United States: SEC Proposes Clawback Rules

On July 1, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") proposed long-awaited rules under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank") requiring the national securities exchanges to adopt listing standards mandating that listed companies have a policy to recover from current and former executive officers any incentive-based compensation based on financial information that was subsequently corrected in an accounting restatement.

The highlights of the proposed rules are as follows:

  • The rules would apply to almost all categories of listed issuers, including smaller reporting companies, emerging growth companies, foreign private issuers, and controlled companies, with limited exceptions for registered investment companies that do not use incentive compensation and unit investment trusts.
  • The requirement to recover or claw back erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation would be triggered by an accounting restatement that is attributable to an error that is material to previously issued financial statements. "Wrongdoing" is not required as it is under the Sarbanes-Oxley clawback provision.
  • The recovery policy would apply to each "executive officer" as defined in Rule 16(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, regardless of whether the executive officer had any role in the preparation of the financial statements.
  • The amount to be recovered would be the amount received by the executive officer that exceeds the amount he or she would have received had the incentive-based compensation been determined based on the restated financial statements.
  • Incentive-based compensation that would be subject to recovery includes compensation granted, earned, or vested based on attainment of any financial reporting measure, on stock price, or on total shareholder return. Equity awards that are strictly time-based would not be covered.
  • The recovery obligation would apply to any excess compensation applicable to performance during the three completed fiscal years preceding the date on which the company is required to restate.
  • The issuer would have very little discretion in deciding whether to pursue recovery of erroneously awarded compensation, and companies would not be permitted to indemnify or reimburse executives for recovered compensation.
  • The recovery obligation would apply to erroneously awarded compensation received by current and former executive officers on or after the effective date of the new rules – not the effective dates of the listing standards implementing the rules – that results from attaining a financial reporting measure based on financial information for any fiscal period ending on or after the effective date of the rules.

Timing of Restatements Requiring Recovery – The Three-Year Look-Back Period

The proposed rules provide that an issuer's recovery policy must apply to any incentive-based compensation received by current or former executive officers during the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date on which the issuer is "required" to prepare a restatement to correct the material error. An issuer is required to prepare an accounting restatement under the proposed rules on the earlier of:

  • The date on which the issuer's board of directors, a committee of the board, or the officer or officers of the issuer authorized to take such action if board action is not required concludes, or reasonably should have concluded, that the issuer's previously issued financial statements contained a material error; or
  • The date on which a court, regulator, or other legally authorized body directs the issuer to restate previously issued financial statements to correct a material error.

The proposing release notes that the first proposed date would generally coincide with the occurrence of an event described in Item 4.02(a) of Form 8-K, which requires the filing of Form 8-K if the board, a board committee, or the officer or officers of the issuer authorized to take such action if board action is not required concludes that any previously issued financial statements should no longer be relied upon because of an error.

Because the timing of when a restatement is required forms the basis for calculating the three-year recovery/look-back, any delay in fixing that date that spans the end of a fiscal year may permit some erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation to escape recovery. Accordingly, we expect the SEC staff and private litigants to pay close attention to how that date is established. Meaningful time can pass between a preliminary assessment by management that a restatement may be required and a formal determination by the audit committee that an error is material enough to warrant restatement. It may be appropriate for issuers to make it explicit in their audit committee charters that only the audit committee or the full board of directors has the authority to determine that a restatement should be prepared or that any previously issued financial statements should no longer be relied upon.

Incentive-Based Compensation

Incentive-based compensation potentially subject to recovery under proposed Rule 10D-1 includes compensation that is granted, earned, or vested based wholly or in part on the attainment of a "financial reporting measure." The proposing release has a nonexclusive list of financial metrics that qualify as financial reporting measures. That list does not contain any surprises. However, stock price and total shareholder return, though not commonly viewed as financial reporting measures, are explicitly included in the statutory definition of financial reporting measures. As a result, a cash incentive program that is tied, in whole or in part, to the issuer's stock price or a total shareholder return calculation will be incentive-based compensation under the rules.

The definition of incentive-based compensation is quite broad, but the term does not encompass nonfinancial reporting measures that may affect incentive compensation. Statistical or operational measures, such as opening a specified number of stores; obtaining regulatory approval of a product; or completing a restructuring plan, a financing, or an acquisition or disposition, are not financial reporting measures, and compensation based on these measures would not be incentive-based compensation for purposes of the rules.

Section 954 of Dodd-Frank provides explicitly that incentive-based compensation includes "stock options awarded as compensation." However, under the rules as proposed, incentive-based compensation includes options and other equity awards only if the granting or vesting of those awards would be based in whole or in part on financial reporting measures. Equity that is entirely time-based would not be considered incentive-based compensation under Rule 10D-1.

Recovery Amount

The amount of incentive-based compensation recoverable from a current or former executive officer is the amount that exceeds the amount, determined on a pre-tax basis, that would have been received had it been based on the accounting restatement. When incentive-based compensation is based in part on a financial reporting measure subject to recovery and partially based on other factors, only the portion based on or derived from the financial reporting measure needs to be recalculated and recovered.

The proposing release recognizes that determining the stock price impact of a material restatement will require complex analyses and that it may be difficult to establish the relationship between an accounting error and the stock price. Mindful of these challenges, the proposal permits issuers to use reasonable estimates when determining the impact of a restatement on stock price and total shareholder return. While the staff believes this standard lessens the pressure on companies in determining the amount of compensation subject to recovery, this is likely to be an area of focus by private litigants.

Discretion in Seeking Recovery

The proposed rules provide issuers with very little discretion in determining whether to pursue recovery of erroneously awarded compensation. An issuer must recover erroneously awarded compensation except to the extent it would be "impractical to do so." The proposing release states that it would be impractical if the direct expense paid to a third party to assist in recovery would exceed the amount to be recovered or if recovery would violate a home country law that was adopted prior to the proposed rule being published in the Federal Register. Before concluding that recovery would be too expensive, an issuer must make a reasonable attempt to recover the erroneously awarded compensation and document that attempt to the applicable stock exchange. As discussed below, disclosure would also be required under proposed Item 402(w) of Regulation S-K if the issuer decides not to pursue recovery. In addition, the proposing release notes, "we are not proposing that issuers settle for less than full recovery." Presumably, this means that issuers must pursue recovery claims to trial, unless not doing so fits within the "impractical" standard.

The proposed rules provide some discretion in the means of recovery. So long as recovery is pursued reasonably promptly, the issuer should be permitted to recover compensation by direct payment from the recipient, by receiving it over a reasonable period of time, by reducing future pay, or by requiring forfeiture of other awards.

Disclosure Requirements

The proposed rules add a new Item 402(w) to Regulation S-K. Form 10-K or proxy statement disclosure under that item would be required if an issuer completes a restatement that requires recovery of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation pursuant to the issuer's recovery policy or if there is an outstanding balance of excess incentive-based compensation from the application of the policy in a previous year. Disclosure would include:

(i) The date on which the issuer was required to prepare the accounting restatement,

(ii) The aggregate dollar amount of excess incentive-based compensation attributable to the accounting misstatement or an explanation as to why that amount has not yet been determined,

(iii) The estimates that were used in determining the excess incentive-based compensation attributable to the accounting misstatement if the financial reporting measure related to stock price or total shareholder return, and

(iv) The aggregate dollar amount of excess incentive-based compensation that remained outstanding and unrecovered at the end of the last fiscal year.

If the issuer decides not to pursue recovery from an executive officer or former executive officer, it must disclose the individual's name, the amount forgone, and the reason the issuer decided not to pursue recovery. In addition, the issuer must disclose the name of any person who, as of the end of the last fiscal year, had erroneously been awarded incentive-based compensation that was unrecovered for a period of 180 days or longer, as well as the dollar amount of the outstanding compensation.

The disclosure required by Item 402(w) would have to be provided in interactive data format using XBRL and included as an exhibit to the issuer's proxy statement or annual report on Form 10-K.

Existing Plans and Contracts

The proposing release downplays the challenges issuers may face in seeking to claw back compensation that was awarded and earned pursuant to pre-existing plans and binding contracts. As far as plans are concerned, companies should have adequate time to amend incentive compensation plans before the rules become final to allow for recovery once they become effective. However, issuers are generally not able unilaterally to amend binding employment contracts with executives. The proposing release dismisses this dynamic with the conclusory statement that "issuers can amend their contracts to accommodate recovery."

Timing and Next Steps

It is difficult to predict when the SEC might adopt final rules in light of the significant commentary expected to be generated by the proposals. The proposals require each exchange to propose its listing standards in response to the rules no later than 90 days following publication of the final adopted version of Rule 10D-1, and those listing standards must be effective no later than one year following that publication date. Therefore, final application of the clawback rules will not occur for quite some time, perhaps not until 2017. However, it is worth noting that the clawback rules will apply to erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation paid or awarded based on financial measures for any fiscal year ending after the date the SEC's rules are final, not ending after the date the listing standards become final.

Issuers should consider the following:

  • Many issuers have already adopted clawback policies, but they likely do not satisfy the requirements of the proposed rules, unless they simply incorporate into the policy any rules adopted by the SEC. Given the significant areas in which the SEC has asked for comment, it may make sense to delay revising existing clawback policies to comply with the rules until there is greater visibility into what the final rules will look like.
  • Incentive compensation plans and executive contracts should be reviewed to determine whether they contemplate recovery under company clawback policies adopted in accordance with the proposals. While companies may not have the unilateral ability to alter executive employment contracts, there should be ample time to negotiate changes that would comply with likely final rules.
  • Indemnification agreements and insurance coverage should be reviewed to confirm that the company is not protecting executives against the risk of recoupment, which is prohibited by the proposed rules.
  • Issuers should begin reviewing all compensation plans to determine whether they have the right mix of compensation forms, including identifying compensation methods that continue to link a significant portion of executive compensation with company performance while being mindful of the extent to which their executive officers are receiving compensation that may be subject to recovery under the proposed rules.
  • Committee charters should be reviewed and amended as necessary to specify the process for deciding when a restatement is required.
  • It is not too early to reassess who the issuer's executive officers are for purposes of Rule 16(a) and to document how the board reaches that decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions