United States: AML Requirements Proposed For SEC Registered Advisers

Last Updated: September 9 2015
Article by Charles Horn and Ignacio A. Sandoval


On August 25, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the US Department of the Treasury (Treasury), published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to impose anti-money laundering (AML) programs and additional reporting requirements on investment advisers registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).1

FinCEN's proposal would require registered investment advisers to have anti-money laundering programs in place, file suspicious activity reports, and comply with additional reporting requirements. The proposal furthers the United States' efforts to comply with international AML standards and recommendations.

If adopted, the NPRM would do the following:

  1. Require that SEC-registered investment advisers (RIAs) develop and maintain written AML programs reasonably designed to prevent the RIA from being used for money laundering and terrorist financing and to achieve compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).2
  2. Include RIAs within the meaning of a "financial institutions" for purposes of the BSA's implementing regulations3 and impose specific reporting requirements.
  3. Require that RIAs monitor for suspicious activity and file suspicious activity reports (SARs) with FinCEN.
  4. Delegate examination authority for compliance to the SEC.4

The long-awaited NPRM comes as the United States is due to undergo in 2016 a mutual evaluation by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the inter-governmental body that promotes international AML standards.5 In FATF's previous evaluation of the United States, it noted (among other things) the lack of AML and CIP requirements applicable to investment advisers in the United States.6

If adopted as proposed, the rules would require RIAs to establish AML programs and begin to file SARs within six months of their effective date. Comments on the NPRM are due on or before November 2, 2015.


The BSA, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act (Patriot Act),7 establishes the framework for AML obligations imposed on US financial institutions. The BSA provides Treasury with the authority to implement, administer, and enforce compliance with the BSA and implement regulations to that effect. This authority has been delegated to FinCEN. While broker-dealers in securities and investment companies have been subject to AML requirements for some time due in part to their being included within the definition of a "financial institution" under the BSA,8 investment advisers are not included in that definition. As a result, most of the BSA's substantive requirements are not directly applicable to investment advisers unless Treasury exercises its discretionary authority to include them within the definition.9 While FinCEN had previously proposed AML requirements for investment advisers in 200310 and unregistered investment companies (i.e., private funds) in 2002,11 FinCEN withdrew those proposals in 2007.12 At the time of withdrawal FinCEN noted that, since investment advisers conduct their activities through financial institutions that are subject to the BSA, investment adviser activities are at least indirectly subject to BSA requirements.


For purposes of the BSA's implementing regulations, the NPRM would define an "investment adviser" as "[a]ny person who is registered or required to be registered with the SEC under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940."13 FinCEN indicated that the proposed definition of investment adviser would capture both primary advisers and subadvisers. In addition, FinCEN indicated that the following types of advisers may be within scope:

(i) dually-registered investment advisers, and advisers that are affiliated with or subsidiaries of entities required to establish AML programs;

(ii) certain non-U.S. investment advisers;

(iii) investment advisers to registered investment companies;

(iv) financial planners;

(v) pension consultants; and

(vi) entities that provide only securities newsletters and/or research reports.

The inclusion of RIAs within the definition of a financial institution for purposes of the BSA's implementing regulations would require RIAs to comply with the BSA regulatory requirements that are generally applicable to financial institutions, including the information sharing provisions of Section 314(a) of the Patriot Act, the currency transaction report (CTR) requirements,14 the recordkeeping and travel rule (subject to certain exceptions),15 and the requirement to create and retain records for extensions of credit and cross-border transfers of currency, monetary instruments, checks, investment securities, and credit when transactions exceed $10,000.16



Proposed rule 31 C.F.R. 1010.210 (the Proposed AML Rule) would require RIAs to develop and implement an AML program reasonably designed to prevent the RIA from being used to facilitate money laundering or the financing of terrorist activities and to achieve and monitor compliance with applicable BSA provisions and implementing regulations. The Proposed AML Rule requires that each RIA's AML program be approved in writing by its board of directors or trustees, or if it does not have a board, by its sole proprietor, general partner, trustee, or other persons who have similar functions to a board of directors.

Minimum Requirements

Under the Proposed AML Rules, an RIA's AML program must, at a minimum, do the following:

  1. Establish and implement policies, procedures, and internal controls reasonably designed to prevent the investment adviser from being used for money laundering or the financing of terrorist activities and to achieve and monitor compliance with the applicable provisions of the BSA and its implementing regulations.
  2. Provide for independent testing for compliance to be conducted by the investment adviser's personnel or by a qualified outside party.
  3. Designate a person or persons responsible for implementing and monitoring the operations and internal controls of the program.
  4. Provide ongoing training for appropriate persons.

These minimum requirements are substantively the same as the AML program requirements that apply to other classes of regulated financial institutions, including banks, broker-dealers, and registered investment funds. As mentioned in the NPRM, the AML program requirement is not "one-size-fits all." Rather, it requires a risk-based approach that provides RIAs with flexibility in designing their programs to meet the specific risks presented by the advisory services they provide, as well as their client base. FinCEN, however, emphasizes its expectation that an RIA's AML program will cover all of its advisory activities (including activity that does not entail the management of client assets) whether the RIA is the primary adviser or the subadviser.

Dually Registered RIAs and Enterprise-Wide Programs

In discussing the AML program requirement, FinCEN indicated that RIAs that are dually registered as broker-dealers would not have to implement a separate AML program, but rather could rely on a comprehensive program that covers both the advisory and brokerage functions of the dual-registrant. Similarly, an RIA affiliated with, or a subsidiary of, an entity required to establish an AML program in another capacity would not have to implement multiple or separate programs as long as the program covers all of the entity's activities and businesses that are subject to the BSA.

Contractual Delegation

FinCEN indicates that an RIA may delegate the implementation and operation of aspects of its AML program to another financial institution, agent, third-party service provider, or other entity. FinCEN makes clear, however, that the RIA would remain fully responsible for the effectiveness of the AML program and for ensuring that FinCEN and the SEC are able to obtain information and records relating to the program.


The NPRM would also require that RIAs monitor for suspicious activities and file SARs. Under proposed rule 31 C.F.R. 1031.320 (Proposed SAR Rule), an RIA would be required to file a SAR with FinCEN if a transaction is conducted or attempted by, at, or through an RIA and involves funds or other assets of at least $5,000 and the RIA knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect that the transaction (or pattern of transactions of which the transaction is a part):

  1. Involves funds derived from illegal activity or is intended or conducted in order to hide or disguise funds or assets derived from illegal activity (including, without limitation, the ownership, nature, source, location, or control of such funds or assets) as part of a plan to violate or evade any Federal law or regulation or to avoid any transaction reporting requirement under Federal law or regulation;
  2. Is designed, whether through structuring or other means, to evade any requirements of 31 C.F.R Chapter X or any other regulations promulgated under the BSA;
  3. Has no business or apparent lawful purpose or is not the sort in which the particular customer would normally be expected to engage, and the investment adviser knows of no reasonable explanation for the transaction after examining the available facts, including the background and possible purpose of the transaction; or
  4. Involves use of the investment adviser to facilitate criminal activity.

FinCEN stated that whether a SAR should be filed depends on all the facts and circumstances related to the transaction and the client in question. In this regard, FinCEN identified the following non-exclusive "red flags" that could be observed by an RIA and that may merit further investigation to determine whether a SAR should be filed:

  • A client exhibits an unusual concern regarding the RIA's compliance with government reporting requirements or is reluctant or refuses to reveal any information concerning business activities, or furnishes unusual or suspicious identification or business documents;
  • A client appears to be acting as the agent for another entity but declines, evades, or is reluctant to provide any information in response to questions about that entity;
  • A client's account has a pattern of inexplicable and unusual withdrawals, contrary to the client's stated investment objectives;
  • A client requests that a transaction be processed in such a manner as to avoid the adviser's normal documentation requirements;
  • A client exhibits a total lack of concern regarding performance returns or risk;
  • A client's use of money orders or travelers checks in the context of private funds; or
  • Use of multiple wire transfers from different accounts at different financial institutions or other unusual wire activity.

Joint Filings

In situations where multiple RIAs or financial institutions with SAR filing obligations are involved, as with SAR rules applicable to other financial institutions, the Proposed SAR Rule would permit joint filings.

Filing and Notification Procedures

The Proposed SAR Rule would require that a SAR be filed no later than 30 calendar days after the date of initial detection by the RIA that may constitute a basis for filing a SAR, with an additional 30 calendar day delay built in for an RIA to identify a suspect. In addition to filing a SAR, if a matter violation involves immediate attention (e.g., terrorist financing or ongoing money laundering schemes), the Proposed SAR Rule requires an RIA to also notify appropriate law enforcement by telephone. Under the Proposed SAR Rule, supporting documentation relating to each SAR would have to be collected and maintained separately by an RIA and made available upon request to FinCEN; Federal, state, or local law enforcement; or any Federal regulatory authority (e.g., the SEC).

Retention of Records

An RIA would have to maintain copies of filed SARs and supporting documentation for a period of five years from the date of filing.


SARs are highly confidential, and the Proposed SAR Rule would prohibit disclosure of a SAR (or information that would reveal the existence of a SAR) except under very limited circumstances. In instances where an RIA or personnel are subpoenaed or otherwise requested to disclose a SAR or reveal information that would disclose the existence of a SAR, an RIA would have to decline to produce the SAR (or such information) and notify FinCEN. The Proposed SAR Rule contains certain rules of construction that permit limited disclosure of SARs (or information that would reveal the existence of a SAR) and underlying facts and documents. A third rule of construction would permit the

sharing by an investment adviser, or any director, officer, employee, or agent of the investment adviser, of a SAR, or any information that would reveal the existence of a SAR, within the investment adviser's corporate organizational structure for purposes consistent with Title II of the Bank Secrecy Act as determined by regulation or in guidance (emphasis added).17

While this provision would initially appear to permit an RIA to share a SAR within its organizational structures, that permission is conditioned on there being guidance or regulation that permit such sharing. While there is guidance that permits financial institutions to share SARs within their corporate organizational structure,18 FinCEN specifically declined to permit RIAs to engage in such sharing and instead, requested comment on this issue.19

Limitation on Liability

The Proposed SAR Rule would limit an RIA and its personnel's liability in connection with filing SARs.


Finally, FinCEN proposes to delegate its examination authority to the SEC. The SEC currently has delegated authority to examine broker-dealers and investment companies with their respective obligations under the BSA and its implementing regulations.


In light of FATF's upcoming evaluation of the United States and the weaknesses with respect to investment advisers identified in the United States' last mutual evaluation in 2006, the Proposed AML Rule is likely to be adopted without much, if any, modification. As noted by FinCEN, many RIAs already have AML compliance programs in place in connection with a series of no-action letters issued by the SEC staff regarding a broker-dealer's CIP obligations.20 These letters have permitted a broker-dealer in securities to rely on RIAs to perform some or all aspects of the broker-dealer's CIP obligation subject to certain conditions, including that the RIA have an AML and CIP program in place. In addition, many RIAs have voluntarily instituted AML programs as a best practice or because certain counterparties require them. For such RIAs, compliance with the Proposed AML Rule should not necessarily impose additional substantial burdens.

RIAs that do not have AML programs in place may want to consider building the appropriate infrastructure in anticipation of a final rule. RIAs without programs may find useful an AML program template provided by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) for use by its smaller brokerdealer members.21 While the FINRA Small Firm Template may be a helpful starting point, RIAs should be mindful that AML programs will need to be tailored to account for the risks associated with a firm's specific business and its clients. Further, all RIAs may find it helpful to review guidance from the federal banking regulators22 regarding compliance with the BSA, literature from FATF regarding money laundering and terrorist financing in the securities industry,23 as well as commentary from FinCEN in the NPRM regarding the expected scope of an RIA's AML program as well as the risk profile of certain advisory clients.24 In this regard, FinCEN placed particular emphasis on those advisory services that may present higher risks, such as advisory activities in connection with private funds and other unregistered pooled investment vehicles.25 In addition, these resources identify "red flags" that could be useful with respect to compliance with the Proposed SAR Rule.

While the Proposed SAR Rule is generally consistent with similar SAR rules applicable to other financial institutions, the prohibition on sharing within a corporate organizational structure can present logistical challenges if such sharing is not permitted when the final rule is adopted. As mentioned above, other financial institutions are permitted to share SARs within their corporate organizational structures,26 and the prohibition as applied to RIAs may cause interpretive difficulties with respect to joint filings and could otherwise hamper the effectiveness of an enterprise-wide AML program.

Notably, FinCEN has made the intentional decision (for the time being) to limit the applicability of the Proposed AML Rule and Proposed SAR Rule to federally-registered investment advisers and to exclude state-registered investment advisers, and to not require RIAs to establish and maintain a formal CIP. These exclusions, however, may be relatively short-lived inasmuch as FinCEN stated in the NPRM that it would consider whether to extend the AML, SAR, and related reporting requirements to state-registered advisers, and that it expected to address the CIP issue in a future joint rulemaking with the SEC. In any event, the absence of a formal CIP requirement would not relieve RIAs from their risk-based customer due diligence obligations.

Based on the definition of "investment adviser" in the proposed rules, exempt reporting advisers (ERAs) should not be subject to the Proposed AML Rule and Proposed SAR Rule because these advisers are exempt (i.e., not required to register) from the SEC's registration requirements.27 Similarly, a foreign private adviser as defined in Section 202(a)(30)28 of the Advisers Act is exempt from SEC registration and therefore should also not be within scope for purposes of Proposed AML Rule and the Proposed SAR Rule. That said, there may still be some interpretive questions that FinCEN may have to address with respect to investment advisers that rely on SEC no-action letters in connection with their registration requirements. For instance, relying advisers are advisers that rely on the investment adviser registration of a related entity pursuant to SEC no-action relief.29 Because these advisers are relying on another entity's registration and are not directly registered with the SEC, it is unclear whether they would be deemed RIAs for purposes of FinCEN's proposed rules. Another interpretive issue that FinCEN may have to address involves SEC registered foreign advisers operating under the "Regulation Lite" regime in reliance on an SEC no-action letter.30 Under guidance issued to the American Bar Association Subcommittee on Private Investment Companies, an SEC-registered foreign adviser could avoid applying the entirety of the Advisers Act's substantive requirements to their non-U.S. clients. Because foreign advisers relying on that letter are SEC-registered, they would presumably be subject to the Proposed AML Rule and the Proposed SAR Rule. Unlike the relief provided in the SEC's no-action letter, and absent additional guidance from FinCEN, these advisers may have to apply the entirety of FinCEN's proposed rules to their U.S. and non- U.S. clients in light of FinCEN's view that the proposed rules should apply to all of an RIA's advisory activities.

Finally, we note that while FinCEN proposes to delegate examination authority over an RIAs compliance to the SEC, this is not the same as delegation of enforcement authority. While the SEC has brought enforcement actions against broker-dealers for failing to file SARs31 and for having an inadequate CIP,32 the SEC's enforcement authority is limited to recordkeeping and reporting violations under Rule 17a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).33 We are not aware of any case brought by the SEC against a broker-dealer or mutual fund that alleges a direct violation of the BSA's implementing regulations.34 It is unclear whether the SEC will seek to implement a rule similar to Exchange Act Rule 17a-8 applicable to RIAs in order to enforce some of the proposed rules' requirements or whether all potential violations uncovered during an examination will be referred to FinCEN for enforcement. Given the significant number of RIAs—approximately 11,235 as of June 2, 2014 according to FinCEN—it is also unclear whether the SEC and FinCEN will have the resources to meaningfully examine and enforce the proposed rules' requirements once they are final.


1 FinCEN, Anti-Money Laundering Program and Suspicious Activity Report Filing Requirements for Registered Investment Advisers, 80 Fed. Reg. 52680 (Sept. 1, 2015) (NPRM) available at gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-01/pdf/2015-21318.pdf.

2 Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970 (commonly referred to as the BSA), 12 U.S.C. § 1829b, 12 U.S.C. §§ 1951-1959, and 31 U.S.C. §§ 5311-5330.

3 The BSA's implementing regulations are located at 31 C.F.R. Chapter X.

4 At this time, FinCEN is not proposing customer identification program (CIP) requirements on RIAs or the expanded beneficial ownership due diligence requirements that it proposed on July 30, 2014. For information about the due diligence proposal, please see our August 2014 LawFlash on this topic, "FINCEN Proposes to Expand Financial Institution Customers Due Diligence Requirements," available at morganlewis.com/pubs/fs_lf_fincenproposesexpandedcustomerduediligencereqs_05aug14.

5 FATF, Global Assessments Calendar (July 2015) available at fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/assessments/Global-assessmentcalendar.pdf.

6 See FATF, Third Mutual Evaluation Report on Anti-Money Laundering And Combating The Financing Of Terrorism, United States (June 23, 2006), available at fatf-gafi.org/countries/u-z/unitedstates/documents/mutualevaluationoftheunitedstates.html.

7 Pub. L. No. 107-56, 115 Stat. 296 (2001).

8 See 31 U.S.C. § 5312(a)(2) and (c)(1).

9 See 31 U.S.C. § 5312(a)(2)(Y)(defining a financial institution to include, among others, "any business or agency which engages in any activity which the Secretary of the Treasury determines, by regulation, to be an activity which is similar to, related to, or a substitute for any activity in which any business described in this paragraph is authorized to engage.").

10 See Anti-Money Laundering Programs for Investment Advisers, 68 Fed. Reg. 23646 (May 5, 2003).

11 See Anti-Money Laundering Programs for Unregistered Investment Companies, 67 Fed. Reg. 60617 (Sept. 26, 2002).

12 See Withdrawal of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Anti-Money Laundering Programs for Unregistered Investment Companies, 73 Fed. Reg. 65569 (Nov. 4, 2008); and Withdrawal of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Anti-Money Laundering Programs for Investment Advisers, 73 Fed. Reg. 65568 (Nov. 4, 2008).

13 See Proposed Rule 31 C.F.R. 1010.100(nnn).

14 See 31 C.F.R. 1010.310 through 1010.314. The CTR requirement would replace an RIA's obligation to file reports on Form 8300 for the receipt of more than $10,000 in cash and negotiable instruments. See, e.g., 31 CFR 1010.330.

15 31 C.F.R. 1010.410 and 1010.430. These rules require financial institutions to create and maintain records of transmittals of funds and ensure that certain information pertaining to the transmittal of funds "travel" with the transmittal to the next financial institution in a payment chain.

16 31 C.F.R. 1010.410(a)-(c).

17 See Proposed Rule 31 C.F.R. 1031.320(d)(1)(ii)(B).

18 See, e.g., Sharing Suspicious Activity Reports by Securities Broker-Dealers, Mutual Funds, Futures Commission Merchants, and Introducing Brokers in Commodities with Certain U.S. Affiliates, FIN-2010- G005 (Nov. 23, 2010) and Sharing Suspicious Activity Reports by Depository Institutions with Certain U.S. Affiliates, FIN-2010-G006 (Nov. 23, 2010).

19 See NPRM, 80 Fed. Reg. at 52690.

20 See, Request for No-Action Relief Under Broker-Dealer Customer Identification Rule (31 C.F R. 1023.220) (Jan. 9, 2015), which is the most recent of this series of letters, available at sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mr-noaction/2015/sifma-010915-17a8.pdf.

21 FINRA's small firm template (FINRA Small Firm Template), available at finra.org/industry/anti-money-laundering-template-smallfirms.

22 See Bank Secrecy Act Anti-Money Laundering Examination Manual, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (April 1, 2014), available at occ.gov/publications/publications-by-type/other-publications-reports/ffiec-bsa-aml-examination-manual.pdf.

23 See FATF, Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing in the Securities Sector (October 2009), available at fatfgafi. org/media/fatf/documents/reports/ML%20and%20TF%20in%20the%20Securities20Sector.pdf.

24 NPRM, 80 Fed. Reg. at 52687-88.

25 Id.

26 See supra note 18.

27 ERAs include investment advisers relying on either the "Private Fund Adviser Exemption" or the "Venture Capital Fund Adviser Exemption". More specifically, section 203(m) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act) and Rule 203(m)-1 thereunder exempt from registration an investment adviser who only provides investment advice to private funds and has assets under management in the U.S. of less than $150 million. Section 203(l) of the Advisers Act and Rule 203(l)-l thereunder exempts from registration an investment adviser providing advice to one or more venture capital funds. While not subject to registration, ERAs are required to make certain filings with the SEC.

28 A foreign private adviser is generally defined as an investment adviser that (1) has no place of business in the United States, (2) has, in total, fewer than 15 clients and investors in the United States in private funds advised by the adviser, (3) has less than $25 million in assets under management attributable to clients in the United States and investors in the United States in private funds advised by the adviser (or such higher amount permitted by the SEC through rule), and (4) neither holds itself out generally to the public in the U.S. as an investment adviser nor acts as an investment adviser to any registered investment company or as a business development company.

29 See American Bar Association, Business Law Section, SEC No-Action Letter (Jan. 18, 2012), available at sec.gov/divisions/investment/noaction/2012/aba011812.htm.

30 See American Bar Association Subcommittee on Private Investment Companies, SEC No-Action Letter (Aug. 19, 2006).

31 See, e.g., In the matter of Ronald S. Bloomfield, Robert Georgia, Victor Labi, John Earl Martin, Sr., and Eugene Miller, Exchange Act Release No. 61988 (April 27, 2010), available at sec.gov/litigation/admin/2010/33-9121.pdf.

32 See, e.g., In the Matter of Pinnacle Capital Markets, LLC and Michael A. Paciorek, Exchange Act Release No. 62811 (September 1, 2010) available at sec.gov/litigation/admin/2010/34-62811.pdf.

33 31 C.F.R. 240.17a-8.

34 Unlike the SEC, FINRA has a broader ability to bring enforcement actions against broker-dealers for BSA-related violations because the broker-dealer AML rule specifically contemplates that self-regulatory organizations can have rules requiring their members to comply with the BSA's implementing regulations. See 31 C.F.R. 1030.210 (generally indicating that a broker-dealer will be deemed to satisfy the requirements of the BSA's AML program requirement if the broker-dealer, among other things, implements and maintains an AML program that complies with SRO rules); see also FINRA Rule 3310 (Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Program).

This article is provided as a general informational service and it should not be construed as imparting legal advice on any specific matter.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions