United States: District Court Grants Evidentiary Hearing In Dispute Over IRS Use Of Private Firm In Microsoft Audit

On June 17, 2015, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington granted Microsoft Corporation an evidentiary hearing on whether the IRS' use of lawyers from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP in the summons process was lawful.38 The IRS has been auditing Microsoft's transfer pricing arrangements from the company's 2004 to 2006 tax returns, and seeking to enforce the related summonses in United States v. Microsoft Corp. et al.39

What began as a routine IRS audit of Microsoft's cost-sharing arrangements with affiliates soon became a case full of rare happenings: the first time the IRS has hired a  private law firm to aid in the audit process, and one of the rare instances where a District Court has granted an evidentiary hearing in a summons enforcement proceeding. The IRS contracted for Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP to help in its Microsoft  audit, relying on the temporary regulations it issued in June 2014. Microsoft challenged both that contract and the validity of the regulation that permitted it. US District Judge  Ricardo S. Martinez found that Microsoft had carried its burden for an evidentiary  hearing, distinguishing this case from prior ones where hearings had been denied. On  July 17, 2015, Judge Martinez also denied the Government's motion to exclude witnesses, allowing Microsoft's attorneys to testify at the hearing and agreeing with the company that an evidentiary hearing is not a trial.

Timeline of Events

The saga started in 2007, when the IRS began investigating Microsoft's activities from 2004 to 2006. The IRS audit focused on two of the company's cost-sharing  arrangements, one with Microsoft affiliates in Puerto Rico and another with affiliates in Asia, a process that continued over the next seven years. The fact gathering had been  done by just the agency thus far, but on June 9, 2014, the Treasury and the IRS issued a "temporary regulation" without notice and comment that would allow third-party contractors like private law firms to "receive books, papers, records or other data  summoned by the IRS and take testimony of a person who the IRS has summoned as a witness to provide testimony under oath."40

Based on this temporary regulation, the IRS entered into a $2,185,500 contract with Quinn Emanuel for help on the audit of the Puerto Rico arrangement, which included  services such as analysis of issues, identification of any further documents needed and participation in interviews. Quinn Emanuel's involvement allegedly did not begin until  July 15, 2014, however, the IRS did not inform Microsoft it had retained private civil  litigators for the audit until August 28, 2014. Quinn Emanuel attorneys were present at  interviews, reviewed documents and independently assessed the Puerto Rico  arrangement from September to October 2014.

On October 30, 2014, the IRS issued a summons to Microsoft pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 7602 and 6503(j), followed by filed petitions in the District Court for the  Western District of Washington to enforce those summonses beginning in  December 2014. After finding that the IRS had made the requisite initial showing for  enforcement, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause to Microsoft. Microsoft responded  by filing motions seeking an evidentiary hearing, alleging IRS abuse of process in  contracting the audit out to a private law firm, and that discovery is therefore warranted  prior to the Court's decision on summonses enforcement. Microsoft also filed Freedom of  Information Act ("FOIA") requests in the meantime for documents relating to the IRS's  retention of Quinn Emanuel.

Legal Background and Issues

The crux of this case is whether the IRS can retain outside private attorneys in an audit,  and whether the temporary regulation it relied upon to do so was valid. The IRS acted  well within the law when it brought an enforcement action. See 26 U.S.C. § 7604(b). Once  the court has found that the IRS has made a prima facie case, the burden shifts to the  taxpayer to show that enforcement of the summons would result in an abuse of the  court's process. United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 58 (1964). However, in such  enforcement proceedings, the court is limited to deciding only whether the IRS issued the  summons in good faith and without improper purpose.41  Taxpayers are also entitled to a  pre-enforcement evidentiary hearing if they can point to "specific facts or circumstances  plausibly raising an inference of bad faith" or of another "appropriate ground" to defeat  the summons, a threshold showing that can be satisfied via circumstantial evidence.42

Microsoft made two arguments in support of an evidentiary hearing: first, that the IRS, in  hiring a private law firm to conduct audit interviews, improperly outsourced an  inherently governmental function and thus abuses court process; and second, the facts  and circumstances of how Quinn Emanuel was retained raised a "plausible inference"  that the IRS may have also improperly delegated other aspects of the tax audit to the firm.  The company also asserts that this is the first time that the IRS has retained private civil  litigators in a US income tax audit, and that while the contract covers four non-severable  phases for the firm's services, only the first phase is detailed.

The IRS countered that whether the outsourcing was improper or not is a legal question,  and not one requiring factual discovery. The hiring of Quinn Emanuel was also one fully  supported by law, and challenges the idea that the circumstances raised any inference of  impropriety.

Circumstantial Evidence Deemed Sufficient

In ruling for Microsoft, Judge Martinez distinguished the present case from past denials  for hearings because Microsoft had carried its burden to trigger an evidentiary hearing:  Microsoft was able to point to specific circumstances from which the court could infer  that the temporary regulation was invalid; and the company was also able to point to facts  and circumstances raising an "inference of impropriety."43

According to the court, while the IRS was correct in saying that the challenge to the  validity of the temporary regulation was a question of law, the challenge itself raises  questions of fact that may warrant discovery.44 Whether the temporary regulation  expanding the parties able to assist in tax audits is valid could then turn on the facts: the  regulation might be one that the IRS could issue without notice and comment  procedures, as listed in 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(3); the regulation might be found arbitrary and capricious—and therefore invalid—because it could not be reconciled with the plain language of the IRC.

In addition, the court found that Microsoft was able to point to sufficient facts and circumstances "plausibly raising an inference of impropriety." In support of its allegation  that the IRS was improperly delegating government functions in the audit, Microsoft showed language in the contract that could suggest the firm was inspecting books and taking testimony, activities that are statutorily limited to the Government alone. Microsoft also alleged that the IRS retained Quinn Emanuel before the temporary regulations were issued, raising an inference that the firm played a larger role in the  issuance of summonses and information documents requests and had access to confidential taxpayer information in violation of the Code.45

Evidentiary Hearing is Not a Trial

Exactly one month after his order granting an evidentiary hearing, Judge Martinez also allowed Microsoft's attorneys to participate as witnesses in the same trial in which they were also advocates, denying the IRS's motion to exclude. Microsoft had sought to allow their attorneys to testify about IRS' contract, a move the IRS said was barred by Washington's rules of professional conduct—rules that forbade attorneys from being both witnesses and advocates at the same trial.

Judge Martinez once again sided with Microsoft, saying that while the state rules of professional conduct did apply in District Court, the attorneys' testimonies would not  violate them because an evidentiary hearing was not a trial. After the court's decision, Microsoft said that the attorneys would be acting only as witnesses for the hearing, with other attorneys taking on their former roles as advocates.

The IRS retaining outside counsel for a tax audit is an unprecedented move, and while grants for evidentiary hearings are rare, the unique circumstances of this case may have  affected the decision. The evidentiary hearing is scheduled for August 25, 2015.

Footnotes

38 United States v. Microsoft Corp. et al, No. 2:15-cv-00102 (W.D. Wa., June 17, 2015).

39 See United States v. Microsoft Corp. et al No. 2:15-cv-00102 (W.D. Wa. filed Dec. 11, 2014); No. 2:15-cv-00103 (W.D. Wa. filed Dec. 19, 2014).

40 See 79 Fed. Reg. 34,625 (June 18, 2014); 26 C.F.R. § 301.7602-1T(b)(3).

41 See United States v. Clarke, __ U.S. __, 134 S.Ct. 2361, 2367 (2014) (quoting United States v. Stuart, 489 U.S. 353, 369 (1989)).

42 Id.

43 Microsoft filed a supplemental brief regarding the recent Tax Court decision in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, 145 T.C. No. 3 (2015). According to Microsoft, the Altera decision is relevant to its claim that enforcing the IRS summonses would be an abuse of the court's process.

44 Prior to the temporary regulation, the Internal Revenue Code allows only the Secretary or any duly authorized "officer, employee or agency of the Treasury Department" to examine documents, issue summons or take testimony under oath to investigate tax liability. See 26 U.S.C. § 7602(a)(1)-(3); § 7701(a)(11)(B), (a)(12)(A)(i).

45 See 26 U.S.C. § 6103.

Written with the help of Eva Yung, a summer associate at Shearman and Sterling LLP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions