United States: First Circuit Rules Bankruptcy Code Preempts Puerto Rico's Recovery Act

On Monday, July 6, the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the February 6, 2015 order and injunction of the Puerto Rico District Court and held that section 903(1) of the Bankruptcy Code preempts the Puerto Rico Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act (the "Recovery Act"). Franklin Cal. Tax Free Trust, et al. v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al., (1st Cir. July 6, 2015) (Case No. 15-1218): On February 10, 2015, we reported on the district court's decision holding that the Recovery Act was unconstitutional.

As a result of amendments to the Bankruptcy Code in 1984, Puerto Rico, unlike states, may not authorize its municipalities, including its public utilities like PREPA or PRASA, to seek federal bankruptcy relief under chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code. In considering the appeal of the district court's order, the Court first confirmed that it had jurisdiction to consider the bondholders' claims of preemption, that those claims were ripe and that they had become ripe immediately upon adoption of the Recovery Act. The Court then ruled that the Commonwealth's effort to allow its public corporations to restructure their debt by enacting the Recovery Act is expressly preempted by the federal Bankruptcy Code. Rejecting the Commonwealth's arguments that the 1984 amendments made the preemption provisions of section 903(1) of the Bankruptcy Code inapplicable, the Court stated that "§ 903(1) has applied to Puerto Rico since the predecessor of that section's enactment in 1946. The statute does not currently read, nor does anything about the 1984 amendment suggest, that Puerto Rico is outside the reach of § 903(1)'s prohibition. Op. at 4. Because the Court affirmed the district court's order and injunction, the Court declined to consider the Commonwealth's appeal of the district court's order denying motions to dismiss the bondholders' Contracts Clause and Takings Claims. Op. at 21.


As previously reported, Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution provides that "Congress shall have power . . . [t]o establish . . . uniform laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States . . ." U.S. Const. art. I, § 8. The Court noted that the United States Congress has established uniform laws of bankruptcy by its enactment of the Bankruptcy Code and that the Bankruptcy Code applies in the Commonwealth.

History of Chapter 9 and Puerto Rico. The Court examined closely the history of chapter 9, the requirement for state authorization of any chapter 9 filing and the treatment of Puerto Rico municipalities under the Bankruptcy Code. The Court stated that "at least from 1938 until the modern Bankruptcy Code was introduced in 1978, Puerto Rico, like the states, could authorize its municipalities to obtain federal municipal bankruptcy relief." Puerto Rico's status "changed in 1984, when Congress re-introduced a definition of 'State' to the Code." Section 101(52) of the Bankruptcy Code defines State to include Puerto Rico, as it had prior to 1978. However, the new definition excluded Puerto Rico from the definition of State "for the purpose of defining who may be a debtor under chapter 9" of the Bankruptcy Code. Thus, Puerto Rico's municipalities were now "expressly (though indirectly) forbidden from filing under chapter 9 absent further congressional action." Op. at 14-17.

Recognizing that, by virtue of the 1984 amendments, Puerto Rico now lacked the power it once had to authorize its municipalities to file for chapter 9 relief, the Court next considered whether the 1984 amendments altered the preemption provision of section 903(1) without Congress expressly saying so. Section 903(1) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a State (which for these purposes includes Puerto Rico) may not enact a state law prescribing a method of composition of indebtedness of a municipality that is binding on any creditor that does not consent to the composition. The Court noted that "all of the relevant authority shows that Congress quite plainly wanted a single federal law to be the sole source of authority if municipal bondholders were to have their rights altered without their consent." Op. at 45. The Court further stated: "there is no disputing that the Recovery Act binds creditors without their consent or that it is Puerto Rico's "own version[] of chapter [9]," such that it directly conflicts with § 903(1)'s prohibition of such laws." Op. at 29.

The Court held that the context and history of section 903(1) confirm that section 903(1) "was intended to have a preemptive effect." Op. at 25. The provision derives from its precursor, section 83(1) of the Bankruptcy Act, which Congress enacted to expressly overrule a Supreme Court decision upholding the adjustment of municipal debt in Faitoute Iron & Steel Co. City of Asbury Park, 316 U.S. 502, 513-16 (1942) (state law permitted the adjustment of municipal debt if the city and 85% of creditors agreed).

The Court stated that Congress enacted this provision "to restore what had been believed to be the pre-Faitoute status quo by expressly prohibiting state municipal bankruptcy laws adjusting creditors' debts without their consent." Section 83(1) as recodified in section 903(1) "on [its] face barred Puerto Rico and the Territories, just as [it] did the states, from enacting their own versions of chapter 9 creditor debt adjustment". The re-codification of section 83(1) into section 903(1) "was necessary to maintain the uniformity of the bankruptcy laws by preventing states from "enact[ing] their own versions of chapter IX." Op. at 26-28.

Accordingly, section 903(1) still applies to Puerto Rico in light of the addition of the definition of "State" to the Bankruptcy Code in 1984. The Court held that the definition does not alter the meaning of section 903(1) of the Bankruptcy Code "because 903(1) does not define who may be a debtor under chapter 9 . . . . If Congress had wanted to alter the applicability of § 903(1) to Puerto Rico, it "easily could have written" § 101(52) to exclude Puerto Rico laws from the prohibition of § 903(1)." Op. at 29-30.

Rejection of Commonwealth's Arguments. The Court dismissed the defendants' arguments, including the argument that section 903(1) only applies to creditors of entities that have filed or can file for chapter 9. The Court also rejected arguments that Puerto Rico was in "no-man's land", finding that "Congress preserved to itself that power to authorize Puerto Rican municipalities to seek chapter 9 relief." Op. at 5. In holding that the Recovery Act is preempted by section 903(1) of the Bankruptcy code, the Court rejected following the arguments raised by the Commonwealth:

  • Because chapter 9 does not apply to Puerto Rico, section 903(1) cannot apply to Puerto Rico. The Court held that defendants' interpretation relies on one of two propositions. Either (i) states that do not authorize a Chapter 9 filing are similarly exempted and not barred by section 903(1) or (ii) the availability of Chapter 9 "occupies the field of nonconsensual municipal debt restructuring, and §903(1) merely aims to clarify that the operative clause of § 903 does not undermine that background assumption." Op. at 40-42. The Court held that even if the Commonwealth is correct that chapter 9 preempts the field of nonconsensual municipal debt restructuring, the Commonwealth is not able to demonstrate that that preemption does not apply to Puerto Rico. The Court noted that under defendants' interpretation, states could adopt statutory relief for other municipalities that "fail to qualify for municipal bankruptcy protection for other reasons – including, for example, municipalities that are not 'insolvent'." Op. at 42-44. The Court stated that "[t]o exclude such municipalities from the preemptive scope of § 903 would be an absurd result." Op. at 44. The term "State" does not exclude Puerto Rico municipalities from federal relief; rather, it denies to Puerto Rico the authority to decide when they might access it. (emphasis in original) Absent further congressional action, § 903(1) still applies.
  • Because Puerto Rico municipalities cannot be debtors, bondholders are not "creditors" and therefore, the Recovery Act does not bind creditors in violation of section 903(1). The Court stated that construing the word creditor "so narrowly would undermine the stated purpose . . . in prohibiting states from 'enact[ing] their own versions of Chapter [9]' . . . . Under defendants' construction, any state could avoid the prohibition by denying its municipalities authorization to file under §109(c)(2)." Op. at 34-36.

Impact. Following the District Court's February 6, 2015 order and injunction, the Commonwealth has made little public reference to the Recovery Act. Given the current state of play, this ruling will not materially affect negotiations with bondholders at entities like PREPA, PRASA and PRHTA that would have been subject to the Recovery Act. Instead, efforts are underway for Congress to take action. Representative Pedro Pierluisi, Puerto Rico's non-voting member of Congress, in February, 2015, proposed legislation to amend the Bankruptcy Code to allow Puerto Rico to authorize its public utilities and other distressed municipalities to file chapter 9 petitions. H.R. 870, 114th Cong. (1st Sess. 2015). That bill did not gain traction in Congress however. Because of recent events, Senators Charles Schumer and Richard Blumenthal have announced a plan to sponsor a similar bill and various Congressional leaders have indicated support to take action.

Additionally, on July 6, 2015, Congresswoman Nydia M. Velazquez, representing New York's 7th Congressional District, wrote a letter to President Obama requesting that he convene the President's Working Group on Financial Markets "to ensure an orderly resolution" to Puerto Rico's fiscal crisis. (The President's Working Group on Financial Markets consists of the Secretary of the Treasury, the Chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or their respective designees.)

Finally, the Commonwealth itself has reached out to bondholders to try to restructure its $72 billion of public debt. The Commonwealth has indicated that a moratorium of debt payments may be necessary–a result almost certain to lead to further litigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
22 Oct 2018, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

Orrick Partners Quinn Moss and Richard Chirls will join a panel on Legislative Updates from Tax and OZ Thought Leaders at the Impact Capital Forum event on October 22, 2018.

25 Oct 2018, Workshop, Las Vegas, United States

The BLX/Orrick Workshop offers timely discussions of topics related to post-issuance compliance and tax law for the public finance and 501(c)(3) communities who borrow on a tax-exempt basis.

30 Oct 2018, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

Employment partner Mike Delikat is participating in a discussion hosted by Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations led by Counsel to New York State Governor Cuomo and chair of the Governor’s workgroup on the deregulation of adult marijuana use, Alphonso David.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions