United States: New Jersey Tax Court Rules No Adjustment Allowed To State Income To Reverse Consolidated IRC Attribute Reduction

In a decision released July 20, the Tax Court of New Jersey ruled that a company included in a federal consolidated income tax return could not adjust its entire net income (ENI) for New Jersey Corporation Business Tax (CBT) purposes to reverse the impact of a reduction in tax attributes required by Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 108(b) and the federal consolidated return regulations.1

Background

The taxpayer, MCI Communication Services, Inc. (MCIC), was a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCI, Inc. (MCI), the surviving entity after a 2004 corporate reorganization. In 2002, MCI's predecessor, Worldcom, Inc. (Worldcom) filed a Petition for Reorganization pursuant to Title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries. Upon emerging from bankruptcy in April 2004, Worldcom merged into MCI, and a substantial amount of the debt of MCI and its affiliated entities (MCI Group) was cancelled. For federal income tax purposes, the income from the cancellation of indebtedness (CODI) which resulted from the bankruptcy was excluded from the income of the members of the MCI Group. As required by the IRC, members of the MCI Group reduced some of their federal tax attributes by the aggregate amount of the excluded CODI. Because Worldcom itself had limited tax attributes, "lower-tier" members of the group, including MCIC, were required to take into account a portion of the CODI of "upper-tier" members and to reduce their tax attributes with respect to the "pushed down" CODI.

For the 2005 tax year, MCIC consented to file consolidated returns for federal income tax purposes with the MCI Group and recognized $271,144,051 in income solely as a result of the pushed-down CODI. On its 2005 CBT return, MCIC reported a $1,142,454 refund, based on a deduction of $271,144,051 included as an other deduction and labeled "Reversal of Federal Attribute Reduction Turn."

The New Jersey Division of Taxation disallowed the deduction and issued a final determination on July 24, 2007 that was ultimately upheld, and MCIC appealed the final determination to the Tax Court.

Division's Disallowance of Deduction to Reverse Effect of Reduction in Tax Attributes

MCIC argued that if ENI were reflected "as if it had filed its Federal return on its own separate basis" as required by New Jersey law, the adjustments to basis for CODI of upper-tier members would not have been made and MCIC's income would not have been increased as a result. Therefore, MCIC was compelled to calculate its ENI for CBT purposes as if the CODI of the upper-tier members had not been attributed to MCIC, and the "federal attribute reduction turn" deduction reflected this calculation. Alternatively, MCIC argued that disallowance of the deduction for the federal attribute reduction turn created and taxed phantom income. Finally, MCIC argued that there were no provisions in the CBT or the related regulations requiring the reduction of tax attributes in connection with the discharge of indebtedness and, therefore, it should have been permitted to adjust the IRC Section 108(b) tax attribute reductions created by the allocation of upper-tier members' CODI.2

ENI Calculation

The New Jersey CBT requires that all non-exempt domestic and foreign corporations pay an annual franchise tax for the privilege of having or exercising a corporate franchise in New Jersey, or for the privilege of deriving receipts from sources within New Jersey, or for the privilege of doing business, employing capital or owning capital or property, or maintaining an office in New Jersey.3 The franchise tax is generally based on the greater of an alternative minimum assessment or a percentage of the corporation's ENI, which is a measure of federal taxable income.4

Generally, for federal income tax purposes, gross income includes income from the discharge of indebtedness.5 However, an exclusion from income is provided for CODI otherwise includable in income where the discharge occurs as part of a Title 11 bankruptcy.6 If the CODI is excluded from income, a reduction of certain tax attributes of the discharged taxpayer is required to the extent of the excluded CODI.7 As a result, a discharged taxpayer generally takes the excluded CODI into income through the reduction of tax attributes such as net operating losses, tax credits, or the basis in assets which would otherwise generate deductions such as depreciation.

In the case of a taxpayer filing a consolidated federal income tax return, if the parent company has limited tax attributes, the federal consolidated return regulations in effect during the tax year at issue required the parent company to effectively "push down" the CODI that exceeded its tax attributes to reduce its subsidiaries' attributes to the full extent of the CODI, or until there were no remaining attributes left to absorb.8

In this case, both MCIC and the Division agreed that the result of the CODI attributed to the taxpayer from upper-tier members of the MCI Group and the resulting reduction in tax attributes was an increase in taxable income of $271,144,051. The taxpayer contended that its New Jersey ENI should be reduced by an equal amount, but the Division disagreed.

New Jersey does not allow for the filing of consolidated income tax returns, but instead generally requires each entity in a corporate group with activity in New Jersey to file a separate corporate business tax return.9 Specifically, where a taxpayer is a member of a group that files a consolidated income tax return for federal income tax purposes, the taxpayer must complete and file its own return under the CBT and must reflect ENI as if it had filed its federal income tax return on a separate basis.10

In this case, MCIC included in its unconsolidated federal taxable income, before net operating loss deductions and special deductions, the attribute reduction amount of $271,144,051. On its CBT return, MCIC claimed such amount as a deduction to reverse the "federal attribute reduction turn."

MCIC argued that, but for the filing of a consolidated return for federal income tax purposes, there would have been no required reduction of its tax attributes by the amount of the CODI pushed down to it from upper-tier members. Noting that "ENI for New Jersey CBT purposes is inextricably linked to federal taxable income," the Court rejected MCIC's position.

For support, the Court turned to a previous case which considered whether an election to treat a stock sale as an asset sale11 available to federal consolidated income tax filers was recognizable for New Jersey CBT purposes. At issue was whether the "deemed sale" of a subsidiary's assets to itself was a taxable event. In that instance, the Court ruled that the taxpayer was required to recognize the election and the gain, noting that New Jersey's prohibition against consolidated returns "merely requires that the tax consequences be independently reported."12 Thus, the Court determined that the gain from the deemed sale must be independently reported and recognized by the subsidiary at issue, noting that "the parties made the...election and are bound to accept the consequences which flow from it...."13

Finding no perceptible difference between that issue and the current case, the Tax Court found that as MCIC consented to the federal consolidated return filing, MCIC was required to take into account the excess CODI from upper-tier members of the group which increased MCIC's federal taxable income.

Phantom Income

MCIC further argued that the disallowance of the deduction for the "federal attribute reduction turn" created and taxed so-called "phantom income," contradicting reasoning previously applied by the Tax Court. In the referenced case, the Tax Court permitted a corporate taxpayer to increase its basis by the amount of the bonus depreciation allowed under federal law which was not permitted under the New Jersey CBT and for which the plaintiff had received no benefit, when calculating the gain on a sale of depreciable assets.14 In that instance, the Tax Court had depended upon a New Jersey Supreme Court decision which held that where a taxpayer's federal adjusted basis reflected losses allowed under federal income tax law which were not allowed under the New Jersey Gross Income Tax, the taxpayer was entitled to determine gain by increasing its basis by the amount of unutilized losses.15 In that decision, the Supreme Court relied upon its interpretation of the provision defining net gains for New Jersey Gross Income Tax purposes, and the concept that a taxpayer may not be taxed on the return of capital, noting that the legislature intended to tax only income.16

Both cases referenced by MCIC involved the determination of how to treat the gain on a sale of assets and the potential taxation of a return of capital. Distinguishing between those cases and the current issue, the Tax Court noted that "in those cases, there was an inequality of treatment between federal and New Jersey law, while in the matter now before the court the same benefit (or lack thereof) accorded to plaintiff under federal law is identical to that being accorded plaintiff under New Jersey law." Thus, the Tax Court rejected MCIC's application of the "phantom income" rationale.

No New Jersey Requirement to Reduce Tax Attributes

MCIC's final argument focused on the fact that no specific New Jersey provision requires the reduction of tax attributes as a result of "pushed down" CODI. Instead, MCIC suggested decoupling from the tax attribute calculation by referencing a position stated in a New Jersey newsletter, which stated: "[t]he New Jersey net operating loss deduction is calculated independently of the Federal tax attributes,17 and at the present time there is no provision to reduce tax attributes connected with discharge of indebtedness. Thus, New Jersey would not require the corporation to reduce New Jersey net operating loss with respect to discharge of indebtedness for corporation business tax purposes."18

Rejecting MCIC's position, the Tax Court distinguished the reduction referenced in the Division's newsletter from the reduction at issue. Specifically, the reduction in the newsletter dealt with net operating losses while the reductions at issue for the taxpayer related to the tax basis of certain assets. Since ENI is defined with reference to federal taxable income, before the net operating loss deduction, net operating losses are excluded from the determination of a taxpayer's ENI. In contrast, the tax effect of the reductions in basis required by IRC Section 108(b) are taken into account in computing ENI. Although New Jersey does not separately require any IRC Section 108(b) reduction to any tax attributes, the Division's newsletter was found to have no bearing on the effect of the federal requirement that taxable income be calculated with reference to all reductions in tax attributes required by IRC Section 108(b).

Commentary

The Tax Court's divergence from the general notion that in a separate reporting state, the starting point in determining ENI is federal taxable income computed on a separate entity basis is somewhat troubling. The impact of this decision could be significant, potentially extending to many of the required adjustments for federal consolidated income tax return purposes. The Tax Court may see further controversies in this area seeking reconciliation of this decision with the cases referenced by the taxpayer that distinguished between consolidated concepts and the need to adjust in a separate reporting environment. Barring a successful appeal, this decision certainly leaves taxpayers filing federal consolidated returns with some uncertainty regarding the correct calculation of ENI.

Taxpayers who received CODI in privilege periods ending before or on June 30, 2014 and have taken the position that their New Jersey CBT attributes should not be reduced at all because of the Division's guidance in its newsletter regarding net operating losses should consider reviewing that position in light of the Tax Court's willingness to limit such guidance to the net operating loss attribute. It should be noted that for privilege periods ending after June 30, 2014, any newly created NOL or carryovers are specifically required to be reduced if CODI is received, superseding the Division's guidance in its newsletter.19

Footnotes

1 MCI Communication Services, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Tax Court Dkt. No. 013905-2010, Jul. 20, 2015.

2 Id.

3 N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10a-2.

4 N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10a-5. Specifically, ENI is defined as "total net income from all sources, whether within or without the United States, and shall include the gain derived from the employment of capital or labor, of from both combined, as well as profit gained through a sale or conversion of capital assets. For the purpose of this act, the amount of a taxpayer's entire net income shall be deemed prima facie to be equal in amount to the taxable income, before net operating loss deduction and special deductions, which the taxpayer is required to report, or, if the taxpayer is classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes, would otherwise be required to report, to the United States Treasury Department for the purpose of computing its federal income tax." N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10a-4(k).

5 IRC § 61(a)(12).

6 IRC § 108(a)(1)(A).

7 IRC § 108(b)(1).

8 TEMP. TREAS. REGS. § 1.1502-28T(a). Final regulations which include certain exceptions and available elections [§ 1.1502-28(d)] were adopted March 22, 2005, applicable to discharges of indebtedness that occur after March 21, 2005.

9 N.J. ADMIN. CODE tit. 18, § 7-11.15.

10 Id.

11 Such election is commonly referred to as an IRC § 338(h)(10) election, referencing the relevant authority granting the ability to make the election.

12 General Building Products Corp. v. New Jersey, Division of Taxation, 14 N.J. Tax 232 (Tax 1994), aff'd., 15 N.J. Tax 213 (App. Div. 1995).

13 Id.

14 Toyota Motor Credit Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Tax Court Dkt. No. 002021- 2010, Aug. 1, 2014. For further details, see GT SALT Alert: New Jersey Tax Court Allows Taxpayer to Revise Federal Adjusted Basis for Corporation Business Tax Purposes.

15 Koch v. Director, Division of Taxation, 722 A. 2d. 218 (N.J. 1999).

16 N.J. REV. STAT. § 54A:5-1(c), which defines net gains for New Jersey Gross Income Tax purposes.

17 N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10a-4(k)(6).

18 New Jersey State Tax News, Corporation Business Tax – Forgiveness of Debt, Winter 1996.

19 N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10A-4(k)(6)(F).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions