United States: Colombian Companies Face New Compliance Challenges As Nation Ascends To World Economic Stage

When OFAC added Colombian sports franchise Envigado Fútbol Club to its sanctions list in June 2014,1 the news conjured up echoes of past dark days of "narco-fútbol," when the tentacles of organized crime touched the country's business and social institutions at all levels. In a broader context, perhaps the most striking aspect of the Envigado designation was its diminishing importance amid the new array of compliance imperatives facing Colombian companies in a rapidly changing global environment. Trade compliance is quickly becoming not just a necessity but also a big plus factor that can work in Colombia's favor: a strong reputation for trade compliance and effective internal controls can provide an important competitive advantage for Colombian companies in the global marketplace.

Over the last decade, Colombia has made great strides toward shaking off the shadows of an era marked by corruption and violent internal conflict. By 2014, Colombia overtook Argentina to become Latin America's third-largest economy.2 And, with the country's marked advances toward a peace agreement and a growing international economic presence, the relevance of U.S. export control and sanctions requirements for Colombian companies has changed: it has shifted from narrow concerns about being named as OFAC targets to a larger perspective that regards trade compliance as a key business principle to enhance competitive advantage and to expand opportunities for continued growth.

During this same period, U.S. sanctions and export controls also have undergone significant change. As Colombia emerges as an economic force, and begins a new phase in its trade partnership with the United States, Colombian businesses must address requirements of trade compliance that extend far beyond the realm of punitive economic sanctions, which were first imposed by OFAC's predecessor, the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Funds Control (FCC), as part of the U.S. wartime effort in the 1940s. In the current environment, trade compliance is based on various, overlapping regulatory requirements that present as many opportunities for competitive gain as they do risks for the imposition of penalties and business harm.

The History of US Strategic Trade Controls

To understand the current U.S. sanctions and export controls regime, it is instructive to look back at the phases of its development and the competing domestic and global pressures that have shaped the compliance and enforcement landscape we know today.

After blocking the Axis powers' financial assets during World War II, the FCC became the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) during the Korean War, claiming its long-term role as the U.S. government's primary instrument of economic warfare. The U.S.-Colombia political and trade relationship was born during the same era, when, post-WWII, the United States became Colombia's primary market for exports, and Colombian soldiers fought alongside U.S. troops in the Korean War under the United Nations banner.

In the more-than 60 years since—a period during which Colombia was to a large extent diverted from the world stage by a four-sided internal conflict involving drug cartels, right-wing paramilitaries, the leftist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), and government forces3—the U.S. sanctions regime has seen many incarnations. With the onset of the Cold War, U.S. sanctions authorized under the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA)4 expanded into trade embargoes designed to restrict Soviet bloc access to sensitive technology. These embargoes were comprehensive in scope, broadly prohibiting U.S. persons, companies and foreign subsidiaries from doing any business at all with the embargoed countries. Penalties, however, were low and enforcement minimal.

The late 1970s brought a fresh spate of legislation, some of which sought to narrow and tailor the scope of U.S. economic tools of statecraft. The International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA)5 clarified and restricted presidential power to impose sanctions, limiting the competitive disadvantage to U.S. companies posed by broad unilateral sanctions and specifying conditions for the continued declaration of national security emergencies, which were the statutory bases for ongoing OFAC action. In addition, the Export Administration Act of 1979 (EAA)6 invested the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security with the authority to administer the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), separate from Treasury's OFAC. The 1976 enactment of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), administered by the Department of State, and 1977's Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which expanded the Department of Justice's extraterritorial reach, were also part of the shift to a constellation of related regulations affecting a broad range of transactions involving the United States.

In 1995, President Clinton issued an executive order under IEEPA prohibiting transactions with narcotics traffickers,7 and OFAC implemented its narcotics sanctions program. By 2006, OFAC's SDN list expanded to include more than 500 companies and 800 individuals affiliated with Colombia's Cali, North Valle, and North Coast drug cartels,8 and was the primary sanctions tool governing U.S. commerce with Colombia. These targeted measures reflected an underlying trend of using economic sanctions to further various sets of U.S. foreign policy objectives, including efforts to combat narcotics trafficking.

The attacks of 9/11 and the growth of renewed tensions with Iran ushered in a "sanctions revolution,"9 as the United States implemented a new wave of market restrictions, penalties and terrorist finance measures to address growing concerns about international terrorism. These steps were augmented with efforts to gain multilateral support for sanctions against Iran and terrorist groups, as U.S. policymakers recognized the limited effectiveness and collateral harm of unilateral action.

As the new millennium advanced, regulatory scrutiny zeroed in on global flows of capital being illegally funneled through the U.S. financial system by and for the benefit of sanctioned countries and entities. In response, the U.S. government stepped up enforcement against foreign financial institutions with correspondent banking relationships or operations in the United States. Major prosecutions of banks such as ABN AMRO, Lloyds and Credit Suisse, with fines reaching the hundreds of millions of dollars, punctuated this trend and elevated sanctions risks to a higher level than ever before.

During this same period, the IEEPA Enhancement Act of 200710 increased penalties for sanctions violations to the greater of (a) $250,000, or (b) two times the value of the transaction. This legislation also expanded the extraterritorial jurisdiction of U.S. sanctions by making it unlawful for any person to cause or attempt to cause a U.S. person to commit a violation of U.S. sanctions. Faced with potential legal liability, business disruption and reputational harm, many foreign financial institutions and companies chose to pursue a "de-risking strategy," stepping away from transactions that bear a heightened sanctions risk.

The trend of extraterritorial application of U.S. trade compliance has continued an upward swing in recent years. For example, since 2012, the United States has imposed secondary sanctions against foreign entities that do business with Iran in critical sectors (though such secondary sanctions will be lifted as part of the recent Iran nuclear deal), and more recently U.S. sanctions and export restrictions imposed in response to Russian incursions into Ukraine also have had an intended extraterritorial dimension. The same is true for U.S. enforcement actions, as more and more non-U.S. persons are the targets of civil and criminal penalties for activities involving the unauthorized re-export of U.S. goods and services outside the United States.

The Current Sanctions and Export Control Climate

Colombia's emergence as a major economic force, and its rising prominence as a trade partner with the United States, comes at a time when the U.S. has more than two dozen sanctions programs in place,11 and is pursuing extraterritorial enforcement with continued zeal.

Hundreds of names have been removed from OFAC's SDN list in recent years,12 as narcotics trafficking has receded in relevance to the country's business community and to dealings with the United States in an era of expanding peace and prosperity.

Current trade compliance imperatives for Colombian companies stem instead from the complex regulatory regimes governing U.S. financial and commercial transactions. These requirements arise from the rules imposed by various U.S. government agencies (i.e., not just OFAC, but also the maze of transaction and export restrictions from the U.S. State, Justice and Commerce Departments)— each with their own respective mandates, procedures and areas of authorization. These types of trade compliance requirements can change quickly, as new U.S. executive orders and implementing regulations are established in response to ongoing geopolitical exigencies. In this environment, it is critical for companies to monitor developments, assess relevant risks and put into place proper internal controls to maintain trade compliance. A failure to do so not only means possible enforcement penalties but also lost business opportunities.

As Colombia becomes an increasingly attractive target for foreign investment, and Colombian businesses become enmeshed in ever more complex global distribution and supply chains—with more counterparties and more jurisdictions presenting varying levels of risk—these touch points are likely to trigger higher trade compliance obligations. In addition to the necessity of maintaining their own internal controls, Colombian companies are now more dependent upon the compliance of others.

Trade compliance requirements are of particular relevance to companies that import, re-export or rely on the incorporation of U.S.-origin goods, software or technology in the development of their own products, or that partner with U.S. original equipment manufacturers, exporters or service providers. Ongoing compliance responsibilities are also likely to weigh more heavily on companies operating in high-risk sectors, such as defense, financial services, technology and energy—and they also extend to other areas of operation that make or incorporate "dual use" items. In addition, maintaining adequate trade compliance is critical for transactions that present a financial nexus to the United States—a connection that is often unavoidable in a world where so many dealings are U.S.-dollar denominated. In the current sanctions climate, financial services companies occupy a particularly fraught place. Often it is assumed that such firms are better positioned than the regulators themselves to know where illicit activity occurs or may ensue, so that—like it or not—financial institutions have been effectively "deputized" to serve on the front lines of compliance. Any bank or other financial institution with branches, correspondent accounts, or other banking relationships in the United States or with U.S. banks, or those exposed to global financial markets, is responsible for maintaining stringent anti–money laundering and sanction compliance controls. Compliance lapses can bring stiff penalties, as seen in the May 2015 BNP Paribas case, which resulted in an order for the bank to forfeit $8.83 billion, pay a $140 million fine, and strengthen its compliance policies and procedures.13

But it is not just the risk of reputational harm and financial penalties that should spur Colombian companies and financial institutions to embrace compliance. Rather, trade compliance is rapidly becoming a competitive differentiator, which can work to Colombia's significant advantage in developing new international business opportunities. A strong commitment to trade compliance and effective internal controls can be critical for Colombian companies in winning the confidence of investors and counterparties, serving as a catalyst for growth and demonstrating a new readiness to become key players on the global economic stage.


1. Press release, U.S. Department of the Treasury, "Treasury Designates the Financial Core and Support Network of Colombian Criminal Group La Oficina de Envigado," Nov. 19, 2014, http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl9705.aspx.

2. Eleanor Wragg, "The birth of a new Colombia," The Report Company (May 2015), http://www.the-report.net/colombia/may2015/1238-the-birth-of-a-new-colombia.

3. Ed Vulliamy, "Colombia: is the end in sight to the world's longest war?", The Guardian (March 15, 2015), http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/15/colombia-end-in-sight-longest-running-conflict.

4. 50 U.S.C. App. §§ 1—44 (2012).

5. 50 U.S.C. Chapter 35 (2012).

6. Pub. L. No. 96-72, 93 Stat. 503 (1979).

7. Executive Order 12978, Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions With Significant Narcotics Traffickers, Oct. 24, 1995, http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Documents/12978.pdf.

8. Office of Foreign Assets Control, Impact Report: Economic Sanctions Against Columbian Drug Cartels (Mar. 2007), p. 2, http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Documents/narco_impact_report_05042007.pdf.

9. Jennifer M. Harris, The Key to U.S. Sanctions Happiness? A Short National Memory, Lawfare Blog (Nov. 2, 2014, 10:00 AM), https://www.lawfareblog.com/foreign-policy-essay-key-us-sanctions-happiness-short-national-memory.

10. 50 U.S.C. § 1705 (2012).

11. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Resource Center, Sanctions Programs and Country Information, http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Pages/Programs.aspx  (last visited Sept. 25, 2015).

12. Press Release, U.S. Department of the Treasury, "Treasury Lifts Sanctions on the Defunct Colombian Business Empire lied by the Rodriguez Orejuela Family," June 19, 2014, http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl2436.aspx.

13. Press Release, U.S. Department of Justice, "BNP Paribas Sentenced for Conspiring to Violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Trading with the Enemy Act," May 1, 2015, http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/bnp-paribas-sentenced-conspiring-violate-international-emergency-economic-powers-act-and.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions