European Union: Bank Resolution: English And German Courts Place Limits On Obligations To Give Effect To Actions Of Resolution Authorities In Other Member States

In two recent decisions, European national courts have taken a narrow view of their obligations under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD)—the new European framework for dealing with distressed banks. The message from both the English and the German courts was that resolution authorities must adhere strictly to the terms of the BRRD; otherwise, measures that they take in relation to distressed banks may not be given effect in other Member States.

Goldman Sachs International v Novo Banco SA

In August 2014, the Bank of Portugal announced the resolution of Banco Espírito Santo (BES), what at the time was Portugal's second largest bank. That announcement followed the July disclosure of massive losses at BES, which compounded a picture of serious irregularities within the bank that had been developing for several months. As part of the resolution, BES's healthy assets and most of its liabilities were transferred to a new bridge bank, Novo Banco (the so-called "good bank"), which received €4.9 billion of rescue funds—while troubled assets and "Excluded Liabilities," categories specifically identified in the BRRD, remained at BES (the "bad bank"). Amongst those liabilities initially deemed to have transferred to Novo Banco in August was a USD $835 million loan made to BES via a Goldman Sachs-formed vehicle, Oak Finance.

In December 2014, the Bank of Portugal issued a further decision stating that the loan had not in fact been transferred to Novo Banco, but rather remained at BES. In response, Goldman Sachs, together with a group of funds that had participated in the loan,  commenced proceedings in the English court (the loan being subject to English law and jurisdiction) claiming repayment of the debt from Novo Banco. 1

Novo Banco, in turn, asked the court to dismiss the Goldman Sachs proceedings for lack of jurisdiction (or alternatively for a stay pending a decision of the Portuguese court in related proceedings). Novo Banco argued that the English court had no right to continue the proceedings because the effect of the December decision had been to transfer the loan back to BES, such that Novo Banco ceased being a party to the Oak Finance loan at all.

On August 7, 2015, the English High Court denied Novo Banco's preliminary application. In confirming its right to continue the proceedings, the English court made several interesting findings, including:

  • The Goldman Sachs proceedings are a claim on a debt and not a challenge to the decision of a resolution authority of another Member State. The fact that the proceedings may represent, in effect, a challenge to a decision by the Portuguese resolution authority does not mean that the English court should refuse to hear them.
  • The BRRD explicitly requires that "transfers" made in the context of bank resolutions administered in any Member State are given effect in all other Member States, including any re-transfer of assets and/or liabilities from the bridge institution back to the original bank. The December decision, however, did not claim to be a "re-transfer" of the loan to BES. Instead, it stated that "the liability...was not transferred to Novo Banco" an d that the decision was effective as of August 3, 2014. In addition, the Bank of Portugal did not definitively state that the loan is an Excluded Liability, but only that there are serious and well-grounded reasons to so conclude. The court's view was that the December decision, therefore, was not one to which the English court was obliged to give effect within the terms of the BRRD, as, among other things, it technically failed to provide for a transfer or a re-transfer. Novo Banco's submission that the December decision involved the exercise of powers implicitly provided for in the BRRD was rejected on the basis that the BRRD explicitly lists the r esolution authorities' powers, and the December decision (seeking to clarify that certain transfers that initially had been made had not in fact been made) was not an exercise of one of those powers.
  • The court also rejected the submission that it was obliged to give effect to the December decision on the basis of common law authority on universal succession.
  • The judge expressed a preliminary view that the loan is not an Excluded Liability and, therefore, is a liability of Novo Banco. He recognized, however, that Novo Banco had not sought, in the context of its preliminary application, to address this issue.

These proceedings are now set to continue in parallel with the challenge to the December decision commenced by Goldman Sachs and the other loan participants before the Portuguese courts.

Bayerische Landesbank v Heta Asset Resolution

Three months earlier, a similar approach was taken by the regional Court of Munich in the case between Bayerische Landesbank (Bayern LB) and Heta Asset Resolution AG (Heta).

Heta is the "bad bank" that was established as a wind-down vehicle to assume and manage large parts of the failed Austrian bank, Hypo Alpe Adria. Heta is 100% owned by the Republic of Austria. In March 2015, the Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA) issued a 15-month moratorium on liabilities owed by Heta, including in relation to the disputed claims of Bayern LB against Heta, purportedly in the exercise of its authority under Austria's implementation of the BRRD, the Federal Act on the Recovery and Resolution of Banks (BaSAG).2

One of the legal issues before the Munich court was whether the BRRD contemplates the application of its tools and powers to wind-down vehicles such as Heta. The uncertainty stemmed from the fact that the BRRD only applies to MiFID firms and credit institutions within the meaning of the Capital Requirements Regulation – in other words, banks. Heta, however, no longer had a banking license. In order to ensure that the BRRD would apply to Heta nonetheless, the Austrian legislature explicitly made Heta subject to BaSAG. On May 8, 2015, the Munich court of first instance refused to recognize the moratorium on the basis that the application of BaSAG to Heta goes beyond the scope of the BRRD and, therefore, fell outside of Germany's obligation under the BRRD to give effect to measures taken by other resolution authorities. In doing so, the Munich court ordered Heta to pay Bayern LB approximately €2.3bn. This decision is now subject to an appeal by Heta.


The success of bank resolution depends, to a large extent, on the courts of Member States recognizing and giving effect to the actions of another Member State's resolution authority. In the above two decisions, national courts have taken a narrow view of the recognition obligations in the BRRD. These decisions emphasize the need for resolution authorities to be careful in how they frame their actions if they wish to avoid their schemes being disrupted by legal action in other Member States.


Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation and Others v Novo Banco SA.

2 The BRRD essentially is a Europe-wide model law that is required to be implemented locally by each of the Member States.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Barnabas W.B. Reynolds
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions