United States: Federal Circuit: Design Patents Valuable In Protecting Product Trade Dress

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al., ___ F.3d ___ (Fed Cir. 2015)

Those of you following the continuing U.S. infringement case between Apple Inc. ("Apple") and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("Samsung") based on their respective iPhone and Samsung Galaxy designs undoubtedly recall the $1 billion in damages awarded to Apple by the jury in 2012 in the Northern District of California.  That judgment, based on infringement of Apple's asserted design patents and its claim of registered and unregistered trade dress rights in the iPhone design, was later reduced to about $900 million.  The verdict and award was also, not surprisingly, appealed by Samsung to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit upheld the infringement of Apple's asserted design patents, but reversed the finding of trade dress infringement, finding Apple's claimed trade dress to be functional and therefore unprotectable.  The difference in how Apple's design patents and trade dress were treated by the appellate court is both interesting and instructive. 

In the U.S., design patents cannot claim a product design that is purely functional in nature.  There must be some ornamental features present in the design to make it eligible for design patenting.  Yet, the Federal Circuit decision shows that a product design can be deemed functional and therefore unprotectable as trade dress, even where the same design is protected by a valid design patent and found to be infringed. 

Trade dress rights are, in effect, trademark rights that are claimed in the overall design of a product, such as a mobile phone.  To be protectable, the trade dress cannot be "functional" in nature, that is, it cannot be comprised of product features that are so useful and utilitarian in nature that recognizing exclusive rights in the design would inhibit others from offering competing products that are used in the same way.  In addition, trade dress protections require a substantial evidentiary showing that the design is known and has acquired distinctiveness in identifying a particular commercial source among the public at large.  Once established, trade dress rights can be perpetual, so long as the trade dress continues to be in use.

Design patents, meanwhile, cover novel and non-obvious designs as expressed in the ornamental features of a product.  In a design patent, the claimed design is set out in drawings or photos and these illustrations define the patent's scope.  In an infringement context, the drawings are compared to accused infringing products, and infringement is then determined based on whether, in the eyes of an ordinary observer, the accused product design is substantially the same as the patented design.  Egyptian Goddess Inc. v. Swisa Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (en banc).  Design patents filed after May 13, 2015 have a term of 15 years from issuance (formerly they had a 14 year term).

In its case against the Samsung Galaxy phones, Apple asserted its design patents in the shape and outline of its iPhone, as well as on the icons and graphical user interface displayed by the phone.  Apple also asserted trade dress rights based on a U.S. trademark registration that also covers the display screen and icons of the iPhone, and based on common law trade dress rights in the iPhone shape and outline.  Under U.S. law, trade dress rights and design patent rights can co-exist for the same design features, and asserting infringement of both rights is not inconsistent (indeed, obtaining a design patent while the owner develops rights in that trade dress through use over time can be a valid protection strategy).

However, in asserting claims of trade dress infringement against the Samsung Galaxy phones, Apple relied on a claim of infringement by dilution, and not likelihood of confusion which is the traditional claim made in trade dress or trademark infringement cases.  Dilution requires a showing of fame of the asserted trade dress at the time the accused infringing design entered the market, and seeks to protect the design's widespread reputation, often resulting in potentially broader protections.  A dilution claim is not intended to protect consumers from confusion as to the source of similar trade dress, so the presence or absence of actual confusion in the marketplace is not dispositive.  Thus, dilution protects the owner of a well-known mark from suffering adverse effects as to its strength or value, and assumes that an infringing article blurs the consumer's association of the famous design as an exclusive identifier of its goods/services.

Although Apple's dilution claim did not require them to establish that consumers would confuse the Samsung designs with Apple's trade dress, it may have created other challenges.  For one, dilution reflects a substantial broadening of traditional trademark rights that some commentators feel may adversely affect competition.  This may compound the burden of persuasion in a trade dress case where many also take the view that broad claims of trade dress rights adversely affect competition, given their potentially inhibiting effect on developing new product designs and their potentially perpetual duration.  Therefore, courts may be more wary of a trade dress dilution claim that could grant too great a scope of design rights.

In this respect, the Federal Circuit decision may have telegraphed the court's wariness from the outset.  At the beginning of its analysis, the court stated: "Protection for trade dress exists to promote competition. The protection for source identification, however, must be balanced against a fundamental right to compete through imitation of a competitor's product. This right can only be temporarily denied by the patent or copyright laws [but] in contrast, trademark law allows for a perpetual monopoly and its use in the protection of physical details and design of a product must be limited to those that are nonfunctional."  Slip Op.  p. 7, 2015 WL 2343543 (C.A.Fed. 2015).   Other citations omitted.

While the District Court specifically found the question of whether Apple's trade dress was functional to be a question of fact for the jury to decide, the Federal Circuit seemingly reached the exact opposite conclusion.    The circuit court held that no reasonable jury could have found Apple's trade dress to be protectable, as the asserted trade dress was "clearly functional," and that Apple failed the applicable functionality test of showing that its trade dress served no other purpose than of identifying a particular commercial source.  This was a test derived from the law of the Ninth Circuit, which the Federal Circuit was obligated to apply in an appeal on an Lanham Act case taken from a California court (indeed, the court pointed out that Apple could cite no prior case in the Ninth Circuit where product design trade dress was found to be nonfunctional).  This "high bar for non-functionality" standard  prompted reversal of the jury verdict and a finding that Apple's registered and unregistered trade dress, and the individual design features shown therein, were both functional and not protectable.   Slip Op.  p. 9, 2015 WL 2343543 (C.A.Fed. 2015) 

In contrast, the circuit court treated Apple's design patents more favorably.  It rejected Samsung's arguments that the District Court should have instructed the jury to not consider the same elements found to be functional in the trade dress when determining design patent infringement.  According to the Federal Circuit, excluding any components was not a proper reading of its design patent case law. Rather, individual product features, whether functional or not, should not be read out from a design patent claim since the comparison must be of the entire designs. 

Although the circuit court's finding seems to be at odds with the rationale for rejecting Apple's trade dress rights, it must be noted that the validity of Apple's design patents was not at issue (this issue had been decided by the district court, and appealed, before the case below went to the jury, and validity was not part of the jury verdict).  But it seems apparent from the decision that "functionality" applies differently to design patents and to trade dress.  In the design patent context, "functionality" is interpreted very narrowly, and design patents will be applicable to cover product designs that would otherwise be considered to be functional and unprotectable as trade dress.  Therefore, the value of filing design patent applications first on a product design is crucial, as no amount of sales, promotions or "look for" advertising will suffice to overcome the "high bar of non-functionality" courts will likely apply (especially in the Ninth Circuit) to the design of useful articles such as electronic devices and other utilitarian items. 

In sum, this decision shows the value of  obtaining design patents for any new and unique product designs, rather than relying on common law trade dress rights (or even trademark registrations) in an infringement context.  Even where the trade dress is "non-functional," there are challenges in both establishing acquired distinctiveness of the trade dress and in demonstrating that consumers are likely to be confused by accused infringing product designs, let alone meeting the necessary threshold of establishing fame of the trade dress before pursuing a dilution claim.  Design patents should be filed promptly to avoid prior art issues (including prior disclosures of the design by the owner itself—the U.S. affords only a one-year grace period for filing design patents after the design is disclosed to the public, and other countries automatically preclude coverage after disclosure).  Therefore, proper consideration and planning of a strategy for protection of product designs is critical. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.