United States: Rule Review - Only A True Divisional Can Enter The Safe Harbor Of 35 U.S.C. § 121

For centuries, alchemists attempted to transform base metals such as lead into gold.  Their success against the laws of nature laid out of their reach, but one has to admire the creativity and determination of their efforts.  After all, the potential rewards for success would have been enormous.

The same is true for the U.S. divisional application, which carries a unique and potent protection known as the "safe harbor" provision under 35 U.S.C. § 121:

If two or more independent and distinct inventions are claimed in one application, the Director may require the application to be restricted to one of the inventions.  If the other invention is made the subject of a divisional application which complies with the requirements of section 120 [claiming benefit of priority] it shall be entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the original application.  A patent issuing on an application with respect to which a requirement for restriction under this section has been made, or on an application filed as a result of such a requirement, shall not be used as a reference either in the Patent and Trademark Office or in the courts against a divisional application or against the original application or any patent issued on either of them, if the divisional application is filed before the issuance of the patent on the other application.  The validity of a patent shall not be questioned for failure of the Director to require the application to be restricted to one invention. (Emphasis added.)

The true divisional application is therefore noble, like gold, in that it has special and valuable properties.  The true divisional is immune from having its parent used as a reference against it, which notably could occur in an obviousness-type double-patenting (OTDP) rejection. 

As is well known, the judicially made OTDP doctrine seeks to prevent the unfair extension of patent exclusivity beyond the term of a single patent owned by a single patentee.  The public policy behind this doctrine was originally concerned with the unfair extension of patent term when a U.S. patent had a term of seventeen years from its issue date.  Today, with a twenty-year term from the date of filing, this concern is less pressing.1  A terminal disclaimer, nevertheless, requires that a later patent containing claims subject to an OTDP rejection be commonly assigned throughout its life with the parent in order to be enforceable.  This aspect of the OTDP doctrine protects the public from having to defend against charges of infringement from two patentees for practicing an obvious variant of a single invention.  See In re Zickendraht, 319 F.2d 225, 232, 138 U.S.P.Q. 22, 27 (C.C.P.A .1963) (Rich, J., concurring); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 U.S.P.Q. 761 (C.C.P.A. 1982).

In G.D. Searle LLC v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 2014-1476 (Fed. Cir. June 23, 2015) (Bryson, J.), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a district court ruling finding that OTDP rendered a reissue patent invalid.  This case illustrates that an application cannot be styled as a divisional after the fact in order to benefit from the safe harbor of § 121.

Coplaintiffs G.D. Searle and Pfizer sued five generic drug companies for infringement of reissued U.S. Patent No. RE44,048 ("the RE '048 patent").  The RE '048 patent's lineage began with a parent application filed in 1993, which was subject to a three-way restriction requirement identifying two composition groups and one method of use.  Patentee Pfizer elected to prosecute one group of compound claims, which issued as a patent in 1995.  Pfizer filed a divisional application to claim the other composition group, which later issued as U.S. Patent No. 5,563,165 ("the '165 patent") but never filed a divisional to claim the method of use.  Instead, a continuation-in-part application was filed containing new subject matter.

Pfizer also filed a PCT application, which was also designated a continuation-in-part of the parent application.  The PCT application entered the United States in the national stage.  During examination, the national stage application was also subject to a three-way restriction.  Pfizer elected to prosecute a method-of-use group of claims, which was ultimately allowed as U.S. Patent No. 5,760,068 ("the '068 patent").

In Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 518 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2008), the court addressed a patent infringement action brought by Pfizer on the '068 patent.  The court held that the '068 patent was invalid for OTDP.  In particular, the court found that although the '068 patent shared the same lineage back to the parent application, it was itself a continuation-in-part and not a true divisional, and, therefore, the § 121 safe harbor provision did not apply to the '068 patent.

Pfizer then filed a reissue application, U.S. Patent Application No. 12/205,319 ("the '319 application"), under 35 U.S.C. § 251, stating that it had erred in prosecuting the application as a continuation-in-part rather than as a divisional application.  The reissue application included amendments that removed any subject matter not present in the original parent application, including amending the claims to only recite subject matter appearing in the original parent application.  The reissue examiner, however, rejected the reissue application on the ground that it did not cite an error correctable under the reissue statute.2  In other words, the examiner could not identify where the patent was defective "by reason of a defective specification or drawing, or by reason of the patentee claiming more or less than he had a right to claim in the patent."

Pfizer filed a request for continued examination (RCE) of the '319 application and provided a second reissue declaration, this time specifying various "technical errors" that allegedly rendered the '068 patent indefinite.  The examiner found this declaration to state grounds that were correctable by reissue, and eventually the RE '048 patent issued.

At the district court in G.D. Searle LLC v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,3 the defendants argued that the Pfizer reissue patent was invalid for OTDP because Pfizer was not entitled to invoke the safe harbor in § 121.  The district court agreed, finding that the RE '048 patent was not a true "divisional" and was therefore invalid. Pfizer appealed.

The Federal Circuit first explained that the § 121 safe harbor did not apply to the RE '048 patent because the reissue patent was not a true "divisional" of the parent patent.  According to the court, "[T]he [child] application cannot be a divisional of the [parent] application, despite being designated as such in the reissue patent, because it contains new matter that was not present in the [parent] application."  See G.D. Searle, No. 14-1476, slip op. at 9.  So, even though Pfizer attempted to synthesize a divisional by deleting the new matter filed in the continuation-in-part via reissue proceedings, the Federal Circuit found this to be insufficient, opining that "[s]imply deleting that new matter from the reissue patent does not retroactively alter the nature of the [child] application."  Id.

As an additional reason for denying the safe harbor of § 121 to the RE '048 patent, the court noted that the patent used as a reference for OTDP purposes, the '165 patent, did not derive from the same restriction requirement as the RE '048 patent.  Even though they shared common lineage to the same parent application, the USPTO imposed a separate restriction requirement on the national stage application that matured into the '068 patent.  The Federal Circuit found no evidence that the USPTO intended the earlier restriction requirement in the parent application to carry forward.  Absent this direct relationship, the § 121 safe harbor was found not to apply.

The moral to the story is a simple one.  Applicants in the USPTO wanting to benefit from the § 121 safe harbor should file divisional applications directly from the application where the restriction requirement arises in order to remove any doubt that the divisional application is noble by birth and entitled to the safe harbor by birthright.

Footnotes

1. The question of patent term adjustment (PTA) and patent term extension (PTE) granted by the USPTO as equitable compensation to applicants for administrative delays is a question that intersects with terminal disclaimer practice. Readers with questions related to these complex issues are welcome to contact the author.

2. The applicable section of the (pre-AIA) statute reads: (a) IN GENERAL.--Whenever any patent is, through error without any deceptive intention, deemed wholly or partly inoperative or invalid, by reason of a defective specification or drawing, or by reason of the patentee claiming more or less than he had a right to claim in the patent, the Director shall, on the surrender of such patent and the payment of the fee required by law, reissue the patent for the invention disclosed in the original patent, and in accordance with a new and amended application, for the unexpired part of the term of the original patent.  No new matter shall be introduced into the application for reissue.

3. No. 2:13-cv-00121-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
2 Nov 2017, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

Join us for a two-part webinar series exploring recent developments in machine learning and other technologies that have greatly advanced artificial intelligence (AI) since its origins more than 50 years ago.

9 Nov 2017, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

As part of Strafford Publications’ webinar series, Finnegan attorneys Adriana Burgy, Chris Johns, and Kai Rajan will discuss the Examiner Count System and provide strategies for interacting with examiners.

15 Nov 2017, Conference, California, United States

Finnegan is a Gold sponsor of the second annual Digital Media & IP Forum, hosted by World Congress.

 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.