On September 8, 2015, the Southern District of New York dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, a large portion of claims from a derivative class action alleging that Citibank NA, as trustee of 27 trusts, had breached its contractual, statutory, and common law duties in connection with $17 billion of pooled loans. Plaintiffs invoked federal jurisdiction based on the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 ("TIA") and asked the court to take supplemental jurisdiction over the accompanying state law claims. Plaintiffs asserted TIA claims in connection with just 3 of the 27 trusts. The court held that those claims could proceed, denying Citibank's argument that the TIA does not provide a private right of action. However, the court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims relating to the other 24 trusts. The court concluded that supplemental jurisdiction was permissible, but that it should nonetheless decline such jurisdictions because the claims as to each trust—which must be litigated loan-by-loan and trust-by-trust—were not sufficiently related.Order.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.