United States: The Suddenly Offensive Claim Of Patent Invalidity

At the heart of almost every claim of patent infringement is a battle fought over the validity of the patent at issue. Born out of the idea that an invalid patent cannot be infringed, accused infringers have defended themselves from claims of patent infringement by arguing that the patent at issue is invalid. But the defense of patent invalidity is now changing. Now, the defense has offensive value. And that change threatens to throw a system, which functions best in balance, out of balance once again. 

While every patent issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office receives an examination and is presumed valid in the eyes of the law, no patent owner can truly take confidence in the validity of their patent until the patent's validity is tested in the fires of litigation. It is in litigation where huge resources can be brought with focused attention on every nit and nuance of the patent at issue to truly test the validity of the claims asserted. Pass this test, and show that the accused infringer is practicing the covered technology, and patent infringers succeed. Fail, and they lose their asset.

Historically, the interests of those owning a patent were balanced by an accused infringer's motivation to invalidate the patent at issue. There was always a chance that by asserting their patent, the patent owners may find their patent assets invalidated — freeing all competitors to practice the once exclusive technology covered by the now extinct patents. This could give patent owners pause if their patents had any potential validity issues.

But, with the rise of non-practicing entities — the so-called patent trolls — the balance began to shift. Non-practicing entities were not in the marketplace of those they were accusing of infringement.  These entities had no competitors. They were not practicing the technology covered by their patents and thus had little concern with whether their patents were invalidated during the course of litigation. The non-practicing entities held presumably valid patent rights and they would assert them against anyone and everyone they could identify as possible infringers. If an asserted patent was invalidated, they had a stable of many more patents waiting to be asserted against new defendants. And thus, the danger of patent invalidity ceased to be the break on aggressive, or even suspect, patent litigation it once was.

This shift in the balance between patent owners and those seeking to invalidate patents opened the gates to increasingly aggressive patent litigation. This meant that more and more patents with weak, vague, and even suspect claims were being asserted against more and more defendants. With little to lose, there was no reason for non-practicing entities to think twice before filing suit on virtually any patent they could find potential defendants infringing. 

For this reason, and others, efforts began to curb the rise of these non-practicing entities. Cries to reform patent law increasingly rang out from technology companies who found themselves involved in wave after wave of expensive, and increasingly abusive, patent infringement litigation. One result of this reform was an increase in the options available to accused infringers for challenging the validity of patents in administrative proceedings. Patent reform created the Post-Grant Review, Inter-Partes Review and Covered Business Method Review procedures as alternatives to litigation.

These administrative methods for reviewing issued patents at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office allowed for issued patents to be challenged on the same grounds as could be raised in litigation — but often at lower costs and with burdens of proof which favored those challenging the patents. These proceedings were given streamlined dockets that guaranteed reviews were completed on tight timetables. These tight timetables allowed courts to more easily stay expensive (and potentially abusive patent litigation) in lieu of the administrative proceedings until it could be determined that a valid patent was at issue. As these new administrative proceedings took off in popularity, Courts increasingly stayed litigation in favor of the administrative reviews and the administrative reviews increasingly invalidated the challenged patents, the balance between patent owner and patent invalidator appeared to be reaching equilibrium again.

And then Wall Street figured out how to profit from the proceedings.  A group of hedge fund managers were intrigued by the vast number of patents being invalidated in the new administrative proceedings created by patent reform. Patents that were successfully put into these administrative proceedings were being invalidated at very high rates. So long as one could muster enough prior art to place a patent into one of these reviews, the patent at issue was more than likely to be invalidated. 

For companies who relied heavily on patent protection to recoup research and development expenses — like pharmaceutical companies — the difference between having patent protection and no patent protection could be huge to the company's bottom line. When hedge fund managers learned the likelihood of having patents in post-grant review administrative proceedings found invalid, they realized that money could be made on the process.

The hedge fund managers noticed that the broad regulations allowing for the challenge of patents in these administrative proceedings were open to anyone who wished to participate. Anyone could challenge patents — all the better to rid the country of worthless, suspect patents.  So hedge fund managers realized that if they targeted certain pharmaceutical companies challenged those companies' key patents, they could drop the value of those companies' publicly traded stocks.  The hedge fund managers would know which companies patents were being targeted (because they were the ones doing the targeting) and they could simply short those stocks on the exchange and reap huge profits for their work. 

This result has swung the balance between patent owners and patent invalidators once again — this time in favor of those challenging issued patents. There is now financial incentive to remove patents from the marketplace and to target companies who rely heavily on patent protection in doing so. This does nothing to promote the development of new and useful technology — it does the exact opposite. It disincentivizes companies from investing in patent protection for fear of putting a target on their backs.  This ultimately results in less technology being developed.

As patent reform continues to be debated in Congress (and as its chances of passing seem to be growing slimmer and slimmer every day), this issue is not on the table. While discussions continue on fee shifting legislation or pleading standards, little to nothing is being said about abusive patent validity challenges. At a minimum, the rise of "patent invalidation for profit" should give Congress pause. Every effort to "reform" or adjust the patent system and its laws and regulations will have unintended consequences. The rush to kill the patent troll has already produced some. Congress would be wise to consider this lesson as it mulls still further changes to the patent system. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.