United States: How To Protect Your Brand From Your Partner's Opinions

Can chefs and restaurateurs escape from agreements with business partners whose subsequent statements or activities threaten to sully their brand? Here's what happened in two recently filed litigations on the issue and some additional protections that business owners could incorporate into agreements.

Presidential hopeful Donald Trump recently sued the companies associated with the well-known chefs Geoffrey Zakarian and Jose Andres. Trump's company claims that the chefs' attempts to disassociate themselves from Trump and his infamously inflammatory remarks about Mexican immigrants breached their agreements to build restaurants in the new Trump International Hotel in The Old Post Office Building in Washington, D.C. Both chefs maintain that Trump's comments entitled them to terminate their deals, with a spokesperson telling the press that "Simply put, Trump's comments made [Andres' company] ThinkFoodGroup's participation in this project impossible and constituted a breach which the landlord, Trump Old Post Office LLC, refused to remedy."

Trump Old Post Office LLC  responded by filing a federal action against Jose Andres's restaurant groups on July 31 and an action in D.C. Superior Court against Geoffrey Zakarian's groups on Aug. 4. Each complaint alleges a breach of the sublease to operate a first-class restaurant in approximately 9,000 square feet of space in the building, a claim against each guarantor for performance of each tenant's obligations and attorneys' fees. The case against Andres was voluntarily dismissed on Aug. 24 citing lack of diversity jurisdiction and no new suit has been filed in state court yet, but Trump's next move remains to be seen.

The restaurant business has become increasingly competitive and media-sensitive, in part as a result of the popularity of food-focused TV programming. High-profile restaurateurs have become public figures who must ensure that their brands remain untarnished by public actions of their prominent investors or co-owners. One way to do this is to include explicit contractual protections that would allow a party to cancel a contract on the basis of public statements or behavior that may place a restaurant project at risk. For example, a so-called "morals clause" would prohibit a party from degrading the value of the restaurant's brand. Another option is a nondisparagement clause, which could prohibit objectionable statements, possibly permitting relief when the relationship goes sour.

Morals clauses play an important role in endorsement deals and entertainment transactions involving public figures. They protect the counterparty when the public figure's behavior in his or her private life reflects negatively on the brand they are chosen to represent by allowing the offended party to terminate an agreement. While currently atypical in restaurant industry contracts, a morals clause could allow a restaurateur to cancel the contract if the owner or CEO of a landlord's operation makes inflammatory statements or engages in disreputable behavior with which the restaurateur wants no association.

In recent news, Brian Williams's morals clause in his contract with NBC affected the network's consideration of his inaccurate representations. NBC's clause says: "If an artist commits any act or becomes involved in any situation or occurrence, which brings artist into public disrepute, contempt, scandal or ridicule, or which justifiably shocks, insults or offends a significant portion of the community or if publicity is given to any such conduct ... the company shall have the right to terminate." Although NBC ultimately determined that suspension was the appropriate punishment, morals clauses are frequently enforced via termination of a contract. Tiger Woods lost several lucrative endorsement deals, including Gillette, in the wake of the public learning about his marital infidelity; many of Los Angeles Laker guard Kobe Bryant's sponsorships, including McDonald's, were not renewed after he was charged with rape; Kate Moss' cocaine habit cost her the H&M endorsement; and Michael Phelps was kicked off the Wheaties box when the news reported that he had been photographed smoking marijuana. In the Trump cases against Andres and Zakarian, a morals clause would give each of the restaurateurs the opportunity to abandon the contract on the legal grounds that Trump had breached the morals clause by making his offensive remarks.

Another contractual clause that could provide restaurateurs an exit from an agreement is a nondisparagement clause, which would restrain a party from making statements or engaging in actions that negatively impact the restaurateur's reputation, products, services, management or employees. Most often appearing in settlement agreements and executive employment agreements, nondisparagement clauses are a powerful method of protecting a restaurant or restaurateur's reputation. Unlike morals clauses, which typically define the prohibited conduct very specifically, nondisparagement clauses typically define the triggering statements in more general terms. In the event of dispute, this could create the potential for freedom of speech and First Amendment arguments, which are beyond the scope of this article. But one recent dispute highlights how restaurant owners may use a nondisparagement clause to protect their businesses.

In Conant v. Alto 53 LLC, 880 N.Y.S.2d 223 (N.Y. Sup. Dec. 10, 2008), Scott Conant, the former executive chef at two Manhattan restaurants, L'Impero and Alto, was accused of violating the nondisparagement clause of the separation agreement that he signed when he parted ways with the his former business partner, Christopher Cannon and the Alto 53 restaurant group, to open his new restaurant, Scarpetta, in the meatpacking district of Manhattan. The separation agreement provided for a payout to Conant for his ownership in the L'Impero and Alto restaurants, and included a broad nondisparagement clause in which the parties mutually agreed not to "denigrate, disparage, criticize, defame or make any false or derogatory statements ... including without limitation any statement, oral or written, which portrays the other in an unfavorable light or subjects it to scorn, obloquy or ridicule or which would in any way adversely reflect upon or affect the party's goodwill or business reputation, or reflect upon the legal liability or responsibility with respect to the separation." Id. at *1. Cannon claimed that Conant breached the clause by calling the operation "highly frenetic and almost spastic" in interviews about his split with the group that appeared in The New York Observer, New York Restaurant Insider and The New York Post, among other publications. Cannon claimed that these comments terminated the separation agreement and relieved Cannon of his contractual obligation to make any further payments to Conant. Id. at *4. While the court did not have enough factual information to make a final determination about whether the statements constituted a breach of this nondisparagement clause, it did advise that for the statements to constitute a material breach justifying termination of further contractual obligations, Cannon would have to show that he had suffered economic damage as a result of Conant's statements. Id. at *9. In theory, if Andres or Zakarian could show that they suffered a consequential financial loss from Trump's public statements about Mexican immigrants because, for instance, all Mexican restaurant workers went on strike or refused to carry out their contracts as a result of Trump's comments, they would have strong arguments for terminating the contract with Trump under a nondisparagement clause.

Finally, there are other practical ways in which businesses and people in the public eye can protect themselves. Even if neither of these types of clauses were present in the contracts for the restaurants at the Old Post Office Building, the parties could have included some type of simple agreement to coordinate all press releases and public statements that could affect the business. Of course, as the Trump examples show, there may be public statements or actions that are so notorious or provocative that they effectively force the issue, regardless of what contract protections exist. Whenever chefs or their investors enter the celebrity realm, they may want to consider borrowing legal concepts and protections developed in the world of entertainment. Entertainment law firms are adept at negotiating morals clauses, nondisparagement clauses and simple agreements to coordinate public statements. Such protections are increasingly vital to avoiding the devastating effect that notorious public comments can have on the success of expensive and high-profile restaurant business ventures.

Previously published by Law 360, New York.


This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Toby Butterfield
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions