United States: Two Recent Opinions Reflect Important Developments In Heightened Ascertainability For Class Certification

 "Ascertainability"—that is, whether class members can be ascertained with administrative efficiency—continues to develop as a significant issue in class certification. Two recent opinions, Brecher v. Republic of Argentina, No. 14-4385, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16493 (2d Cir. Sept. 16, 2015), in which the Second Circuit adopted ascertainability as a separate class-certification requirement, and In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 08-md-2002, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124799 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 18, 2015), in which the court applied what has been called "heightened ascertainability" within the Third Circuit, demonstrate how the developing law on ascertainability can impact a class certification outcome. Ascertainability, though, is not necessarily developing uniformly or consistently as a distinct class certification requirement. Significantly, the Seventh Circuit has expressly rejected the concept. It has even come under criticism from judges within the Third Circuit. For practitioners, it is therefore critical to know the law of the circuit in which you are litigating and to continue to closely monitor developments in ascertainability.

Brecher, from the Second Circuit, involved one of a series of class actions by holders of defaulted Argentine bonds. The district court had certified a class to include all holders of beneficial interests in the relevant bonds without limitation as to the time held. (Previously, the Second Circuit had approved a class that incorporated a time limitation). Argentina appealed. In reversing and remanding, the Second Circuit formally adopted ascertainability as a separate class-certification issue. Using language essentially identical to that earlier adopted by the Third Circuit, the Second Circuit held that a class is sufficiently ascertainable when it is defined by objective criteria that are administratively feasible, such that determining membership would not require mini-trials.

Under the newly-adopted ascertainability requirement, the class certified by the district court failed. The class definition incorporated objective criteria, namely owning a beneficial interest in certain bonds. Nonetheless, the class failed because it was too difficult to determine who met the criteria. According to the Second Circuit, the secondary market for Argentine bonds remains active, and the bonds do not have a unique number. So, the court reasoned, it would be nearly impossible to ultimately determine who holds bonds that were opted into or out of the class by previous owners, especially if those bonds were subsequently co-mingled.

In In re Processed Egg Products, the district court, following controlling Third Circuit precedent, applied heightened ascertainability in declining to certify a consumer class action. Three categories of plaintiffs alleged that the nation's major egg producers conspired to increase the price of eggs. Indirect purchasers, i.e., those who bought eggs at a supermarket but not directly from the producers, comprised one category of plaintiffs.

As in Brecher, the putative class of indirect purchasers contained objective criteria, specifically, those who purchased certain types of eggs within a given time period. The class, however, presented an ascertainability problem. Those who bought eggs directly from the producers, typically in very large quantities, could readily demonstrate membership in the direct-purchaser class because the purchasers and the sellers maintained records. But how would someone who purchased one carton of a certain type of eggs from a supermarket several years earlier prove that they in fact made that purchase? In such a circumstance, the buyer or the seller is highly unlikely to have a receipt or other evidence of the sale.

Counsel for the indirect purchasers proposed a solution: potential class members would submit affidavits swearing that they fell within the class definition. Moreover, because the Third Circuit had earlier held that ascertainability requires more than a putative class member's "say so" that he or she is a member of the class, the plaintiffs proposed that a claims administrator would screen and attempt to verify the affidavits.

The plaintiffs' proposed solution fell short. The court held that it could not ignore the "core concern" of ascertainability: that a defendant must be able to challenge class membership. This the defendants could not do when there were no records to identify class members and the proposed methods to weed out unreliable affidavits still did not give the defendants a meaningful opportunity to challenge an individual's membership in the class.

However, after applying Third Circuit precedent, the district court leveled in a footnote two criticisms against the heightened ascertainability requirement. First, pointing to language from a 2015 concurring opinion from Judge Rendell of the Third Circuit and a recent Seventh Circuit opinion rejecting the Third Circuit's approach, the court stated that heightened ascertainability is "disharmonious" with Rule 23's aims. Rule 23 requires that courts balance the difficulties in managing a class action against the countervailing interests of whether a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy. Heightened ascertainability, the Seventh Circuit reasoned, upsets this balance by placing too great an emphasis on managing the class action. The result is to effectively bar low-value consumer class actions. Second, the court questioned why affidavits are essentially considered incompetent evidence for class actions while they are competent evidence in most other settings.

Brecher and In re Processed Egg Products provide key takeaways about ascertainability, but important questions remain.

  • The Third Circuit's ascertainability standard continues to be a significant area for both sides to address in Rule 23(b)(3) class actions. This is especially true for consumer class actions involving relatively low-cost goods or services for which consumers are unlikely to keep a receipt after purchase.
  • The Second Circuit's adoption of ascertainability as a separate class certification issue, not merely an aspect of Rule 23(b)(3)'s predominance requirement, in a way that tracks the Third Circuit strongly suggests that the parties to class actions in that circuit will need to be prepared to address as an evidentiary matter at the time of class certification whether it is administratively feasible to identify class members.
  • Objective criteria, long helpful in demonstrating ascertainability, alone may be insufficient for class certification if it is difficult to determine who meets the objective criteria.
  • It remains to be seen whether other circuits will follow the Third Circuit's lead and adopt heightened ascertainability as a separate class certification issue or whether they will continue with the traditional approach of applying a lower level of ascertainability as part of Rule 23(b)(3)'s predominance inquiry. The Eleventh Circuit in a non-precedential opinion recently tilted towards the Third Circuit's approach, whereas the Seventh Circuit expressly rejected that approach.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions