United States: Texas Appeals Court Denies Use Of Compact's Three-Factor Formula As Revised Texas Franchise Tax Is Not Considered An Income Tax

The Texas Court of Appeals has affirmed a trial court's decision that a taxpayer cannot elect to use the equally-weighted three-factor apportionment formula provided by the Multistate Tax Compact, and therefore must use a single receipts factor to compute its Revised Texas Franchise Tax (RTFT).1 The Court concluded that the RTFT is not an income tax under the definition of the Compact, and therefore the Compact's three-factor election does not apply.


Graphic Packaging Corporation (Graphic), a Delaware corporation headquartered in Georgia, sells packaging for consumer products in multiple states, including Texas. Graphic initially filed its 2008 and 2009 RTFT reports using an apportionment formula solely based on the receipts factor. Subsequently, Graphic filed amended 2008 and 2009 reports and an original 2010 report applying an equally-weighted property, payroll, and receipts factor apportionment formula as allowed by the Compact. Since Graphic did not own or operate any manufacturing operations in Texas and only engaged in retail and wholesale activities in Texas, the use of the Compact election greatly reduced its Texas apportionment factor.

The Comptroller denied the use of the Compact's three-factor election under audit for Graphic's 2008-2010 report years. Graphic's refund claims and assessment were combined in a single administrative hearing in which the refund claims were denied and the assessment upheld by the Comptroller. Subsequently, Graphic filed suit against the Comptroller in a Texas district court where, again, the Comptroller prevailed. The district court did not provide reasoning for its decision, and Graphic appealed the case to the Texas Court of Appeals.

Texas' Adoption of the Compact

Texas adopted the Compact on August 4, 1967, and codified this adoption in Chapter 141 of the Texas Tax Code.2 Under the Compact, a taxpayer may elect to use an equally-weighted apportionment formula of property, payroll, and receipts for an income tax as an alternative to a state-prescribed apportionment method. For RTFT reports originally due before January 1, 2008, Texas law specifically stated that the Compact did not apply.3 This specific non-application provision was repealed when the RTFT was enacted for reports due on or after January 1, 2008.

By its own terms, the Compact applies only to an income tax, defined as "a tax imposed on or measured by net income including any tax imposed on or measured by an amount arrived at by deducting expenses from gross income, one or more forms of which expenses are not specifically and directly related to particular transactions."4

Court of Appeals' Determination of RTFT As a Non-Income Tax

At the Texas Court of Appeals, Graphic contended that the RTFT is an income tax under the Compact's definition, as its margin was calculated using the cost of goods sold (COGS) method, or revenue minus applicable expenses, which meets the definition of net income. Accordingly, Graphic argued that the Compact's three-factor alternative method of apportionment should apply. The Comptroller countered that the single receipts apportionment method was required to be used because the RTFT is not an income tax. Texas law provides that a taxable entity's margin for RTFT should be apportioned based on a single receipts factor.5

The Court began its analysis by reviewing the definition of "income tax" under the Compact, and relying upon the plain meaning of the term "net income" within that definition, as such term was not defined in the Compact. According to the Court, "net income" was appropriately defined as the "excess of all revenues and gains for a period over all expenses and losses of the period."6

The Court then considered the methods available to calculate taxable margin under the RTFT: (i) 70 percent of total revenue; (ii) revenue less COGS; (iii) revenue less compensation; and (iv) revenue less $1 million.7 The Court concluded that 70 percent of total revenue is not tantamount to "net income" and that total revenue less $1 million is not synonymous with deducting expenses from gross income to arrive at "net income." Because the COGS and compensation deductions are limited, the Court likewise found that these methods did not meet the definition of "net income."

Graphic also argued that income tax and gross receipts tax as defined by the Compact are mutually exclusive terms. "Gross receipts tax" is defined by the Compact to mean "a tax other than a sales tax, which is imposed on or measured by the gross volume of business, in terms of gross receipts or in other terms, and in the determination of which no deduction is allowed which would constitute the tax an income tax."8 Graphic reasoned that since the RTFT did not fall under this definition, it must be an income tax. The Court agreed that the RTFT did not fall within the definition of a "gross receipts tax," but rejected the contention that the RTFT had to be classified as an income tax as a result.

Graphic had raised three issues in its original appeal to the state: (i) the apportionment formula under the RTFT9 did not impliedly repeal the Compact's election provision and formula; (ii) if an implied repeal occurred, the repeal was invalid because the Compact is an interstate agreement that is binding on the party states unless and until they withdraw, and (iii) if the Compact's election and formula were not repealed, the RTFT should be considered an income tax under the Compact.

Because Graphic never overcame the "income tax" hurdle, the arguments concerning the application or repeal of the Compact became superfluous and were not considered by the Court in its opinion.

Interestingly, the Court made no mention of the Texas legislature's provision that:

The franchise tax imposed by Chapter 171, Tax Code, as amended by this Act, is not an income tax and Pub. L. No. 86-272 does not apply to the tax.10

The Court also did not reference the Texas Supreme Court's Allcat11 decision. In Allcat, the taxpayer argued that the RTFT was ultimately a tax on individual partners of a partnership and therefore was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court in Allcat concluded that the RTFT was a tax on the entity, not the individuals, and ultimately did not decide on whether the RTFT was considered an income tax.


Given the potential for significant refunds and tax savings if successful, Graphic is expected to submit a request for rehearing by the Texas Court of Appeals, or appeal directly to the Texas Supreme Court. After considering how courts in other states have ruled on this issue, it would appear that Graphic's chances of obtaining the ability to use the Compact election are relatively slim, even if the RTFT could be characterized as an income tax for purposes of the Compact. By extension, the hopes of many similarly situated taxpayers may hang in the same balance.

In International Business Machines v. Department of Treasury,12 the Michigan Supreme Court ruled in favor of the taxpayer's use of the Compact's three-factor election for purposes of the Michigan Business Tax (MBT). However, the state of Michigan promptly enacted legislation that retroactively repealed the Compact and may have eliminated virtually all rights to refunds.13 This solution, which itself has been challenged,14 may serve as a template for other states to follow in response to adverse decisions in this area. In California, a taxpayer victory in The Gillette Co. v. Franchise Tax Board15 with respect to the applicability of the election for California corporation franchise tax purposes is being challenged at the California Supreme Court, and the very lengthy wait for a decision in this case could imply a potential reversal.16 One distinction between the IBM and Gillette cases, and the Texas Court of Appeals' disposition of the RTFT challenge is that the MBT and the California corporation franchise tax were both classified as "income taxes," a determination that Graphic could not obtain.

It should be noted that the Texas Court of Appeals' classification of the RTFT as something other than an income tax, at least for Compact purposes, differs from the positions in several other states and financial accounting standards treating the RTFT as an income tax.

Many states treat the RTFT as an income tax for state tax addback purposes, meaning that the amount of RTFT deducted on the federal income tax return must be added back to federal taxable income. Further, many states treat the RTFT as an income tax that if paid by a taxpayer, may be eligible as a credit for other taxes paid on a resident return. For example, a credit for the RTFT paid may be taken on individual income tax returns in Kansas,17 Missouri,18 and Wisconsin.19

With respect to financial accounting, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) concluded that the RTFT should be treated as an income tax for reporting FAS 109 (now ASC 740) Accounting for Income Taxes purposes, as the tax is based upon a "measure of income."20 However, the FASB declined to provide guidance as to the "income tax" status of the RTFT.

The potential characterization of the RTFT as an income tax has additional implications. For example, Public Law 86-272 applies, conceptually and in practice, only to income taxes. Therefore, taxpayers' potential ability to claim P.L. 86-272 protection via the RTFT, which currently does not exist, conceivably could change if Graphic can successfully argue that the RTFT fits within the Compact's definition of income tax.


1 Graphic Packaging Corp. v. Hegar, Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin, No. 03-14- 00197-CV, July 28, 2015.

2 TEX. TAX CODE ANN. § 141.001.

3 TEX. TAX CODE ANN. § 171.112(g), repealed effective January 1, 2008.

4 TEX. TAX CODE ANN. § 141.001, art. II.4.

5 TEX. TAX CODE ANN. § 171.106.

6 Black's Law Dictionary 1040 (6th ed. 1990).

7 TEX. TAX CODE ANN. § 171.101.

8 TEX. TAX CODE ANN. § 141.001.

9 TEX. TAX CODE ANN. § 171.106(a), which provides: "Except as provided by this section, a taxable entity's margin is apportioned to this state to determine the amount of tax imposed under Section 171.002 by multiplying the margin by a fraction, the numerator of which is the taxable entity's gross receipts from business done in this state, as determined under Section 171.103, and the denominator of which is the taxable entity's gross receipts from its entire business, as determined under Section 171.105." [Emphasis added.]

10 H.B. 3, Laws 2006, Special Session, uncodified § 21.

11 In Re Allcat Claims Service, L.P., 356 S.W.3d 455 (Tex. 2011).

12 852 N.W.2d 865 (Mich. 2014). For a discussion of this case, see GT SALT Alert: Michigan Supreme Court Allows Multistate Tax Compact Three-Factor Apportionment Election for 2008 MBT Return.

13 Act 282 (S.B. 156), Laws 2014. For further discussion of this Michigan legislation, see GT SALT Alert: Michigan Enacts Legislation Designed to Eliminate Multistate Tax Compact Apportionment Election Refunds Allowed by IBM Case.

14 Yaskawa America, Inc. v. Department of Treasury, Michigan Court of Claims, No. 11-000077-MT, Dec. 19, 2014. For a discussion of this case, see GT SALT Alert: Michigan Court of Claims Upholds Legislation Retroactively Repealing Multistate Tax Compact.

15 209 Cal. App. 4th 938 (2012).

16 Gillette Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, California Supreme Court, No. S206587. Note that the California Supreme Court granted the petition to review this case on January 16, 2013.

17 Opinion Letter No. O-2008-04, Kansas Department of Revenue, Sept. 2, 2008.

18 Letter Ruling No. LR5309, Missouri Department of Revenue, Dec. 12, 2008.

19 Publication 125, Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Nov. 2007.

20 Financial Accounting Standards Board, Minutes of the August 2, 2006 Board Meeting on the Potential FSP: Texas Franchise Tax, Aug. 2, 2006.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.