of a medical device's vulnerability to cyber-attack. The subject device was a now-discontinued infusion pump system made by Hospira that was capable of communicating with the health care provider's network. As such – by definition, really – it could be hacked (though evidently with greater ease than usual here). Interestingly, though, the FDA warning read a lot like an FDA response to a verified product defect. Perhaps that makes sense. But should cyber-security vulnerabilities really be treated the same as design defects under traditional products liability law? While government-issued medical-device security standards from FDA and Department of Homeland Security appear inevitable and necessary, cyber-vulnerabilities seem distinguishable from conventional design defects in the medical products liability context for several reasons.

First, regardless of the plaintiff's theory of liability, the entire cause of action against the device manufacturer would be predicated on a targeted intentional tort committed by a third party. In fact, the cyber-attack giving rise to the claim would also constitute a criminal act in most cases. But if not pursued or prosecuted by law enforcement, it is very unlikely that the parties to any litigation arising out of the act will have the resources or sophistication to identify the hacker. From a causation standpoint, then, this unnamed but clearly-at-fault party is the elephant in any jury room.

Second, even if a device has its own firewall, security key or other built-in feature, in theory those measures could all be circumvented by an authenticated user on the health care provider's network. So if a hospital's main network were to be compromised by a hacker masked as a user authorized to access the device, the device's self-contained security apparatuses may be moot anyway. In a defective design suit that followed such an incident, liability would therefore need to be apportioned between: 1) the health care provider under a negligence or malpractice theory for failing to maintain a secure network; 2) the device manufacturer under a strict-liability or negligence theory, and 3) the hacker. That comparative fault schema becomes even more convoluted where the patient's device is communicating to a health care provider via a mobile wireless carrier or via the patient's home network (which may be unsecured altogether).

In addition to these difficult design defect issues, an injured medical device plaintiff will almost certainly throw in a failure-to-warn claim against the manufacturer as well; which begs the related questions of who has that duty to warn of a cyber-vulnerability and how the learned intermediary doctrine factors in as a defense. Most of these devices are not marketed directly to the public. So are the physicians supposed to be the learned intermediaries for relaying this new species of risk? I hope not: I know some superb physicians who can't set up email on their iPhones, much less assess and explain to a patient the potential risk of a cyber-attack on a networked procedure or device. That's just not necessarily in a physician's skill set. I suppose the hospital's IT staff could always visit the patient as the "learned intermediary" to assess the risk and give the option of an air-gapped or offline procedure (if that's even possible) to take some heat off the manufacturer. But regardless of who is deemed competent to give an informed warning here, any given risk analysis is inherently arbitrary and speculative because the occurrence of the adverse event depends entirely on the intentional tort (and, likely, sophistication) of a third-party malicious hacker.

Finally, there is the glaring question of whether the gravity of this particular threat really warrants the magnitude of the response and the cost to the both the public and private sectors. While extra-stringent cyber-security precautions might be practical for patients who require personal security in general (such as high-ranking government officials, dignitaries, or others subject to a specific personal threat), the average patient is generally not a target. And, as a whole, it's probably safe to say that the sick and infirm are not a top-priority population for this kind of terroristic activity. So, other than imposing some basic government-issued standards for user-authentication and firewalls on all networked medical devices, would the benefits of heightened security measures beyond that really justify the costs? Consider this question not only from a common-sense policy standpoint, but from the standpoint of a jury performing a risk-benefit analysis in a traditional design defect claim. Would the state of the art require that every networked device be implemented with hardware-based security measures (e.g., data diodes) as if it were part of a critical infrastructure network like the bulk-power grid or military defense systems? And at what point would the manufacturer's liability be measured in this context? Network and device security standards can evolve quickly; so a device that was perfectly secure at the time of manufacture and that is otherwise still useful in saving lives might be junked because its processor or physical memory can't handle the new firmware update or software security patch. And what if the required update can be installed, but doing so may tax the device's core CPU to the point of potential hardware failure? The point is that the monetary and transactional costs of disproportionately high cyber-security standards for networked medical devices will often outweigh the benefits, especially in light of the slight risk of a targeted attack.

So what's the solution? If traditional design-defect-type responsibility does ultimately rest with the manufacturer under strict liability, then the liability question should begin and end with the manufacturer's compliance with published FDA and DHS security standards at the time of manufacture. Manufacturers might also be required to initially disclose the expected capabilities of the device's hardware to handle any future security software and firmware upgrades that might be required. This limitation on strict products liability makes sense because it encompasses the scope of the manufacturer's control over the device. As for further liability under theories sounding in negligence, the government-published regulations should serve to establish a bright-line standard of care for both manufacturers and defendant health care providers for actions claiming inadequate cyber-security leading to harm. To remain compliant and avoid liability, the manufacturers should only be required to develop and issue software security updates as necessary to meet the minimum published standards (up to the device's maximum capability) and the health care providers would undertake the sole duty of implementing them within a reasonable set period of time. Any higher (or murkier) bar would seem to be untenable in this arena, as inclined hackers will likely find a workaround to the newest government standards as soon as (if not before) they are even published.

And one last thought on the semantics at play here with regard to patient warnings. The putative warning: "it's possible that a hacker could infect your device" – when said to a particularly tech-illiterate patient who only associates the word "hack" with its machete or meat-cleaver meaning in the traditional vernacular context, and the word "infect" with its associative meaning in the immediate medical context – might be cause for undue alarm. Arguably, though, these two contexts are analogous from a legal and proximate cause standpoint: that is, whether a malicious third-party actor manipulates a medical device from a coffee shop in Jakarta vis-à-vis the Internet, or he physically gains unauthorized access to a hospital room in Springfield to manually sabotage a device, the legal effect of either act to a regulatory-compliant manufacturer should be the same...no liability.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions